Inter‐ and intragranular delta phase quantitative characterization in Inconel 718 by means of image analysis

This paper describes an image processing method for discriminating the inter‐ and intragranular delta phase precipitates in Inconel 718 (IN 718). The successive practical operations and the motivations of their choices are presented in detail. The method was applied to IN 718 specimens heat treated with different parameters to produce microstructures containing various amounts of both types of precipitates. They were characterized by electron microscopy in backscattered electron imaging. The main difficulty arose from the fact that the brightness distributions of inter‐ and intragranular precipitates partially overlap. Additional information on their morphology and their spatial distribution had to be exploited in order to differentiate them. The shape and the orientation of the precipitates were evaluated using the structure tensor, an operator that quantifies the directionality of the intensity distribution in an image. The distance between parallel precipitates was also used as an additional property to identify clusters of intragranular precipitates.

[1]  Srikumar Banerjee,et al.  Precipitation of the δ-Ni3Nb phase in two nickel base superalloys , 1988 .

[2]  H. Aaronson,et al.  Overview no. 57 Morphology, crystallography and kinetics of sympathetic nucleation , 1987 .

[3]  F. N. van de Vosse,et al.  Experimental investigation of collagen waviness and orientation in the arterial adventitia using confocal laser scanning microscopy , 2011, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[4]  Maxime Moreaud,et al.  Three-dimensional microtomographic study of Widmanstätten microstructures in an alpha/beta titanium alloy , 2008 .

[5]  Robert P. Dougherty,et al.  Computing Local Thickness of 3D Structures with ImageJ , 2007, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[6]  Michael Unser,et al.  Effect of Aging on Elastin Functionality in Human Cerebral Arteries , 2008, Stroke.

[7]  Luc Vincent,et al.  Morphological grayscale reconstruction in image analysis: applications and efficient algorithms , 1993, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[8]  W. C. Liu,et al.  Effect of the δ phase on the hot deformation behavior of Inconel 718 , 2005 .

[9]  D Jeulin,et al.  A quantitative morphological analysis of nanostructured ceria–silica composite catalysts , 2008, Journal of microscopy.

[10]  D. Jeulin,et al.  SEGMENTATION OF 2D AND 3D TEXTURES FROM ESTIMATES OF THE LOCAL ORIENTATION , 2011 .

[11]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[12]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  A new method for the model‐independent assessment of thickness in three‐dimensional images , 1997 .

[13]  Chun-hung Li,et al.  Minimum cross entropy thresholding , 1993, Pattern Recognit..

[14]  Liu Wei,et al.  Delta phase precipitation in Inconel 718 , 2004 .

[15]  M. Yao,et al.  Dissolution kinetics of δ phase and its influence on the notch sensitivity of Inconel 718 , 2007 .

[16]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.