Projected health impact of the Los Angeles City living wage ordinance

Study objective: To estimate the relative health effects of the income and health insurance provisions of the Los Angeles City living wage ordinance. Setting and participants: About 10 000 employees of city contractors are subject to the Los Angeles City living wage ordinance, which establishes an annually adjusted minimum wage ($7.99 per hour in July 2002) and requires employers to contribute $1.25 per hour worked towards employees’ health insurance, or, if health insurance is not provided, to add this amount to wages. Design: As part of a comprehensive health impact assessment (HIA), we used estimates of the effects of health insurance and income on mortality from the published literature to construct a model to estimate and compare potential reductions in mortality attributable to the increases in wage and changes in health insurance status among workers covered by the Los Angeles City living wage ordinance. Results: The model predicts that the ordinance currently reduces mortality by 1.4 deaths per year per 10 000 workers at a cost of $27.5 million per death prevented. If the ordinance were modified so that all uninsured workers received health insurance, mortality would be reduced by eight deaths per year per 10 000 workers at a cost of $3.4 million per death prevented. Conclusions: The health insurance provisions of the ordinance have the potential to benefit the health of covered workers far more cost effectively than the wage provisions of the ordinance. This analytical model can be adapted and used in other health impact assessments of related policy actions that might affect either income or access to health insurance in the affected population.

[1]  S. Ettner New evidence on the relationship between income and health. , 1996, Journal of health economics.

[2]  R. Fehr,et al.  Environmental health impact assessment: evaluation of a ten-step model. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[3]  J D Graham,et al.  Residential Building Codes, Affordability, and Health Protection: A Risk‐Tradeoff Approach , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  David Fairris The Impact of Living Wages on Employers: A Control Group Analysis of the Los Angeles Ordinance , 2005 .

[5]  R. Pollin,et al.  The Living Wage: Building A Fair Economy , 2000 .

[6]  E M Faustman,et al.  Use of Quality‐Adjusted Life Year Weights with Dose‐Response Models for Public Health Decisions: A Case Study of the Risks and Benefits of Fish Consumption , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  M. Katz,et al.  Estimation of health benefits from a local living wage ordinance. , 2001, American journal of public health.

[8]  Greg J. Duncan,et al.  How much does childhood poverty affect the life chances of children , 1998 .

[9]  L. Green,et al.  Setting the Stage for Health Impact Assessment , 1997, Journal of public health policy.

[10]  P. Sorlie,et al.  A comparison of the relationships of education and income with mortality: the National Longitudinal Mortality Study. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[11]  C. Ross,et al.  Does medical insurance contribute to socioeconomic differentials in health? , 2000, The Milbank quarterly.

[12]  M. Tsechkovski,et al.  WHO Regional Office for Europe , 1993, The Lancet.

[13]  M. Gold,et al.  Health Insurance and Mortality: Evidence From a National Cohort , 1993 .

[14]  P. Ostlin,et al.  Using risk analysis in Health Impact Assessment: the impact of different relative risks for men and women in different socio-economic groups. , 2004, Health policy.

[15]  B J Ale,et al.  The assessment and management of third party risk around a major airport. , 2000, Journal of hazardous materials.

[16]  J M Lepkowski,et al.  Socioeconomic factors, health behaviors, and mortality: results from a nationally representative prospective study of US adults. , 1998, JAMA.

[17]  R. Pollin,et al.  Economic Analysis of Santa Monica Living Wage Proposal , 2000 .

[18]  J. Kemm,et al.  Can health impact assessment fulfil the expectations it raises? , 2000, Public health.

[19]  D. Neumark How Living Wage Laws Affect Low-Wage Workers and Low-Income Families , 2002 .

[20]  P. Sorlie,et al.  Mortality in the uninsured compared with that in persons with public and private health insurance. , 1994, Archives of internal medicine.

[21]  R. Williams Lower socioeconomic status and increased mortality: early childhood roots and the potential for successful interventions. , 1998, JAMA.

[22]  G. Duncan,et al.  Family poverty, welfare reform, and child development. , 2000, Child development.

[23]  Laurie M. Anderson,et al.  A Framework for Evidenced‐Based Reviews of Interventions for Supportive Social Environments , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[24]  M Joffe,et al.  A framework for the evidence base to support Health Impact Assessment , 2002, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[25]  A Stevens,et al.  Prospective health impact assessment: pitfalls, problems, and possible ways forward , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  J Mindell,et al.  What do we need for robust, quantitative health impact assessment? , 2001, Journal of public health medicine.