Sexual self-presentation on social network sites: Who does it and how is it perceived?

Online sexual self-presentation is highly influenced by peer norms.Girls who present themselves in sexual ways are evaluated more negatively by other girls but more positively by boys.Boys who present themselves in sexual ways are evaluated more positively by girls but not by boys. The aims of this study were to investigate (a) the role of peer factors in adolescents' sexual self-presentation on social network sites, and (b) how adolescents who present themselves sexually online are evaluated by others. 238 high school students (aged 12-18) evaluated either a sexual or non-sexual online presentation of same-sex and opposite-sex peers. Moreover, they filled in a questionnaire about their own self-presentation behavior. Findings showed that peer norms played a crucial role in whether adolescents posted sexual pictures of themselves online. Moreover, need for popularity was a strong predictor for posting such pictures. Girls who presented themselves in sexual ways were evaluated more negatively by other girls but more positively by boys. Similarly, boys who presented themselves in sexual ways were evaluated more positively by girls but not by boys.

[1]  W. Heirman,et al.  Connecting and protecting? Comparing predictors of self-disclosure and privacy settings use between adolescents and adults , 2012 .

[2]  P. Pye-Smith.  The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[3]  Tracy Vaillancourt,et al.  Intolerance of sexy peers: intrasexual competition among women. , 2011, Aggressive behavior.

[4]  Erin M. Schumaker,et al.  The Effects of Verbal Versus Photographic Self‐Presentation on Impression Formation in Facebook , 2012 .

[5]  Laurence Steinberg,et al.  The developmental pattern of resistance to peer influence in adolescence: will the teenager ever be able to resist? , 2009, Journal of adolescence.

[6]  F. N. Castro,et al.  Mate Choice in Adolescence: Idealizing Romantic Partners , 2013 .

[7]  M. Haselton,et al.  Bulletin Personality and Social Psychology Why Is Muscularity Sexy? Tests of the Fitness Indicator Hypothesis on Behalf Of: Society for Personality and Social Psychology , 2022 .

[8]  G. Miller,et al.  Handbook of Interpersonal Communication , 1985 .

[9]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  Adolescents’ Exposure to Sexually Explicit Material on the Internet , 2006, Commun. Res..

[10]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Adolescents' age preferences for dating partners: support for an evolutionary model of life-history strategies. , 1996, Child development.

[11]  D. Buss,et al.  The evolutionary psychology of human social strategies. , 1996 .

[12]  Deanna L. Messervey,et al.  Measuring Peer Pressure, Popularity, and Conformity in Adolescent Boys and Girls: Predicting School Performance, Sexual Attitudes, and Substance Abuse , 2000 .

[13]  Clayton Neighbors,et al.  Self-consciousness moderates the relationship between perceived norms and drinking in college students. , 2008, Addictive behaviors.

[14]  E. Hill,et al.  Physical attractiveness: Manipulation by physique and status displays , 1987 .

[15]  Tom Reichert,et al.  Defining Sexually Oriented Appeals in Advertising: a Grounded Theory Investigation , 2000 .

[16]  R. Weber,et al.  Testing Equivalence in Communication Research: Theory and Application , 2012 .

[17]  Jochen Peter,et al.  Exploring Associations Between Exposure to Sexy Online Self-Presentations and Adolescents’ Sexual Attitudes and Behavior , 2015, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[18]  Adriana M. Manago,et al.  The Construction of the Virtual Self on MySpace , 2010 .

[19]  L. Steinberg,et al.  Age differences in resistance to peer influence. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[20]  Stephanie M. Manasse,et al.  Adolescents' self-presentation on a teen dating web site: a risk-content analysis. , 2010, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[21]  Laurence Steinberg,et al.  Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: an experimental study. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[22]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  The Influence of Descriptive and Injunctive Peer Norms on Adolescents' Risky Sexual Online Behavior , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[23]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[24]  J. V. Oosten,et al.  Putting things in perspective. Young people’s susceptibility to the effects of sexual media content , 2011 .

[25]  Libby N Brockman,et al.  An evaluation of the distribution of sexual references among "Top 8" MySpace friends. , 2010, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[26]  Jane D. Brown,et al.  Sexual Media Practice: How Adolescents Select, Engage with, and Are Affected by Sexual Media , 2012 .

[27]  A. Campbell,et al.  Female competition: Causes, constraints, content, and contexts , 2004, Journal of sex research.

[28]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships , 2002 .

[29]  Leanna M. Closson.  Status and Gender Differences in Early Adolescents' Descriptions of Popularity. , 2009 .

[30]  David M. McCord,et al.  Determinants of Male Attractiveness : “ Hotness ” Ratings as a Function of Perceived Resources , 2010 .

[31]  Jane D. Brown,et al.  “Hit Me Up and We Can Get Down” , 2012 .

[32]  Megan A Moreno,et al.  Sexpectations: male college students' views about displayed sexual references on females' social networking web sites. , 2011, Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology.

[33]  P. Greenfield,et al.  Connecting developmental constructions to the internet: identity presentation and sexual exploration in online teen chat rooms. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[34]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  Anthony Cox,et al.  The influence of female attractiveness on competitor derogation , 2009 .

[36]  L. Steinberg,et al.  Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain's reward circuitry. , 2011, Developmental science.

[37]  D. Buss,et al.  Sexual strategies pursued and mate attraction tactics deployed. , 2006 .

[38]  J. Wolak,et al.  Youth Internet users at risk for the most serious online sexual solicitations. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[39]  Jessica Ringrose,et al.  Are You Sexy, Flirty, Or A Slut? Exploring ‘Sexualization’ and How Teen Girls Perform/Negotiate Digital Sexual Identity on Social Networking Sites , 2011 .

[40]  Sonja Utz,et al.  It Is All About Being Popular: The Effects of Need for Popularity on Social Network Site Use , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[41]  A. Siibak.  Constructing the Self through the Photo selection - Visual Impression Management on Social Networking Websites , 2009 .

[42]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Gender, Communication, and Self-Presentation in Teen Chatrooms Revisited: Have Patterns Changed? , 2011, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[43]  Shelly Campo,et al.  L. C. Lederman & L. P. Stewart (Eds.). (2005). Changing the Culture of College Drinking: A Socially Situated Health Communication Campaign. , 2007 .

[44]  Kathryn M. LaFontana,et al.  Children's perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: a multimethod assessment. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[45]  Justin W. Patchin,et al.  Personal information of adolescents on the Internet: A quantitative content analysis of MySpace. , 2008, Journal of adolescence.

[46]  Michele M. Strano.  User Descriptions and Interpretations of Self-Presentation through Facebook Profile Images , 2008 .

[47]  M. Prinstein,et al.  Beyond Homophily: A Decade of Advances in Understanding Peer Influence Processes. , 2011, Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence.

[48]  M. Fisher,et al.  Female intrasexual competition decreases female facial attractiveness , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  D. Buss,et al.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. , 1993, Psychological review.

[50]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  Cultural Suppression of Female Sexuality , 2002 .

[51]  Vladas Griskevicius,et al.  Ovulation leads women to perceive sexy cads as good dads. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  Roberto Toro,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Resistance to Peer Influence in Early Adolescence , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  J. Archer.  Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? , 2009, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[54]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  The Use of Sexually Explicit Internet Material and Its Antecedents: A Longitudinal Comparison of Adolescents and Adults , 2010, Archives of sexual behavior.

[55]  Doreen Rosenthal,et al.  Constructing a Sexual Self: Adolescents' Sexual Self-Perceptions and Sexual Risk-Taking. , 1996 .

[56]  B. Ellis,et al.  The evolution of sexual attraction: Evaluative mechanisms in women. , 1992 .

[57]  T. Valente,et al.  Peer influences: the impact of online and offline friendship networks on adolescent smoking and alcohol use. , 2014, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[58]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Display of health risk behaviors on MySpace by adolescents: prevalence and associations. , 2009, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[59]  C. Darwin.  The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex: INDEX , 1871 .

[60]  D. Buss.  The evolution of human intrasexual competition: tactics of mate attraction. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.