Analyzing spatiotemporal variability of heterotrophic soil respiration at the field scale using orthogonal functions

Abstract Soil CO 2 efflux was measured with a closed chamber system along a 180 m transect on a bare soil field characterized by a gentle slope and a gradient in soil properties at 28 days within a year. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to extract the most important patterns (empirical orthogonal functions, EOFs) of the underlying spatiotemporal variability in CO 2 efflux. These patterns were analyzed with respect to their geostatistical properties, their relation to soil parameters obtained from laboratory analysis, and the relation of their loading time series to temporal variability of soil temperature and moisture. A particular focus was set on the analysis of the overfitting behaviour of two statistical models describing the spatiotemporal efflux variability: i) a multiple regression model using the k first EOFs of soil properties to predict the n first EOFs of efflux, which were then used to obtain a prediction of efflux on all days and points; and ii) a modified multiple regression model based on re-sorting of the EOFs based on their expected predictive power. It was demonstrated that PCA helped to separate meaningful spatial correlation patterns and unexplained variability in datasets of soil CO 2 efflux measurements. The two PCA analyses suggested that only about half of the total variance of efflux could be related to field-scale spatial variability of soil properties, while the other half was “noise” attributed to temporal fluctuations on the minute time scale and short-range spatial heterogeneity on the decimetre scale. The most important spatial pattern in CO 2 efflux was clearly related to soil moisture and the driving soil physical properties. Temperature, on the other hand, was the most important factor controlling the temporal variability of the spatial average of soil respiration.

[1]  Elizabeth Pattey,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of soil respiration in agricultural fields , 1991 .

[2]  O. P. MEdinA,et al.  IRON OXIDE REMOVAL FROM SOILS AND CLAYS BY A DITHIONITE-CITRATE SYSTEM BUFFERED WITH SODIUM BICARBONATE by , 2006 .

[3]  Alessandro Cescatti,et al.  Spatial variability and optimal sampling strategy of soil respiration , 2008 .

[4]  L. Weihermüller,et al.  Measurement depth effects on the apparent temperature sensitivity of soil respiration in field studies , 2008 .

[5]  B. Minasny,et al.  The Matérn function as a general model for soil variograms , 2005 .

[6]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Organic matter in small mesopores in sediments and soils , 2004 .

[7]  A. Thomson,et al.  A global database of soil respiration data , 2010 .

[8]  Jan Vanderborght,et al.  Characterization and Understanding of Bare Soil Respiration Spatial Variability at Plot Scale , 2009 .

[9]  Karl Schneider,et al.  Analysis of surface soil moisture patterns in agricultural landscapes using Empirical Orthogonal Functions , 2009 .

[10]  Jeffrey D. Niemann,et al.  Generation of soil moisture patterns at the catchment scale by EOF interpolation , 2007 .

[11]  Liukang Xu,et al.  On maintaining pressure equilibrium between a soil CO2 flux chamber and the ambient air , 2006 .

[12]  B. McGlynn,et al.  Complex terrain leads to bidirectional responses of soil respiration to inter‐annual water availability , 2012 .

[13]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Global Convergence in the Temperature Sensitivity of Respiration at Ecosystem Level , 2010, Science.

[14]  G. T. Pereira,et al.  Short-term temporal changes in the spatial variability model of CO2 emissions from a Brazilian bare soil , 2000 .

[15]  Donald A. Jackson,et al.  How many principal components? stopping rules for determining the number of non-trivial axes revisited , 2005, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[16]  W. Amelung,et al.  Minimisation of organic matter disruption during particle-size fractionation of grassland epipedons , 1999 .

[17]  E. Davidson,et al.  Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change , 2006, Nature.

[18]  J. M. Junior,et al.  Variabilidade espacial da emissão de CO2 em Latossolos sob cultivo de cana-de-açúcar em diferentes sistemas de manejo , 2008 .

[19]  Sudhanshu K. Mishra Representation-Constrained Canonical Correlation Analysis: A Hybridization of Canonical Correlation and Principal Component Analyses , 2009 .

[20]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Summary for Policymakers , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.

[21]  M. Briones Uncertainties related to the temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition , 2009 .

[22]  M. Leclerc,et al.  Assessment of the soil CO2 gradient method for soil CO2 efflux measurements: comparison of six models in the calculation of the relative gas diffusion coefficient , 2010 .

[23]  Keith E. Muller,et al.  Understanding Canonical Correlation through the General Linear Model and Principal Components , 1982 .

[24]  I. Jolliffe A Note on the Use of Principal Components in Regression , 1982 .

[25]  Vincent R. Gray Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[26]  Devin L. Wixon,et al.  Complexity, climate change and soil carbon: A systems approach to microbial temperature response , 2009 .

[27]  Johan Alexander Huisman,et al.  Mapping the spatial variation of soil water content at the field scale with different ground penetrating radar techniques , 2007 .

[28]  H. Hotelling Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. , 1933 .

[29]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines , 1980 .

[30]  Karl Schneider,et al.  Temporal Downscaling of Soil Carbon Dioxide Efflux Measurements Based on Time‐Stable Spatial Patterns , 2011 .

[31]  W. Kutsch,et al.  Dependence of the Q10 values on the depth of the soil temperature measuring point , 2007, Plant and Soil.

[32]  H. Vereecken,et al.  A geostatistical approach to the field-scale pattern of heterotrophic soil CO2 emission using covariates , 2012, Biogeochemistry.

[33]  W. Amelung,et al.  Particulate Organic Matter at the Field Scale: Rapid Acquisition Using Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy , 2010 .

[34]  H. Hotelling The most predictable criterion. , 1935 .