Computational Analyses of Quasi-Isolated Bridges with Fusing Bearing Components

Computational systems analyses are described for bridge systems that employ quasi-isolation by using a set of fixed bearings in addition to isolation bearings such as elastomeric bearings with an elastomer-concrete sliding interface or elastomeric bearings with a PTFE (Teflon) to stainless steel sliding interface. The system uses stiffened L-shaped retainer brackets that limit transverse displacement of elastomeric bearings and the bridge is intended to respond predictably, reliably, and elastically under service loading (including small seismic events), but for larger seismic events, certain bridge bearing components are intended to “fuse” and experience nonlinear behaviors that can allow for passive quasi-isolation of the bridge superstructure. To facilitate the computational modeling, experimental findings from ongoing research are being used to formulate phenomenological element models that simulate nonlinear fusing behaviors in the bridge bearings and auxiliary components. Furthermore the substructure pier elements, the bridge foundations and the abutment backwalls were modeled as they can exhibit nonlinear behaviors under large loadings. A parametric study is being carried out to investigate the effectiveness of the isolation system for various bridge structures and bearing combinations, and the findings will provide guidance for confirmation and further development of quasi-isolation design strategies.

[1]  Michael H. Scott,et al.  Plastic Hinge Integration Methods for Force-Based Beam¿Column Elements , 2006 .

[2]  Ahmed Elgamal,et al.  VERTICAL EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION RECORDS: AN OVERVIEW , 2004 .

[3]  Dawn E. Lehman,et al.  Lumped-Plasticity Models for Performance Simulation of Bridge Columns , 2008 .

[4]  F. Seible,et al.  SEISMIC RETROFIT OF CIRCULAR BRIDGE COLUMNS FOR ENHANCED FLEXURAL PERFORMANCE , 1991 .

[5]  Johnny Sun,et al.  Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project , 1997 .

[6]  Evgueni T. Filipov,et al.  Bridge bearing fuse systems for regions with high-magnitude earthquakes at long recurrence intervals , 2010 .

[7]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  Seismic Shear Strength of Circular Reinforced Concrete Columns , 1989 .

[8]  W. D. Liam Finn A Study of Piles during Earthquakes: Issues of Design and Analysis , 2005 .

[9]  James Michael LaFave,et al.  Seismic response of bearings for quasi-isolated bridges- Testing and component modeling , 2011 .

[10]  R Shepherd,et al.  CYCLIC BEHAVIOR OF BRIDGE PIER WALLS FOR RETROFIT , 1993 .

[11]  Daniel H. Tobias,et al.  Overview of Earthquake Resisting System Design and Retrofit Strategy for Bridges in Illinois , 2008 .

[12]  Kyle M. Rollins,et al.  Nonlinear Soil-Abutment-Bridge Structure Interaction for Seismic Performance-Based Design , 2007 .

[13]  David Sanders,et al.  Seismic Response of Bridge Pier Walls in the Weak Direction , 1999 .

[14]  James Michael LaFave,et al.  Analytical fragility analysis of southern Illinois wall pier supported highway bridges , 2009 .

[15]  S. Emerson,et al.  AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 2001. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Fourth Edition. Washington, D.C. , 2007 .

[16]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  SHEAR AND FLEXURAL BEHAVIOR OF LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE BRIDGE COLUMNS IN SEISMIC REGIONS , 1999 .