The Use of Psychophysical Tuning Curves to Explore Dead Regions in the Cochlea

Objective “Dead regions” are regions in the cochlea with no functioning inner hair cells (IHCs) and/or neurons. Amplification (using a hearing aid) over a frequency range corresponding to a dead region may not be beneficial and may even impair speech intelligibility. The objective of this article is to illustrate the use of psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) as a tool for investigating dead regions and to illustrate the variety of audiogram configurations that can be associated with dead regions. We explore the influence of signal level and signal frequency to test the hypothesis that the frequency at the tip of the tuning curve defines the boundary of the dead region. Design PTCs were measured for five subjects with sensorineural hearing loss who were suspected of having dead regions. One had a relatively “flat” loss, one had a mild mid-frequency loss and three had high-frequency losses, varying in severity from 70 dB to more than 120 dB. For each PTC, the level and frequency of the sinusoidal signal were fixed, and the level of a narrowband noise masker needed just to mask the signal was determined as a function of the masker frequency. When the signal falls in a frequency region that is not “dead,” the signal is detected via IHCs with characteristic frequencies (CFs) at or close to the signal frequency. In such a case, the tip of the PTC (the masker frequency at which the masker level is lowest) lies at or close to the signal frequency. When a dead region is present, the signal is detected via IHCs with CFs different from that of the signal frequency. In such a case, the tip of the PTC is shifted away from the signal frequency. Results PTCs with frequency-shifted tips (indicative of dead regions) were found for all subjects. The frequencies at the tips sometimes decreased slightly with increasing signal level. For the subject with a relatively flat loss, PTCs with tips close to 3000 Hz were obtained for signal frequencies of 400, 1000 and 1500 Hz. A PTC with a tip at 5000 Hz was found for a signal frequency of 6000 Hz. These results suggest that this subject had an “island” of surviving IHCs and neurons with CFs ranging from 3000 to 5000 Hz, with extensive dead regions on either side. For the subject with a mid-frequency loss, the pattern of results suggested a mid-frequency dead region. For the subjects with high-frequency loss, the results suggested the presence of high-frequency dead regions, in one case starting at a frequency where absolute thresholds were only slightly higher than normal. Conclusions PTCs can be used to detect and delimit dead regions. Often, the frequency at the tip of the PTC can be used to define approximately one boundary of the dead region. However, the detection of beats can affect the shape of the PTC around the tip when the signal frequency lies just inside the dead region. The level of the signal can also have some effect on the frequency at the tip of the PTC. Very low signal levels can lead to variable results. Dead regions can start at frequencies where absolute thresholds are near normal.

[1]  R. L. Wegel,et al.  The Auditory Masking of One Pure Tone by Another and its Probable Relation to the Dynamics of the Inner Ear , 1924 .

[2]  R. R. Riesz Differential Intensity Sensitivity of the Ear for Pure Tones , 1928 .

[3]  H. Hake,et al.  On the Masking Pattern of a Simple Auditory Stimulus , 1950 .

[4]  Arnold M. Small,et al.  Pure‐Tone Masking , 1959 .

[5]  B. Johansson,et al.  The Use of the Transposer for the Management of the Deaf Child , 1966 .

[6]  E Villchur,et al.  Signal processing to improve speech intelligibility in perceptive deafness. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  L. Vogten Pure-Tone Masking: A New Result from a New Method , 1974 .

[8]  B. Moore Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  L. Vogten,et al.  Simultaneous pure-tone masking: the dependence of masking asymmetries on intensity. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Kenneth E. Hawker A normal mode theory of acoustic Doppler effects in the oceanic waveguide , 1979 .

[11]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  Psychophysical tuning curves: Restricting the listening band to the signal region , 1979 .

[12]  A R Thornton,et al.  Low-frequency hearing loss: perception of filtered speech, psychophysical tuning curves, and masking. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  B C Moore,et al.  Off-frequency listening: effects on psychoacoustical tuning curves obtained in simultaneous and forward masking. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  M Velmans,et al.  The acceptability of spectrum-preserving and spectrum-destroying transposition to severely hearing-impaired listeners. , 1983, British journal of audiology.

[15]  A J Houtsma,et al.  Tuning curves and pitch matches in a listener with a unilateral, low-frequency hearing loss. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  D A Nelson,et al.  Pure tone pitch perception and low-frequency hearing loss. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  B. Engström Fusion of stereocilia on inner hair cells in man and in the rabbit, rat and guinea pig. , 1984, Scandinavian audiology.

[18]  B. Moore,et al.  Refining the measurement of psychophysical tuning curves. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  B C Moore,et al.  Improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise produced by two-channel compression hearing aids. , 1985, British journal of audiology.

[20]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[21]  A. Thornton,et al.  Low‐Frequency Sensorineural Loss: Clinical Evaluation and Implications for Hearing Aid Fitting , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[22]  J Jerger,et al.  Comparison of performance with frequency transposition hearing aids and conventional hearing aids. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[23]  B C Moore,et al.  Use of a loudness model for hearing-aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids. , 1998, British journal of audiology.

[24]  K J Munro,et al.  Balancing the caloric-induced nystagmus velocity with cold air and water. , 1998, British journal of audiology.

[25]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Masking patterns for sinusoidal and narrow-band noise maskers. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  C. Turner,et al.  High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  B C Moore,et al.  Masking patterns for sinusoidal and narrow-band noise maskers. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  H J McDermott,et al.  Improvements in speech perception with use of the AVR TranSonic frequency-transposing hearing aid. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[29]  B C Moore,et al.  Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression. , 1999, British journal of audiology.

[30]  R R Hurtig,et al.  Proportional frequency compression of speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  B C Moore,et al.  Inter-relationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Speech audibility for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. , 1999, American journal of audiology.

[33]  B C Moore,et al.  Further evaluation of a model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  B. Moore,et al.  A Test for the Diagnosis of Dead Regions in the Cochlea , 2000, British journal of audiology.

[35]  Kohlrausch,et al.  The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  B. Moore Dead Regions in the Cochlea: Diagnosis, Perceptual Consequences, and Implications for the Fitting of Hearing Aids , 2001, Trends in amplification.

[37]  B. Moore,et al.  Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  B. Moore,et al.  The relative role of beats and combination tones in determining the shapes of masking patterns: II. Hearing-impaired listeners , 2002, Hearing Research.