Physical activity classification meets daily life: Review on existing methodologies and open challenges

Recent advances in the MEMS devices make it happen to wirelessly integrate miniature motion capturing devices with Smartphones and to use them in personal health care and physical activity monitoring in daily life. There is no ground truth, though, to measure the physical activity (PA) in daily life and because of this, there is no common validation procedure adapted by the researchers for benchmarking the performance of algorithms for PA classification. The major issue in the existing studies for PA classification is the utilization of structured protocol in a controlled setting or simulated daily environment, which limits their implementation in real life conditions where activities are unplanned and unstructured, both in occurrence and in duration. This study provides a critical review on the validation procedures used for PA classification, types of activities classified and limitations in the exiting studies to implement them in daily life settings. Only those studies are considered which classify PA based on wearable accelerometers as an objective measure. The pros and cons of existing methodologies are highlighted and future possibilities are addressed for the development of a robust PA classification system which is feasible under real life conditions.

[1]  A Moncada-Torres,et al.  Activity classification based on inertial and barometric pressure sensors at different anatomical locations , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[2]  Gaetano Borriello,et al.  A Practical Approach to Recognizing Physical Activities , 2006, Pervasive.

[3]  N. Ridgers,et al.  Assessing free-living physical activity using accelerometry: Practical issues for researchers and practitioners , 2011 .

[4]  Ling Bao,et al.  Activity Recognition from User-Annotated Acceleration Data , 2004, Pervasive.

[5]  Wiebren Zijlstra,et al.  Recommendations for Standardizing Validation Procedures Assessing Physical Activity of Older Persons by Monitoring Body Postures and Movements , 2014, Sensors.

[6]  Ulf Ekelund,et al.  Guide to the assessment of physical activity: Clinical and research applications: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. , 2013, Circulation.

[7]  R. Shephard Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires , 2003, British journal of sports medicine.

[8]  Klaas R. Westerterp,et al.  Assessment of physical activity: a critical appraisal , 2009, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[9]  S. Barquera,et al.  Validity and reliability of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire among adults in Mexico. , 2013, Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health.

[10]  David Howard,et al.  A Comparison of Feature Extraction Methods for the Classification of Dynamic Activities From Accelerometer Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Faicel Chamroukhi,et al.  An Unsupervised Approach for Automatic Activity Recognition Based on Hidden Markov Model Regression , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[12]  H. Busser,et al.  Ambulatory monitoring of physical activity in working situations, a validation study. , 1998, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[13]  Michael L. Littman,et al.  Activity Recognition from Accelerometer Data , 2005, AAAI.

[14]  J. Larry Durstine,et al.  Chronic disease and the link to physical activity , 2013 .

[15]  John Nelson,et al.  Activity recognition with smartphone support. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[16]  Lei Gao,et al.  Evaluation of accelerometer based multi-sensor versus single-sensor activity recognition systems. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[17]  Billur Barshan,et al.  Comparative study on classifying human activities with miniature inertial and magnetic sensors , 2010, Pattern Recognit..

[18]  K. Aminian,et al.  Physical activity monitoring based on accelerometry: validation and comparison with video observation , 1999, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[19]  Dominik Schuldhaus,et al.  Hierarchical, Multi-Sensor Based Classification of Daily Life Activities: Comparison with State-of-the-Art Algorithms Using a Benchmark Dataset , 2013, PloS one.

[20]  M. Granat,et al.  The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities , 2006, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[21]  Klaas R. Westerterp,et al.  Physical activity and physical activity induced energy expenditure in humans: measurement, determinants, and effects , 2013, Front. Physiol..

[22]  U. Ekelund,et al.  A comparison of questionnaire, accelerometer, and pedometer: measures in older people. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.