Online Pauses and Silence: Chronemic Expectancy Violations in Written Computer-Mediated Communication

This study examines e-mail response latency as an expectancy violation and explores its impact. Managers evaluate job candidates who varied in their response latency to an e-mail (1 day, 2 weeks, and silence for more than a month) and in their reward valence. As predicted by expectancy violations theory, candidate reward valence moderates the effect of response latency on variables such as applicant evaluation, credibility, and attractiveness. A norms-based definition of online silence is presented, and the influential and complex role of response latency and of online silence as nonverbal chronemic cues in written CMC is elaborated.

[1]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Understanding email use: predicting action on a message , 2005, CHI.

[2]  Niki Panteli,et al.  The sound of silence: The case of virtual team organising , 2005, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[3]  J. Finch.  The Vignette Technique in Survey Research , 1987 .

[4]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .

[5]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades , 1981 .

[6]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Expectancies and the Evaluative Consequences of Violations , 1990 .

[7]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Nonverbal Dynamics in Computer-Mediated Communication or: (And the Net: ('S with You, :) and You :) Alone , 2006 .

[8]  John C. Tang,et al.  When Can I Expect an Email Response? A Study of Rhythms in Email Usage , 2003, ECSCW.

[9]  Valerie Manusov,et al.  Effects of gaze on hiring, credibility, attraction and relational message interpretation , 1985 .

[10]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Time Effects in Computer-Mediated Groups: Past, Present, and Future , 2002 .

[11]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Social exclusion and the deconstructed state: time perception, meaninglessness, lethargy, lack of emotion, and self-awareness. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Margaret L. McLaughlin,et al.  AWKWARD SILENCES: BEHAVIORAL ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF THE CONVERSATIONAL LAPSE , 1982 .

[13]  P. Watzlawick,et al.  Pragmatics of human communication , 1975 .

[14]  C. Cramton.  The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[15]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication, and the effect of chronemics on relational communication , 1995, J. Organ. Comput..

[16]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication , 1987 .

[17]  Deborah Tannen,et al.  Perspectives on Silence , 1985 .

[18]  P. Watzlawick,et al.  Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes , 1964 .

[19]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The measurement of interpersonal attraction , 1974 .

[20]  Irwin Altman,et al.  Temporal aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1988 .

[21]  David W. Park,et al.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[22]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships , 2002 .

[23]  Yoram M. Kalman,et al.  Pauses and Response Latencies: A Chronemic Analysis of Asynchronous CMC , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[24]  Tom Bruneau.  Communicative Silences: Forms and Functions , 1973 .

[25]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors , 1988 .

[26]  Melissa C. Thomas-Hunt,et al.  When timeliness matters: the effect of status on reactions to perceived time delay within distributed collaboration. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.