Implementation of wind power in the Norwegian market; the reason why some of the best wind resources in Europe were not utilised by 2010

Norway has some of the best wind resources in Europe. In 1999, the Norwegian Parliament committed to attain an annual onshore wind power production goal of 3.0TWh by 2010; however, in 2010, onshore wind power production measured only 1.0TWh. This article discusses the reasons that this goal was not achieved. The analysis addresses the key figures on the strategic, tactical and operational levels. This model is combined with a time line that seeks to define when different actors should have secured concessions11Official approvals. and funding to achieve the goal. After introducing the time line, a list of questions is introduced for these key actors. The three-level model, the time line and the questions constitute the analytical framework. Explanations for the failure to achieve the goal may be identified on all three levels. However, the primary explanatory factors were political uncertainty in the support scheme and wind power's role in the energy market in general; both of these factors are identified on the strategic level. Uncertainty on the strategic level influenced the lower levels, which led to bottlenecks in the concession process and jittery investors who thought that the risk of investment in wind power was too high.

[1]  O. Rentz,et al.  Policy instruments fostering wind energy projects--a multi-perspective evaluation approach , 2002 .

[2]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany , 2006 .

[3]  Anna Bergek,et al.  Levelling the playing field? The influence of national wind power planning instruments on conflicts of interests in a Swedish county , 2010 .

[4]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Phasing in wind-power in Norway: Network congestion and crowding-out of hydropower , 2008 .

[5]  J. Buen,et al.  Danish and Norwegian wind industry: The relationship between policy instruments, innovation and diffusion , 2006 .

[6]  Tarla Rai Peterson,et al.  Socio-Political Evaluation of Energy Deployment (SPEED): An integrated research framework analyzing energy technology deployment , 2008 .

[7]  V. Dinica Support systems for the diffusion of renewable energy technologies—an investor perspective , 2006 .

[8]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology , 2006 .

[9]  C. Chew‐Graham,et al.  Work package 2 , 2014 .

[10]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Wind power planning and permitting : comparative perspectives from the Nordic countries , 2010 .

[11]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  EU renewable energy support policy: Faith or facts? , 2009 .

[12]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  The problem of windfarm location: A social multi-criteria evaluation framework , 2007 .

[13]  Richard L. Ottinger,et al.  Compendium of Sustainable Energy Laws: Directive 2001/77/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2001 on the Promotion of Electricity Produced from Renewable Energy Sources in the Internal Electricity Market , 2005 .

[14]  N. Meyer European schemes for promoting renewables in liberalised markets , 2003 .