Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams

Virtual teams, i.e., work groups in which members collaborate from distant locations predominantly based on electronic communication media, are increasingly introduced in organizations due to new opportunities of electronic communication media and recent trends of globalization and teamwork. Among the main challenges of virtual teams is the maintenance of high work motivation due to reduced face-to-face interaction. The current study examined whether these motivational challenges can be compensated by the experienced interdependence within virtual teams. Consistent with our expectations, the result of a field study with 31 virtual teams showed that management practices related to goal, task, and outcome interdependence correlated with the effectiveness of the teams. In more effective teams, quality of goal setting processes and task interdependence were higher compared to less effective teams. Positive effects of task interdependence were particularly present during the first year of virtual teamwork. Moreover, the use of team-based rewards as operationalization of outcome interdependence was also positively related with team effectiveness. Further analyses revealed that the positive effects of these management practices were partially mediated by motivational processes of the team members. Implications for successful virtual teamwork are discussed.

[1]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation Gains in Computer‐Supported Groups1 , 2003 .

[2]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[3]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Quality of management by objectives, task-related stressors, and non-task-related stressors as predictors of stress and job satisfaction among teleworkers , 2003 .

[4]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  A Typology of Virtual Teams , 2002 .

[5]  M. Turner.  GROUPS AT WORK: THEORY AND RESEARCH , 2002 .

[6]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Management virtueller Teams , 2002 .

[7]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  Groups, Technology, and Time , 2002 .

[8]  R. Spears,et al.  Knowing Me, Knowing You: Anonymity Effects on Social Identity Processes within Groups , 2001 .

[9]  S. Karau,et al.  Understanding individual motivation in groups: The collective effort model. , 2001 .

[10]  W. Karwowski.  International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors , 2001 .

[11]  Deborah L. Duarte,et al.  Mastering Virtual Teams , 2000 .

[12]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  On the Elusive Search for Motivation Gains in Groups: Insights from the Collective Effort Model , 2000 .

[13]  N. Kerr,et al.  Exploring the Köhler Motivation Gain Effect: Impression Management and Spontaneous Goal Setting , 2000 .

[14]  G Hertel,et al.  Motivation gains in performance groups: paradigmatic and theoretical developments on the Köhler effect. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[16]  Werner B. Korte,et al.  Rahmenbedingungen für Electronic Commerce: Status Quo und Handlungsbedarf , 2000 .

[17]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, a n d M e t h o d s i n Organizations Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2022 .

[18]  Terri R. Kurtzberg,et al.  Long and Short Routes to Success in Electronically Mediated Negotiations: Group Affiliations and Good Vibrations. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[19]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Communication Patterns as Determinants of Organizational Identification in a Virtual Organization , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[20]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[21]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Data analysis in social psychology. , 1998 .

[22]  Gerald E. Ledford,et al.  A HIERARCHICAL CONSTRUCT OF SELF‐MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO QUALITY OF WORK LIFE AND PERCEIVED WORK GROUP EFFECTIVENESS , 1997 .

[23]  George P. Baker,et al.  Incentives and cooperation: the joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance , 1997 .

[24]  R. Liden,et al.  Task Interdependence as a Moderator of the Relation Between Group Control and Performance , 1997 .

[25]  D. H. Saphiere.  Productive behaviors of global business teams , 1996 .

[26]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Invoking Social Comparison to Improve Electronic Brainstorming: Beyond Anonymity , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  W. V. Eerde,et al.  Vroom's expectancy models and work-related criteria: A meta-analysis , 1996 .

[28]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[29]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  PERCEIVED INTRAGROUP VARIABILITY AS A FUNCTION OF GROUP STATUS AND IDENTIFICATION , 1995 .

[30]  R. Wageman.  Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[31]  J. R. Aiello,et al.  Electronic performance monitoring and social context: impact on productivity and stress. , 1995, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  S. Snell,et al.  Strategic Compensation for Integrated Manufacturing: The Moderating Effects of Jobs and Organizational Inertia , 1994 .

[33]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[34]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Social Loafing: a Meta-analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .

[35]  C. Judd,et al.  Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  L. James,et al.  rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. , 1993 .

[37]  Paul R. Yost,et al.  Potency in groups: articulating a construct. , 1993, The British journal of social psychology.

[38]  M. Murray,et al.  Health beliefs, locus of control, emotional control and women's cancer screening behaviour. , 1993, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[39]  J. Shepperd.  Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis. , 1993 .

[40]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Size and Anonymity Effects on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation , 1992 .

[41]  Hal B. Gregersen,et al.  Task interdependence and extrarole behavior : a test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility , 1991 .

[42]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[43]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Impact of management by objectives on organizational productivity. , 1991 .

[44]  E. Weldon,et al.  Processes that mediate the relationship between a group goal and improved group performance. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  R. Spears,et al.  De‐individuation and group polarization in computer‐mediated communication , 1990 .

[46]  B. Shamir,et al.  Calculations, Values, and Identities: The Sources of Collectivistic Work Motivation , 1990 .

[47]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Interrater reliability coefficients cannot be computed when only one stimulus is rated. , 1989 .

[48]  Steven D. Jones,et al.  Effects of group feedback, goal setting, and incentives on organizational productivity. , 1988 .

[49]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[50]  N. Kerr.  Motivation losses in small groups: a social dilemma analysis , 1983 .

[51]  L. James.  Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. , 1982 .

[52]  George S. Odiorne,et al.  MBO II: A System of Managerial Leadership for the 80s , 1979 .

[53]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychology Review.

[54]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[55]  Melvin J. Kimmel,et al.  Twenty Years of Experimental Gaming: Critique,Synthesis, and Suggestions for the Future , 1977 .

[56]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[57]  J. W. Atkinson.  Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. , 1957, Psychological review.

[58]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .