Response of northern North Atlantic and Atlantic meridional overturning circulation to reduced and enhanced wind stress forcing

Surface wind stress strongly influences Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) variability on interannual time scales. On longer time scales, however, its role in AMOC variations is less clear. Here, we show a nonlinear AMOC response to globally reduced and enhanced wind stress forcing, based on sensitivity experiments with MPI-ESM1.2. Under reduced wind stress forcing, the AMOC strength strongly decreases. In contrast, under enhanced wind stress forcing the AMOC strength increases only in the first decades and then decreases, stabilizing at a value similar to the reference simulation. To reveal possible mechanisms underlying this response, we assess the response of the northern North Atlantic circulation and climate to the changed wind stress forcing. Initially, the response is linear: reduced wind stress forcing weakens the gyre circulation and the associated heat and salt transport, leading to larger winter sea ice extent and a shutdown of subpolar deep convection. In the Nordic Seas, the fresher and lighter subsurface state leads to a decrease in the baroclinic pressure and the overflow strength. Under enhanced wind stress forcing, initially, the opposite is happening. However, eventually, subpolar surface density anomalies are determined by warmer temperature rather than increased salinity, leading to a decrease in surface density and a weakening of subpolar deep convection. The resulting AMOC weakening reduces the Atlantic inflow salinity, and subsequently the Nordic Seas baroclinic pressure and overflow strength. The quasi-equilibrium response of the northern North Atlantic circulation and climate under enhanced wind stress forcing differs from the reference simulation, even though the AMOC strength converges. show a nonlinear response of the AMOC to reduced and enhanced wind stress forcing, based on sensitivity experiments with the MPI-M climate model. Under reduced wind stress forcing, the AMOC strength strongly decreases. In contrast, under enhanced wind stress forcing the AMOC strength increases only initially, then decreases and stabilizes at a value similar to the AMOC strength under unchanged wind stress forcing. The initial linear AMOC response to reduced (enhanced) wind stress forcing involves a shutdown (intensification) of both subpolar deep water formation and export of deep water masses from the Nordic Seas. The afterward different response under enhanced wind stress forcing is mainly caused by the fact that eventually subpolar surface density anomalies are determined by temperature (decrease in density due to warming) rather than salinity anomalies (increase in density due to increased salinity), which leads to a decrease in surface density and to a weakening of subpolar deep water formation. Key to the response of the northern North Atlantic circulation and climate described in our study is the changed wind stress forcing over the North Atlantic. Thus our results indicate possible impacts of a intensification or weakening of the northern hemispheric jet stream and associated North Atlantic storm track on the large-scale North Atlantic circulation and climate.

[1]  J. Jungclaus,et al.  Comparison of ocean vertical mixing schemes in the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM1.2) , 2021 .

[2]  J. Marotzke,et al.  Overturning Response to a Surface Wind Stress Doubling in an Eddying and a Non-Eddying Ocean , 2021, Journal of Physical Oceanography.

[3]  J. Marotzke,et al.  The depth scales of the AMOC on a decadal timescale , 2021 .

[4]  B. Fox‐Kemper,et al.  Resolving and Parameterising the Ocean Mesoscale in Earth System Models , 2020, Current Climate Change Reports.

[5]  M. Lozier,et al.  Reconciling the Relationship Between the AMOC and Labrador Sea in OSNAP Observations and Climate Models , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[6]  C. Heuzé Antarctic Bottom Water and North Atlantic Deep Water in CMIP6 models , 2020, Ocean Science.

[7]  J. Jungclaus,et al.  Multiple drivers of the North Atlantic warming hole , 2020, Nature Climate Change.

[8]  M. Lozier,et al.  Density-compensated overturning in the Labrador Sea , 2020, Nature Geoscience.

[9]  C. Katsman,et al.  Dynamics of Downwelling in an Eddying Marginal Sea: Contrasting the Eulerian and the Isopycnal Perspective , 2019, Journal of Physical Oceanography.

[10]  M. Spall,et al.  Recent Contributions of Theory to Our Understanding of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans.

[11]  G. Danabasoglu,et al.  Local and Downstream Relationships between Labrador Sea Water Volume and North Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation Variability , 2019, Journal of Climate.

[12]  T. Rossby,et al.  Volume, Heat, and Freshwater Divergences in the Subpolar North Atlantic Suggest the Nordic Seas as Key to the State of the Meridional Overturning Circulation , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[13]  J. Jungclaus,et al.  Surface Flux Drivers for the Slowdown of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in a High‐Resolution Global Coupled Climate Model , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[14]  Alexander J. Winkler,et al.  Developments in the MPI‐M Earth System Model version 1.2 (MPI‐ESM1.2) and Its Response to Increasing CO2 , 2019, Journal of advances in modeling earth systems.

[15]  J. Pietrzak,et al.  On the interplay between downwelling, deep convection and mesoscale eddies in the Labrador Sea , 2019, Ocean Modelling.

[16]  L. Houpert,et al.  A sea change in our view of overturning in the subpolar North Atlantic , 2019, Science.

[17]  P. Cessi The Effect of Northern Hemisphere Winds on the Meridional Overturning Circulation and Stratification , 2018, Journal of Physical Oceanography.

[18]  J. Marotzke,et al.  A Higher‐resolution Version of the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI‐ESM1.2‐HR) , 2018, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[19]  J. Jungclaus,et al.  Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM1.2) for High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP) , 2018 .

[20]  C. Heuzé North Atlantic deep water formation and AMOC in CMIP5 models , 2017 .

[21]  J. Toole,et al.  Recent Wind-Driven Variability in Atlantic Water Mass Distribution and Meridional Overturning Circulation , 2017 .

[22]  Jeffery R. Scott,et al.  The dependence of the ocean’s MOC on mesoscale eddy diffusivities: A model study , 2017 .

[23]  Jian Lu,et al.  High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP v1.0) for CMIP6 , 2016 .

[24]  John Marshall,et al.  Observations, inferences, and mechanisms of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation: A review , 2016 .

[25]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization , 2015 .

[26]  E. Chassignet,et al.  Intraseasonal to interannual variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation from eddy-resolving simulations and observations , 2014 .

[27]  Nick Rayner,et al.  EN4: Quality controlled ocean temperature and salinity profiles and monthly objective analyses with uncertainty estimates , 2013 .

[28]  Michael Vellinga,et al.  Multidecadal to Centennial Variability of the AMOC: HadCM3 and a Perturbed Physics Ensemble , 2013 .

[29]  M. Latif,et al.  A mechanism for Atlantic multidecadal variability in the Kiel Climate Model , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[30]  S. Drijfhout,et al.  Is a Decline of AMOC Causing the Warming Hole above the North Atlantic in Observed and Modeled Warming Patterns , 2012 .

[31]  A. Phillips,et al.  Variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation in CCSM4 , 2012 .

[32]  G. Danabasoglu,et al.  Sensitivity of Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation Variability to Parameterized Nordic Sea Overflows in CCSM4 , 2012 .

[33]  K. Speer,et al.  Closure of the meridional overturning circulation through Southern Ocean upwelling , 2012 .

[34]  M. Bentsen,et al.  Mechanisms for decadal scale variability in a simulated Atlantic meridional overturning circulation , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[35]  A. Rosati,et al.  Sensitivity of the North Atlantic Ocean Circulation to an abrupt change in the Nordic Sea overflow in a high resolution global coupled climate model , 2011 .

[36]  J. Marotzke,et al.  Observed and simulated estimates of the meridional overturning circulation at 26.5° N in the Atlantic , 2009 .

[37]  R. Msadek,et al.  Atlantic multidecadal oceanic variability and its influence on the atmosphere in a climate model , 2009 .

[38]  R. Curry,et al.  The role of salinity in the decadal variability of the North Atlantic meridional overturning circulation , 2009 .

[39]  Jean-Marc Molines,et al.  Causes of Interannual–Decadal Variability in the Meridional Overturning Circulation of the Midlatitude North Atlantic Ocean , 2008 .

[40]  G. Danabasoglu On Multidecadal Variability of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in the Community Climate System Model Version 3 , 2008 .

[41]  T. Delworth,et al.  Simulated impact of altered Southern Hemisphere winds on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation , 2008 .

[42]  J. Jungclaus,et al.  Interdecadal variability of the meridional overturning circulation as an ocean internal mode , 2008 .

[43]  Bob Dickson,et al.  Arctic–Subarctic Ocean Fluxes: Defining the Role of the Northern Seas in Climate , 2008 .

[44]  S. Østerhus,et al.  Faroe Bank Channel overflow 1995–2005 , 2007 .

[45]  J. Marotzke,et al.  Observed Flow Compensation Associated with the MOC at 26.5°N in the Atlantic , 2007, Science.

[46]  Detlef Stammer,et al.  Variability of the Meridional Overturning in the North Atlantic from the 50-Year GECCO State Estimation , 2006 .

[47]  M. Latif,et al.  Arctic-North Atlantic Interactions and Multidecadal Variability of the Meridional Overturning Circulation , 2005 .

[48]  A. Köhl Anomalies of Meridional Overturning: Mechanisms in the North Atlantic , 2005 .

[49]  B. Dong,et al.  Mechanism of interdecadal thermohaline circulation variability in a coupled ocean : Atmosphere GCM , 2005 .

[50]  Tianjun Zhou,et al.  Simulated variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation , 2004 .

[51]  D. Stammer,et al.  The Sensitivity of the Greenland–Scotland Ridge Overflow to Forcing Changes , 2003 .

[52]  Jeffery R. Scott,et al.  Sensitivity of basinwide meridional overturning to diapycnal diffusion and remote wind forcing in an idealized Atlantic-Southern Ocean geometry , 2003 .

[53]  Carsten Eden,et al.  Mechanism of Interannual to Decadal Variability of the North Atlantic Circulation , 2001 .

[54]  U. Mikolajewicz,et al.  The role of the individual air-sea flux components in CO2-induced changes of the ocean's circulation and climate , 2000 .

[55]  S. Häkkinen,et al.  On the relationship between dense water formation and the “Meridional Overturning Cell” in the North Atlantic Ocean , 1999 .

[56]  Wallace S. Broecker,et al.  PALEOCEAN CIRCULATION DURING THE LAST DEGLACIATION : A BIPOLAR SEESAW ? , 1998 .

[57]  A. Adcroft,et al.  Representation of Topography by Shaved Cells in a Height Coordinate Ocean Model , 1997 .

[58]  E. Maier‐Reimer,et al.  The Hamburg Ocean primitive equation model - HOPE , 1996 .

[59]  R. Dickson,et al.  The production of North Atlantic Deep Water: Sources, rates, and pathways , 1994 .

[60]  B.,et al.  Effect of Drake Passage on the global thermohaline circulation , 1994 .

[61]  Syukuro Manabe,et al.  Interdecadal Variations of the Thermohaline Circulation in a Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model , 1993 .