Analysis of Pilot-Induced-Oscillation and Pilot Vehicle System Stability Using UAS Flight Experiments

This paper reports the results of a Pilot-Induced Oscillation (PIO) and human pilot control characterization study performed using flight data collected with a Remotely Controlled (R/C) unmanned research aircraft. The study was carried out on the longitudinal axis of the aircraft. Several existing Category 1 and Category 2 PIO criteria developed for manned aircraft are first surveyed and their effectiveness for predicting the PIO susceptibility for the R/C unmanned aircraft is evaluated using several flight experiments. It was found that the Bandwidth/Pitch rate overshoot and open loop onset point (OLOP) criteria prediction results matched flight test observations. However, other criteria failed to provide accurate prediction results. To further characterize the human pilot control behavior during these experiments, a quasi-linear pilot model is used. The parameters of the pilot model estimated using data obtained from flight tests are then used to obtain information about the stability of the Pilot Vehicle System (PVS) for Category 1 PIOs occurred during straight and level flights. The batch estimation technique used to estimate the parameters of the quasi-linear pilot model failed to completely capture the compatibility nature of the human pilot. The estimation results however provided valuable insights into the frequency characteristics of the human pilot commands. Additionally, stability analysis of the Category 2 PIOs for elevator actuator rate limiting is carried out using simulations and the results are compared with actual flight results.

[1]  Rogers E. Smith,et al.  An In-Flight Investigation to Develop Control System Design Criteria for Fighter Airplanes. Volume 2. Appendices 1 through 5 , 1970 .

[2]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  AVIATION SAFETY AND PILOT CONTROL: UNDERSTANDING AND PREVENTING UNFAVORABLE PILOT-VEHICLE INTERACTIONS , 1997 .

[3]  Ra Hyde.  Flight Control Systems - practical issues in design and implementation , 2000 .

[4]  Marcello R. Napolitano,et al.  Autonomous Formation Flight: Design and Experiments , 2009 .

[5]  D. Drevdahl,et al.  FM , 2017, The Fairchild Books Dictionary of Fashion.

[6]  Roger W. Pratt.  Flight control systems : practical issues in design and implementation , 2000 .

[7]  Giuseppe Quaranta,et al.  Practices to identify and preclude adverse Aircraft-and-Rotorcraft-Pilot Couplings - A design perspective , 2015 .

[8]  Ralph H Smith,et al.  Handling Quality Requirements for Advanced Aircraft Design: Longitudinal Mode , 1979 .

[9]  Gregory P. Gilbreath.  Prediction of Pilot-Induced Oscillations (PIO) Due to Actuator Rate Limiting Using the Open-Loop Onset Point (OLOP) Criterion , 2001 .

[10]  David G. Mitchell,et al.  A critical examination of PIO prediction criteria , 1998 .

[11]  Warren Williams.  UAV Handling Qualities…..You Must be Joking , 2003 .

[12]  Tanmay Kumar,et al.  Pilot Vehicle System Modeling Using Sub-Scale Flight Experiments , 2014 .

[13]  David L. Kleinman,et al.  A control theoretic approach to manned-vehicle systems analysis , 1971 .

[14]  Marcello R. Napolitano,et al.  Flight-Test Evaluation of Sensor Fusion Algorithms for Attitude Estimation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[15]  David H. Klyde,et al.  PIO analysis with actuator rate limiting , 1996 .

[16]  S. Yoder.  You must be joking! , 1999, The Journal of nursing administration.

[17]  Matthew Rhudy,et al.  Flight Data Analysis of Pilot-Induced-Oscillations of a Remotely Controlled Aircraft , 2013 .

[18]  William S. Levine,et al.  The Control Handbook , 2005 .

[19]  John Gibson,et al.  Evaluation of Alternate Handling Qualities Criteria in Highly Augmented Unstable Aircraft , 1990 .

[20]  Marcello R. Napolitano,et al.  Avionics Design for a Sub-Scale Fault- Tolerant Flight Control Test-Bed , 2012 .

[21]  Alexander H. Levis,et al.  Theoretical problems in man-machine systems and their experimental validation , 1992, Autom..

[22]  David G. Mitchell,et al.  Bandwidth Criteria for Category I and II PIOs , 2001 .

[23]  Ralph Smith,et al.  Predicting and validating fully-developed PIO , 1994 .

[24]  Nancy J. Cooke.  Human Factors of Remotely Operated Vehicles , 2006 .

[25]  David G. Mitchell,et al.  Investigating The Role of Rate Limiting in Pilot-Induced Oscillations , 2003 .

[26]  Mark B. Tischler,et al.  Advances in Aircraft Flight Control , 1996 .

[27]  Ezra S. Krendel,et al.  Mathematical Models of Human Pilot Behavior , 1974 .

[28]  H. Duda.  Prediction of Pilot-in-the-Loop Oscillations Due to Rate Saturation , 1997 .

[29]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  A Review of Quasi-Linear Pilot Models , 1967 .

[30]  Laurence R. Young,et al.  Bang-bang aspects of manual control in high-order systems , 1965 .

[31]  René van Paassen,et al.  Pilot equalization in manual control of aircraft dynamics , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[32]  D. Hanke,et al.  Handling Qualities Analysis on Rate Limiting Elements in Flight Control Systems. , 1994 .

[33]  M. M. Paassen,et al.  Modeling Human Multimodal Perception and Control Using Genetic Maximum Likelihood Estimation , 2009 .

[34]  Francesco Amato,et al.  Analysis of pilot-in-the-loop oscillations due to position and rate saturations , 2000, Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187).

[35]  L. W. Taylor.  A comparison of human response modeling in the time and frequency domains , 1967 .