Drivers and barriers towards re-using open government data (OGD): a case study of open data initiative in Oman

Purpose The purpose of this study is to underscore the significance, drivers and barriers towards re-use of open data sets in the context of Oman’s open government data (OGD) initiative. Design/methodology/approach Following a qualitative framework, the paper invoked a documentary analysis approach to probe the OGD initiative of Oman. Specifically, the national OGD portal of Oman (https://data.gov.om/) is being investigated in the paper. Furthermore, the paper invokes a theoretical model of “citizen engagement” (“Data over the wall”, “Code exchange”, “Civic issue tracker” and “Participatory open data model”) proposed by Sieber and Johnson (2015) to assess the extent to which open data sets may be re-used. Findings As per the theoretical model forwarded by Sieber and Johnson (2015), the OGD initiative of Oman is a cusp between “Data over the wall”, “Code exchange” and “Participatory” models. Oman’s OGD initiative facilitates the re-use of the open data sets. However, there are challenges in re-using the open data sets as well. The paper underlines the prospects of better re-use of data sets by institutionalizing the OGD initiative across all administrative levels of the country. Practical implications This study holds relevance for practitioners and policy-makers in Oman to ensure the re-use of data sets is facilitated for generating public value. Originality/value Hitherto, research has underlined the significance of launching OGD initiatives in the West but studies in developing countries are few. The present study seeks to plug this research gap by underlining the significance of OGD re-usage in Oman’s context.

[1]  Anne Fleur van Veenstra,et al.  Opening Moves - Drivers, Enablers and Barriers of Open Data in a Semi-public Organization , 2013, EGOV.

[2]  Anton Gerunov Understanding Open Data Policy: Evidence from Bulgaria , 2017 .

[3]  Natalie Helbig,et al.  Information Strategies for Open Government: Challenges and Prospects for Deriving Public Value from Government Transparency , 2010, EGOV.

[4]  E. Thornton,et al.  Assessing state government financial transparency websites , 2013 .

[5]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  State-of-the-art in open data research: Insights from existing literature and a research agenda , 2016, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[6]  Genie N. L. Stowers,et al.  Understanding the content and features of open data portals in American cities , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[7]  Stuti Saxena,et al.  Prospects of open government data (OGD) in facilitating the economic diversification of GCC region , 2017 .

[8]  Lihong Zhou,et al.  Proposing a framework of barriers to opening government data in China: A critical literature review , 2017, Libr. Hi Tech.

[9]  Stuti Saxena Significance of open government data in the GCC countries , 2017 .

[10]  Frank L. K. Ohemeng,et al.  One way traffic: The open data initiative project and the need for an effective demand side initiative in Ghana , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[11]  A. Tough Accountability, open government and record keeping: time to think again? , 2011 .

[12]  Massimo Craglia,et al.  Access to Public-Sector Information in Europe: Policy, Rights, and Obligations , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[13]  Katleen Janssen,et al.  The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Sunil Choenni,et al.  Socio-technical Impediments of Open Data , 2012 .

[15]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Special Issue on Innovation through Open Data - A Review of the State-of-the-Art and an Emerging Research Agenda: Guest Editors' Introduction , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[16]  Olav Hagen Sataslaatten The Norwegian Noark Model requirements for EDRMS in the context of open government and access to governmental information , 2014 .

[17]  Glenn A. Bowen Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method , 2009 .

[18]  J. Downie Instruction design collaborations with government information specialists: Opening the conversation. , 2007 .

[19]  Peter A. Johnson,et al.  Civic open data at a crossroads: Dominant models and current challenges , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[20]  Sharon S. Dawes,et al.  Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[21]  Maxat Kassen,et al.  Open data in Kazakhstan: incentives, implementation and challenges , 2017, Inf. Technol. People.

[22]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[23]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Design principles for improving the process of publishing open data , 2014 .

[24]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Improving the speed and ease of open data use through metadata, interaction mechanisms, and quality indicators , 2016, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[25]  Sunil Choenni,et al.  Exploring process barriers to release public sector information in local government , 2012, ICEGOV.

[26]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Transparency-by-design as a foundation for open government , 2017 .

[27]  Eric Afful-Dadzie,et al.  Open Government Data in Africa: A preference elicitation analysis of media practitioners , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[28]  Karen Sparck Jones,et al.  The Key Concepts , 2004 .

[29]  Dimosthenis Anagnostopoulos,et al.  Social media for openness and accountability in the public sector: Cases in the Greek context , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[30]  John Carlo Bertot,et al.  Measurement of Open Government: Metrics and Process , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[31]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  A Platform for Closing the Open Data Feedback Loop Based on Web2.0 Functionality , 2014 .

[32]  Lluís Esteve Casellas Serra,et al.  The mapping, selecting and opening of data , 2014 .

[33]  Alana Maurushat,et al.  Opening up government data for Big Data analysis and public benefit , 2017, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[34]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  Organizational measures to stimulate user engagement with open data , 2015 .

[35]  Patrice McDermott,et al.  Building open government , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[36]  Stuti Saxena Integrating Open and Big Data via ‘e-Oman’: prospects and issues , 2016 .

[37]  Helen E. Chandler,et al.  Towards open government: official information on the Web , 1998 .

[38]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  User-centered e-government: Challenges and benefits for government Web sites , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[39]  Pedro Luiz Pizzigatti Corrêa,et al.  Transparency and open government data: a wide national assessment of data openness in Brazilian local governments , 2017 .

[40]  M. Janssen,et al.  A comparison of national open data policies: lessons learned , 2015 .

[41]  Maria Teresa Borzacchiello,et al.  The impact on innovation of open access to spatial environmental information: a research strategy , 2012, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[42]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Exploring stakeholders' expectations of the benefits and barriers of e-government knowledge sharing , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[43]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  A longitudinal cross-sector analysis of open data portal service capability: The case of Australian local governments , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[44]  Arash Joorabchi,et al.  An unsupervised approach to automatic classification of scientific literature utilizing bibliographic metadata , 2011, J. Inf. Sci..

[45]  Luis F. Luna-Reyes,et al.  Open data ecosystems: an international comparison , 2017 .

[46]  Stuti Saxena Open Data in Israel, Georgia and Uzbekistan: nature and scope , 2017 .

[47]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  Benchmarks for Evaluating the Progress of Open Data Adoption , 2015 .

[48]  Frederika Welle Donker,et al.  How to assess the success of the open data ecosystem? , 2017, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[49]  Marco Torchiano,et al.  Open data quality measurement framework: Definition and application to Open Government Data , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[50]  E. Felten,et al.  Government Data and the Invisible Hand , 2009 .

[51]  Philip M. Napoli,et al.  On making public policy with publicly available data: The case of U.S. communications policymaking , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..