Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaption

This paper defines user adaptation as the cognitive and behavioral efforts performed by users to cope with significant information technology events that occur in their work environment. Drawing on coping theory, we posit that users choose different adaptation strategies based on a combination of primary appraisal (i.e., a user's assessment of the expected consequences of an IT event) and secondary appraisal (i.e., a user's assessment of his/her control over the situation). On that basis, we identify four adaptation strategies (benefits maximizing, benefits satisficing, disturbance handling, and self-preservation) which are hypothesized to result in three different individual-level outcomes: restoring emotional stability, minimizing the perceived threats of the technology, and improving user effectiveness and efficiency. A study of the adaptation behaviors of six account managers in two large North American banks provides preliminary support for our model. By explaining adaptation patterns based on users' initial appraisal and subsequent responses to an IT event, our model offers predictive power while retaining an agency view of user adaptation. Also, by focusing on user cognitive and behavioral adaptation responses related to the technology, the work system, and the self, our model accounts for a wide range of user behaviors such as technology appropriation, avoidance, and resistance.

[1]  S. Jex,et al.  Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: a multilevel study. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  The Impact of Information Technologies on Managers' Work:From the Productivity Paradox to the Icarus Paradox ? , 1996 .

[3]  Peter A. Clark,et al.  Anglo-American innovation , 1987 .

[4]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[5]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  USE AND PRODUCTIVITY IN PERSONAL COMPUTING: AN EMPIRICAL TEST , 1989 .

[6]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  M. Jerusalem,et al.  Self-efficacy in stressful life transitions. , 1995 .

[8]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Adjustment to Technological Change: From Mass To Computer-Automated Batch Production , 1988 .

[9]  R. Lazarus,et al.  Toward better research on stress and coping. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[10]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[11]  J. Dutton,et al.  Categorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organizational Action , 1987 .

[12]  Rudolf H. Moos,et al.  Coping, stress resistance, and growth: Conceptualizing adaptive functioning. , 1996 .

[13]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[14]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[15]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[16]  Marc B. Sokol,et al.  Adaptation to difficult designs: Facilitating use of new technology , 1994 .

[17]  Susan Folkman,et al.  Making the case for coping. , 1992 .

[18]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Computerization, productivity, and quality of work-life , 1989, CACM.

[19]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Sources of Influence on Beliefs about Information Technolgoy Use: An Empirical Study of Knowledge Workers , 2003, MIS Q..

[21]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[22]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, NY: Springer; , 1984 .

[24]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[25]  M. Somerfield,et al.  Stress and coping research. Methodological challenges, theoretical advances, and clinical applications. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[26]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[27]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[28]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[29]  Gilbert Yip Wei Tan,et al.  Predictors of Coping Behavior after a Layoff , 1998 .

[30]  Anne Beaudry,et al.  IT-Induced Adaptation and Individual Performance: A Coping Acts Model , 2001, ICIS.

[31]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[32]  Terri L. Griffith Technology Features as Triggers for Sensemaking , 1999 .

[33]  J. Dutton,et al.  Discerning threats and opportunities. , 1988 .

[34]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Disruptive Nature of Information Technology Innovations: The Case of Internet Computing in Systems Development Organizations , 2003, MIS Q..

[35]  R. I. Sutton,et al.  Switching Cognitive Gears: From Habits of Mind to Active Thinking , 1991 .

[36]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Use of group decision support systems as an appropriation process , 1989, [1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume IV: Emerging Technologies and Applications Track.

[37]  Richard S. Lazarus,et al.  Stress and Emotion: A New Synthesis , 1999 .

[38]  S. K. Lo,et al.  Reliability and Validity , 2020, International Encyclopedia of Human Geography.

[39]  S. Folkman,et al.  Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[41]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Information Technology and the Nature of Managerial Work: From the Productivity Paradox to the Icarus Paradox? , 1998, MIS Q..

[42]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  Coping in occupational settings. , 1996 .

[43]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization , 1988 .

[44]  Ellen M. Hufnagel,et al.  User Response Data: The Potential for Errors and Biases , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  S. Folkman,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology If It Changes It Must Be a Process: Study of Emotion and Coping during Three Stages of a College Examination , 2022 .

[46]  E. Rogers,et al.  Reinvention in the Innovation Process , 1980 .

[47]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  The etiology of computerphobia , 1990 .

[48]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[49]  Randall S. Schuler,et al.  Organizational Crisis. Part I: Definition and Conceptualization , 1983 .

[50]  R R McCrae Situational determinants of coping responses: loss, threat, and challenge. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1 , 2000 .

[52]  T. Begley,et al.  Coping strategies as predictors of employee distress and turnover after an organizational consolidation: A longitudinal analysis , 1998 .

[53]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[54]  Steve M. Jex,et al.  Efficacy beliefs and work stress: An exploratory study , 1992 .

[55]  G. Huber,et al.  Organizational Actions in Response to Threats and Opportunities , 2001 .

[56]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy - An Empirical Assessment , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[57]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[58]  K. Weick Technology as equivoque: sensemaking in new technologies , 1990 .

[59]  J. Moskowitz,et al.  Positive affect and the other side of coping. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[60]  R. McCrae,et al.  Age differences and changes in the use of coping mechanisms. , 1989, Journal of gerontology.

[61]  S. Oakland,et al.  Measuring Coping: A Review and Critique , 1996 .

[62]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[63]  J. Rotter Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[64]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[65]  M. Patrickson Adaptation by employees to new technology , 1986 .

[66]  Blake Ives,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research , 1984 .

[67]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding user evaluations of information systems , 1995 .

[68]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Use and productivity in personal computing , 1989, ICIS '89.

[69]  Fred L. Collopy,et al.  Biases in retrospective self-reports of time use: an empirical study of computer users , 1996 .

[70]  James B. Shaw,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Organization, Work Group, and Individual Effectiveness During and After Downsizing , 1997 .

[71]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies , 1999 .

[72]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social cognition, 2nd ed. , 1991 .

[73]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience , 1995 .

[74]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  Collective efficacy versus self-efficacy in coping responses to stressors and control: a cross-cultural study. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[75]  J. Kirk,et al.  Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research , 1985 .

[76]  R. Lazarus Psychological stress and the coping process , 1970 .

[77]  J. Morse Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[78]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A test of task-technology fit theory for group support systems , 1999, DATB.

[79]  I Grant,et al.  Internal vs. external determinants of coping responses to stressful life-events in the elderly. , 1990, The British journal of medical psychology.

[80]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[81]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  EXTENDING THE TASK-TECHNOLOGY FIT MODEL WITH SELF-EFFICACY CONSTRUCTS , 2002 .