Measuring Investors’ Socially Responsible Preferences in Mutual Funds

The aim of this study is to analyze investor behavior towards socially responsible mutual funds. The analysis is based on an experimental study where a sample of individuals takes investment decisions under different parameters of information about the investment alternatives and expected returns. In the experiment, each participant decides how to distribute an investment budget between two funds, returns on which are uncertain and change over time. Two treatments are conducted, each providing a different degree of information on the socially responsible (SR) character of one of the two investment alternatives. The results obtained suggest that although individuals’ criteria for investment are essentially guided by returns and diversification, participants invest significantly more in a fund when they are explicitly informed about its SR nature. In particular, participants who declare being concerned about SR actually invest significantly more in the SR alternative. Furthermore, the level of SR faithfulness among a small group of investors is such that they invest the main share of their budget in the SR fund, even when the return differential is highly unfavorable. Providing clear information about the SR characteristics of an investment is crucial to help investors express their preferences.

[1]  Michael L. Barnett,et al.  Beyond Dichotomy: The Curvilinear Relationship between Social Responsibility and Financial Performance , 2006 .

[2]  On Absolute and Relative Performance and the Demand for Mutual Funds - Experimental Evidence , 2003 .

[3]  Alan Lewis,et al.  Support for Investor Activism among U.K. Ethical Investors , 2000 .

[4]  Steve Schueth.  Socially Responsible Investing in the United States , 2003 .

[5]  Affect in a Behavioral Asset Pricing Model , 2008 .

[6]  C. Cowton,et al.  The ethical investor: Exploring dimensions of investment behaviour , 1993 .

[7]  John Matatko,et al.  Ethical Unit Trust Financial Performance: Small Company Effects and Fund Size Effects , 1997 .

[8]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[10]  M. Statman,et al.  Socially Responsible Mutual Funds (corrected) , 2000 .

[11]  Michael M. Pompian,et al.  Behavioral Finance and Wealth Management , 2006 .

[12]  Grant Michelson,et al.  Ethical Investment Processes and Outcomes , 2004 .

[13]  Framing the Individual Investor: The Case of Capital Guaranteed Funds , 2005 .

[14]  Ping Chen,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics and evolutionary economics , 1993 .

[15]  C. D. Sinclair,et al.  Evaluating the Performance of Ethical and Non-Ethical Funds: A Matched Pair Analysis , 2005 .

[16]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Experimental Economics: Methods, Problems, and Promise , 1993 .

[17]  C. Mackenzie.  The Choice of Criteria in Ethical Investment , 1998 .

[18]  Katherina Glac.  Understanding Socially Responsible Investing: The Effect of Decision Frames and Trade-off Options , 2009 .

[19]  Robin P. Cubitt,et al.  Experimental Economics: Rethinking the Rules , 2009 .

[20]  Ronald R. King,et al.  The Robustness of Bubbles and Crashes in Experimental Stock Markets , 1993 .

[21]  Brahim Saadouni,et al.  The Financial Performance of Ethical Investment Funds , 1995 .

[22]  A. Lewis,et al.  Morals, money, ethical investing and economic psychology , 2000 .

[23]  David Shani,et al.  Social Issues and Socially Responsible Investment Behavior: A Preliminary Empirical Investigation , 1991 .

[24]  Jonas Nilsson.  Segmenting socially responsible mutual fund investors , 2009 .

[25]  V. Smith,et al.  Bubbles, Crashes, and Endogenous Expectations in Experimental Spot Asset Markets , 1988 .

[26]  Gerard J. Tellis,et al.  Blowing bubbles: Heuristics and biases in the run-up of stock prices , 2005 .

[27]  Lorne Cummings,et al.  The Financial Performance of Ethical Investment Trusts: An Australian Perspective , 2000 .

[28]  John Matatko,et al.  The Investment Performance of UK “Ethical” Unit Trusts , 1992 .

[29]  C. Cowton.  Playing by the rules: ethical criteria at an ethical investment fund , 1999 .

[30]  Stephen P. Williams.  U.K. Ethical Investment , 1999 .

[31]  C. Cowton.  Managing financial performance at an ethical investment fund , 2004 .

[32]  J. C. Matallín‐Sáez,et al.  Performance of Ethical Mutual Funds in Spain: Sacrifice or Premium? , 2008 .

[33]  M. Statman,et al.  Behaviorial Finance: Past Battles and Future Engagements , 1999 .

[34]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[35]  The Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds: The Role of Fees And Management Companies , 2008 .

[36]  Alan Lewis,et al.  Commitment among ethical investors : An experimental approach , 2001 .

[37]  Chendi Zhang,et al.  The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds , 2008 .

[38]  L. J. Brooks,et al.  Corporate ethical performance: Trends, forecasts and outlooks , 1989 .

[39]  Nelson Areal,et al.  The Performance of European Socially Responsible Funds , 2009 .

[40]  R. Hill,et al.  The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior , 2006 .

[41]  P. Philips,et al.  Why Do We Invest Ethically? , 2005 .

[42]  Paul F. Williams,et al.  A descriptive study of social responsibility mutual funds , 1988 .

[43]  Daniel Friedman,et al.  Experimental Methods: A Primer for Economists , 1994 .

[44]  M. Statman,et al.  Normal Investors, Then and Now , 2004 .

[45]  K. B. Murray,et al.  Using a hierarchy-of-effects approach to gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward the firm: Financial versus nonfinancial impacts , 1997 .

[46]  Warren Bailey,et al.  Behavioral Biases of Mutual Fund Investors , 2010 .

[47]  Jacquelyn E. Humphrey,et al.  Socially Responsible Investment Fund Performance: The Impact of Screening Intensity , 2010 .

[48]  Stewart Jones,et al.  The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Investment Funds in Australia , 2008 .

[49]  Anjan V. Thakor,et al.  Handbook of Financial Intermediation and Banking , 2008 .

[50]  Simone Alfarano,et al.  On the role of heterogeneous and imperfect information in a laboratory financial market , 2006, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[51]  Lu Zheng,et al.  CHAPTER 8 – The Behavior of Mutual Fund Investors , 2008 .

[52]  Aurora García-Gallego,et al.  An Experimental Validation of Hypothetical WTP for a Recyclable Product , 2004 .

[53]  Zakri Y. Bello.  Socially Responsible Investing And Portfolio Diversification , 2005 .

[54]  G. Mill.  The Financial Performance of a Socially Responsible Investment Over Time and a Possible Link with Corporate Social Responsibility , 2006 .

[55]  P. Bossaerts.  Experiments with Financial Markets: Implications for Asset Pricing Theory , 2001 .

[56]  Rob Bauer,et al.  The Ethical Mutual Fund Performance Debate: New Evidence from Canada , 2007 .

[57]  Affect in a Behavioral Asset-Pricing Model , 2008 .

[58]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[59]  A. Lewis,et al.  Paying to Be Good? U.K. Ethical Investments , 1992 .

[60]  R. Sparkes.  The Challenge of Ethical Investment: Activism, Assets and Analysis , 1998 .

[61]  C. Bram Cadsby,et al.  Laboratory experiments in corporate and investment finance: a survey , 1998 .

[62]  Christopher C. Geczy,et al.  Investing in Socially Responsible Mutual Funds , 2005, The Review of Asset Pricing Studies.