Comparison of Time-Domain Impedance Boundary Conditions for Lined Duct Flows

impedance of liners. This part of the model, however, is limited to single frequency sound source in its present form. The EHR is based on the z‐transformation of the corresponding impedance function for the Extended Helmholtz Resonator in the frequency‐domain. The implementations of the two models in the numerical simulation tool with the DRP scheme are discussed in details. The results from the both models in general agree notably well with each other. However, in one case, the results from the two models dier significantly due to the presence of strongly attenuated modes, which renders the approximations of the EFI invalid. The validation and verification of both models are carried out for the latest NASA impedance tube experiment and the generic aero‐engine frequency domain results of Rienstra and Eversman. In addition, an impedance eduction technique based on the EHR and the optimization process has been developed. This further extends applications of the time‐domain models. The simultaneous optimization of all frequencies considered in the NASA’s impedance tube experiments results in a physically reasonable set of parameters for the EHR. The fitted terminal impedances and the measured mean flow profiles are used for the impedance eduction. The numerical results of both models for the generic aero‐engine inlet test case with higher azimuthal modes also compare well if the same flow assumptions and eigenvalues are used as for the frequency domain methods. Overall both models give a similar physical behavior, but the EHR requires smaller time steps in the case of small face sheet reactances.

[1]  Yusuf Özyörük,et al.  Time-Domain Calculation of Sound Propagation in Lined Ducts with Sheared Flows , 1999 .

[2]  Walter Eversman,et al.  A numerical comparison between the multiple-scales and finite-element solution for sound propagation in lined flow ducts , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  Hongbin Ju,et al.  Impedance and Its Time-Domain Extensions , 2000 .

[4]  R. Jeremy Astley,et al.  Acoustic propagation on irrotational mean flows using time-domain finite and infinite elements , 2003 .

[5]  W. Schröder,et al.  Acoustic perturbation equations based on flow decomposition via source filtering , 2003 .

[6]  Frank Thiele,et al.  Comparison of Time-Domain Impedance Boundary Conditions by Lined Duct Flows , 2006 .

[7]  Frank Thiele,et al.  Time-domain impedance boundary conditions for surfaces with subsonic mean flows , 2006 .

[8]  Frank Thiele,et al.  Azimuthal Sound Mode Propagation in Axisymmetric Flow Ducts , 2004 .

[9]  Uno Ingard,et al.  Influence of Fluid Motion Past a Plane Boundary on Sound Reflection, Absorption, and Transmission , 1959 .

[10]  W. Habashi,et al.  2N-Storage Low Dissipation and Dispersion Runge-Kutta Schemes for Computational Acoustics , 1998 .

[11]  S. Rienstra Impedance Models in Time Domain including the Extended Helmholtz Resonator Model , 2006 .

[12]  Sjoerd W. Rienstra Impedance models in time domain TU/e contribution to Deliverable 3.5.1 of Task 3.5 Messiaen - Project AST3-CT-2003-502938 , 2005 .

[13]  Frank Thiele,et al.  Sound Generation in the Outlet Section of Gas Turbine Combustion Chambers , 2004 .

[14]  Christopher K. W. Tam,et al.  Wall boundary conditions for high-order finite-difference schemes in computational aeroacoustics , 1994 .

[15]  M.Y. Hussaini,et al.  Low-Dissipation and Low-Dispersion Runge-Kutta Schemes for Computational Acoustics , 1994 .

[16]  Christopher K. W. Tam,et al.  Time-Domain Impedance Boundary Conditions for Computational Aeroacoustics , 1996 .

[17]  F. Hu A Stable, perfectly matched layer for linearized Euler equations in unslit physical variables , 2001 .

[18]  Frank Thiele,et al.  On the azimuthal mode propagation in axisymmetric duct flows. , 2002 .

[19]  Willie R. Watson,et al.  Benchmark Data for Evaluation of Aeroacoustic Propagation Codes With Grazing Flow , 2005 .

[20]  C. Tam,et al.  Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics , 1993 .

[21]  M. K. Myers,et al.  On the acoustic boundary condition in the presence of flow , 1980 .

[22]  SW Sjoerd Rienstra Impedance models in time domain , 2005 .

[23]  Frank Thiele,et al.  Time Domain Impedance Boundary Conditions for a Slip Mean FlowBoundary , 2004 .

[24]  Willie R. Watson,et al.  A Quasi-3-D Theory for Impedance Eduction in Uniform Grazing Flow , 2005 .

[25]  Hongbin Ju,et al.  Broadband Time-Domain Impedance Models , 2001 .

[26]  Frank Thiele,et al.  On the Application of CAA-Methods for the Simulation of Indirect Combustion Noise , 2005 .

[27]  Nicolas Chevaugeon,et al.  Discontinuous Galerkin Implementation Of The Extended Helmholtz Resonator Model In Time Domain , 2006 .

[28]  Yusuf Özyörük,et al.  Time-Domain Numerical Simulation of a Flow-Impedance Tube , 1998 .

[29]  Brian J. Tester,et al.  The propagation and attenuation of sound in lined ducts containing uniform or “plug” flow , 1973 .

[30]  Yusuf Özyörük,et al.  A time-domain implementation of surface acoustic impedance condition with and without flow , 1996 .

[31]  L. Long A nonconservative nonlinear flowfield splitting method for 3-D unsteady fluid dynamics , 2000 .