Optimization of Fuel Cell System Operating Conditions for Fuel Cell Vehicles

Proton Exchange Membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) technology for use in fuel cell vehicles and other applications has been intensively developed in recent decades. Besides the fuel cell stack, air and fuel control and thermal and water management are major challenges in the development of the fuel cell for vehicle applications. The air supply system can have a major impact on overall system efficiency. In this paper a fuel cell system model for optimizing system operating conditions was developed which includes the transient dynamics of the air system with varying back pressure. Compared to the conventional fixed back pressure operation, the optimal operation discussed in this paper can achieve higher system efficiency over the full load range. Finally, the model is applied as part of a dynamic forward-looking vehicle model of a load-following direct hydrogen fuel cell vehicle to explore the energy economy optimization potential of fuel cell vehicles.

[1]  D. Friedman,et al.  Maximizing Direct-Hydrogen PEM Fuel Cell Vehicle Efficiency – Is Hybridization Necessary? , 1999 .

[2]  Dave Reuter,et al.  Control of a Fuel Cell Air Supply Module (ASM) , 2004 .

[3]  Joshua Cunningham,et al.  A Comparison of High-Pressure and Low-Pressure Operation of PEM Fuel Cell Systems , 2001 .

[4]  Ilya V. Kolmanovsky,et al.  Predictive energy management of a power-split hybrid electric vehicle , 2009, 2009 American Control Conference.

[5]  Anna G. Stefanopoulou,et al.  Modeling and control for PEM fuel cell stack system , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[6]  Stefan Pischinger,et al.  Analysis of dynamic requirements for fuel cell systems for vehicle applications , 2006 .

[7]  Carl-Johan Sjöstedt,et al.  The design of modular dynamical fluid simulation systems , 2005 .

[8]  T. Springer,et al.  Modeling and Experimental Diagnostics in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells , 1993 .

[9]  Karl-Heinz Hauer,et al.  A dynamic simulation tool for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles , 2005 .

[10]  Frano Barbir,et al.  Design and operational characteristics of automotive PEM fuel cell stacks , 2000 .

[11]  David J. Friedman,et al.  Requirements for a Flexible and Realistic Air Supply Model for Incorporation into a Fuel Cell Vehicle (FCV) System Simulation , 1999 .

[12]  Karl-Heinz Hauer,et al.  The Hybridized Fuel Cell Vehicle Model of the University of California, Davis , 2001 .

[13]  Karl-Heinz Hauer,et al.  A Comparison of Energy Use for a Direct-Hydrogen Hybrid Versus a Direct-Hydrogen Load-Following Fuel Cell Vehicle , 2003 .

[14]  Huei Peng,et al.  SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS OF TRANSIENT FUEL CELL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE BASED ON A DYNAMIC REACTANT FLOW MODEL , 2002 .

[15]  Anthony Eggert,et al.  Balancing Stack, Air Supply, and Water/Thermal Management Demands for an Indirect Methanol PEM Fuel Cell System , 2001 .

[16]  Hengbing Zhao,et al.  Modeling and Optimization of PEMFC Systems and its Application to Direct Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles , 2008 .

[17]  A. Miotti,et al.  Control-oriented model for an automotive PEM fuel cell system with imbedded 1+1D membrane water transport , 2005, 2005 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.

[18]  T. Springer,et al.  Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Model , 1991 .

[19]  Anna G. Stefanopoulou,et al.  Control of Fuel Cell Power Systems , 2004 .

[20]  Rajesh K. Ahluwalia,et al.  Fuel cell systems for transportation: Status and trends , 2008 .

[21]  Mark W. Verbrugge,et al.  A Mathematical Model of the Solid‐Polymer‐Electrolyte Fuel Cell , 1992 .