Analysis of factors influencing length of stay in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVES Length of stay (LOS) is a key measure of emergency department (ED) throughput and a marker of overcrowding. Time studies that assess key ED processes will help clarify the causes of patient care delays and prolonged LOS. The objectives of this study were to identify and quantify the principal ED patient care time intervals, and to measure the impact of important service processes (laboratory testing, imaging and consultation) on LOS for patients in different triage levels. METHODS In this retrospective review, conducted at a large urban tertiary care teaching hospital and trauma centre, investigators reviewed the records of 1047 consecutive patients treated during a continuous 7-day period in January 1999. Key data were recorded, including patient characteristics, ED process times, tests performed, consultations and overall ED LOS. Of the 1047 patient records, 153 (14.6%) were excluded from detailed analysis because of incomplete documentation. Process times were determined and stratified by triage level, using the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to determine which factors were most strongly associated with prolonged LOS. RESULTS Patients in intermediate triage Levels III and IV generally had the longest waiting times to nurse and physician assessment, and the longest ED lengths of stay. CTAS triage levels predicted laboratory and imaging utilization as well as consultation rate. The use of diagnostic imaging and laboratory tests was associated with longer LOS, varying with the specific tests ordered. Specialty consultation was also associated with prolonged LOS, and this effect was highly variable depending on the service consulted. CONCLUSIONS Triage level, investigations and consultations are important independent variables that influence ED LOS. Future research is necessary to determine how these and other factors can be incorporated into a model for predicting LOS. Improved information systems will facilitate similar ED time studies to assess key processes, lengths of stay and clinical efficiency.

[1]  M. Bullard,et al.  Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale implementation guidelines. , 2004, CJEM.

[2]  Donald A Redelmeier,et al.  Urban emergency department overcrowding: defining the problem and eliminating misconceptions. , 2002, CJEM.

[3]  D. Kyriacou,et al.  A 5-year time study analysis of emergency department patient care efficiency. , 1999, Annals of emergency medicine.

[4]  P. G. Zimmermann Enhancing patient flow , 1998 .

[5]  H. Rayner Length of stay. Taking a day off. , 1998, The Health service journal.

[6]  F. Lau,et al.  Waiting time in an urban accident and emergency department--a way to improve it. , 1997, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.

[7]  J. Christenson,et al.  Does reduced length of stay decrease the number of emergency department patients who leave without seeing a physician? , 1997, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[8]  J. Chodosh,et al.  Do admitted patients held in the emergency department impact the throughput of treat-and-release patients? , 1996, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[9]  H. Simon,et al.  "Fast tracking" patients in an urban pediatric emergency department. , 1996, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[10]  J. Christenson,et al.  Continuous quality improvement reduces length of stay for fast-track patients in an emergency department. , 1996, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[11]  D Braly,et al.  Seek alternatives via simulation software. , 1995, Health management technology.

[12]  J. Christenson,et al.  Use of continuous quality improvement to facilitate patient flow through the triage and fast-track areas of an emergency department. , 1995, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[13]  A. Levine,et al.  Factors affecting ED length-of-stay in surgical critical care patients. , 1995, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[14]  L. Purnell Reducing waiting time in emergency department triage. , 1995, Nursing management.

[15]  D. Cardello Monitoring staffing variances and length of stay. , 1995, Nursing management.

[16]  S. Shea,et al.  Emergency department patient throughput: a continuous quality improvement approach to length of stay. , 1994, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[17]  Michael Pinedo Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms, and Systems , 1994 .

[18]  D W Baker,et al.  Patients who leave emergency departments without being seen by a physician: magnitude of the problem in Los Angeles County. , 1994, Annals of emergency medicine.

[19]  R E Fromm,et al.  Critical care in the emergency department: A time‐based study , 1993, Critical care medicine.

[20]  L. LeBlanc,et al.  Modeling emergency department operations using advanced computer simulation systems. , 1989, Annals of emergency medicine.

[21]  C. Saunders,et al.  Time study of patient movement through the emergency department: sources of delay in relation to patient acuity. , 1987, Annals of emergency medicine.

[22]  J.E.P. Simpson Making Do , 1977, The Lancet.

[23]  Joint Position Statement on emergency department overcrowding. , 2001, CJEM.