Development of a novel iPad-based laparoscopic trainer and comparison with a standard laparoscopic trainer for basic laparoscopic skills testing.

INTRODUCTION We developed the iTrainer (iT) as a portable laparoscopic trainer, which incorporates the iPad tablet. We then compared the iT with a standard pelvic trainer (SPT) to assess surgical skills as well as its image quality, resolution, brightness, comfort, and overall performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS We designed and constructed the iT to be compatible with the Apple iPad 3 and standard laparoscopic instruments. Participants were assigned to perform the thread-the-loops task on both trainers and were prospectively randomized to start on either the iT or the SPT. Each participant was allowed a 2-minute warm-up before the 2-minute testing period. We scored participants using the product of skill quality (0-4 scale) and quantity of loops threaded (0-10 scale). Participants then rated each trainer on image quality, resolution, brightness, comfort, and overall performance on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS A total of 45 subjects including 10 undergraduates, 10 medical students, 10 general surgery and urology residents, and 15 experts (fellows and attending surgeons) participated in this study. There was no significant difference between thread-the-loops task scores completed on the iT when compared with the SPT for all groups tested (p > 0.05) with the exception of the medical student group, who performed better on the SPT (p < 0.05). On evaluation of each trainer, participants rated the iT as having superior image quality and resolution when compared with the SPT (p < 0.05) but rated the SPT higher in overall performance (p < 0.05). Brightness and comfort were rated similarly for both trainers. CONCLUSIONS We have demonstrated face validity and criterion validity for the thread-the-loops task on the iT. The iT rated superior in image quality and resolution but inferior in overall performance compared with the SPT. The iT provides trainees a unique advantage over SPT as an additional resource to laparoscopic training as it is inexpensive, portable, and can be readily available for training.

[1]  Chad R. Tracy,et al.  Evaluation of laparoscopic curricula in American urology residency training. , 2011, Journal of endourology.

[2]  R. Bergamaschi,et al.  Validation of a six-task simulation model in minimally invasive surgery , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[3]  J. Dankelman,et al.  Transfer validity of laparoscopic knot-tying training on a VR simulator to a realistic environment: A randomized controlled trial , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  Peter Jaye,et al.  Tablet based simulation provides a new solution to accessing laparoscopic skills training. , 2013, Journal of surgical education.

[5]  Daniel B. Jones,et al.  Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? , 2000, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[6]  Eugene Richie,et al.  "iTrainers"--novel and inexpensive alternatives to traditional laparoscopic box trainers. , 2014, Urology.

[7]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Laparoscopic training in urology: critical analysis of current evidence. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[8]  T. Grantcharov,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[9]  Douglas Landsittel,et al.  Laparoscopic skills training using a webcam trainer. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[10]  T. Ahlering,et al.  Initial impact of a dedicated postgraduate laparoscopic mini-residency on clinical practice patterns. , 2005, Journal of endourology.

[11]  Elspeth M McDougall,et al.  The EZ Trainer: validation of a portable and inexpensive simulator for training basic laparoscopic skills. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[12]  J. Boruff,et al.  Mobile devices in medicine: a survey of how medical students, residents, and faculty use smartphones and other mobile devices to find information. , 2014, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[13]  Daniel B. Jones,et al.  Improving operative performance using a laparoscopic hernia simulator. , 2001, American journal of surgery.

[14]  R. Satava,et al.  Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blinded Study , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[15]  Yan Yan,et al.  Evaluation of laparoscopic performance with alteration in angle of vision. , 2006, Journal of endourology.

[16]  Orrin I. Franko,et al.  Mobile Tablet Use among Academic Physicians and Trainees , 2013, Journal of Medical Systems.

[17]  James R Korndorffer,et al.  Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[18]  Shashi K. Mishra,et al.  Task completion time: Objective tool for assessment of technical skills in laparoscopic simulator for urology trainees , 2008, Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India.

[19]  G. Fried,et al.  Proving the Value of Simulation in Laparoscopic Surgery , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[20]  R. Clayman,et al.  Immediate Impact of an Intensive One-Week Laparoscopy Training Program on Laparoscopic Skills Among Postgraduate Urologists , 2006, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[21]  R. Rabenalt,et al.  Laparoscopy in German urology: changing acceptance among urologists. , 2009, European urology.