The redesign and re-evaluation of an internet-based telerehabilitation system for the assessment of dysarthria in adults.

A previous study revealed that reliable assessment of dysarthria was feasible. However, that study also revealed a number of system limitations and suggested that technological enhancements and improvements in study design and clinical assessment protocols were needed before validity and reliability of assessment of dysarthria via telerehabilitation could be confirmed. In the current study, improvements in technology, study design, and clinical assessment protocols were implemented in order to re-examine the validity and reliability of assessing and diagnosing dysarthria via the telerehabilitation medium. The aim of this study was to explore the validity and reliability of assessing dysarthria using both formal standardized and informal assessments via a purpose-built telerehabilitation system. Twenty-four participants with an acquired dysarthria were assessed simultaneously via telerehabilitation and face-to-face (FTF) on a battery of assessments. A custom-built telerehabilitation system enabled real-time telerehabilitation assessment over a 128 Kbps Internet connection. Data analysis included an analysis of strength of agreement between the two methods using percentage agreement and weighted ? statistics. Inter-rater and intrarater reliability were also examined for both the FTF and telerehabilitation-led assessments. Good strength of agreement was found between the FTF and telerehabilitation assessment methods. High intrarater and inter-rater reliability within both the FTF and telerehabilitation assessment methods supported these findings. Participants reported high overall satisfaction in the telerehabilitatin environment. This study describes the improvements made to the telerehabilitation system reported previously and confirms that valid and reliable assessment of dysarthria using both standardized and informal assessments over the Internet is possible using this system.

[1]  P. Enderby,et al.  Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment , 1983 .

[2]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  Clinical Management of Dysarthric Speakers , 1987 .

[3]  Linsey M. Barker,et al.  Telerehabilitation and its effect on story retelling by adults with neurogenic communication disorders , 2004 .

[4]  A. Aronson,et al.  The Dysarthrias: Physiology, Acoustics, Perception, Management , 1985 .

[5]  Annie J. Hill,et al.  An Internet-based telerehabilitation system for the assessment of motor speech disorders: a pilot study. , 2006, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[6]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[7]  Linsey M Barker,et al.  The effect of videoconference-based telerehabilitation on story retelling performance by brain-injured subjects and its implications for remote speech-language therapy. , 2004, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[8]  A. Aronson,et al.  Motor Speech Disorders , 2014 .

[9]  D Theodoros,et al.  Hypernasality in dysarthric speakers following severe closed head injury: a perceptual and instrumental analysis. , 1993, Brain injury.

[10]  M. McHenry Aerodynamic, acoustic, and perceptual measures of nasality following traumatic brain injury. , 1999, Brain injury.

[11]  Deborah Theodoros,et al.  Assessing acquired language disorders in adults via the Internet. , 2008, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[12]  M. Potter,et al.  Resolving the paradoxes , 2008 .

[13]  Bruce E. Murdoch,et al.  Dysarthria : a physiological approach to assessment and treatment , 1998 .

[14]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[15]  A. Aronson,et al.  Telemedicine and the diagnosis of speech and language disorders. , 1997, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[16]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability , 1973 .

[17]  K P Kearns,et al.  Interobserver reliability and perceptual ratings: more than meets the ear. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[18]  C. Sheard,et al.  Reliability and agreement of ratings of ataxic dysarthric speech samples with varying intelligibility. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  A. Feinstein,et al.  High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  A. Feinstein,et al.  High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[21]  J. Kreiman,et al.  Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[22]  B. Murdoch,et al.  Variability in the perceptual and physiological features of dysarthria following severe closed head injury: an examination of five cases. , 1995, Brain injury.

[23]  Annie J. Hill,et al.  The effects of aphasia severity on the ability to assess language disorders via telerehabilitation , 2009 .