Empirical reconstruction and long-duration tracking of the magnetospheric boundary in single- and multi-spacecraft contexts

The magnetospheric boundary is always moving, making it difficult to establish its structure. This paper presents a novel method for tracking the motion of the boundary, based on in-situ observations of the plasma velocity and of one or more additional observables. This method allows the moving boundary to be followed for extended periods of time (up to several hours) and aptly deals with limitations on the time resolution of the data, with measurement errors, and with occasional data gaps; it can exploit data from any number of spacecraft and any type of instrument. At the same time the method is an empirical reconstruction technique that determines the one-dimensional spatial structure of the boundary. The method is illustrated with single- and multi-spacecraft applications using data from Ampte/Irm and Cluster.

[1]  M. W. Dunlop,et al.  The Cluster Magnetic Field Investigation: overview of in-flight performance and initial results , 2001 .

[2]  M. Dunlop,et al.  Cluster PEACE observations of electrons during magnetospheric flux transfer events , 2001 .

[3]  M. W. Dunlop,et al.  Orientation and motion of a discontinuity from Cluster curlometer capability: Minimum variance of current density , 2004 .

[4]  E. W. Hones,et al.  Structure of the low‐latitude boundary layer , 1980 .

[5]  J. Lemaire,et al.  Non-steady-state solar wind-magnetosphere interaction , 1991 .

[6]  M. Dunlop,et al.  Four-spacecraft determination of magnetopause orientation, motion and thickness: comparison with results from single-spacecraft methods , 2004 .

[7]  T. Phan,et al.  Low‐latitude dayside magnetopause and boundary layer for high magnetic shear: 1. Structure and motion , 1996 .

[8]  M. Dunlop,et al.  Cluster observations of surface waves on the dawn flank magnetopause , 2004 .

[9]  B. Sonnerup,et al.  Two‐dimensional coherent structures in the magnetopause: Recovery of static equilibria from single‐spacecraft data , 1999 .

[10]  K. Glassmeier,et al.  Four‐point Cluster application of magnetic field analysis tools: The discontinuity analyzer , 2002 .

[11]  Q. Hu,et al.  Reconstruction of two-dimensional structures in the magnetopause: Method improvements , 2003 .

[12]  Wolfgang Baumjohann,et al.  The magnetopause and boundary layer for small magnetic shear: Convection electric fields and reconnection , 1990 .

[13]  ’. Otto.  Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability at the Magnetotail Boundary: MHD Simulation and Comparison with Geotail Observations , 2022 .

[14]  M. Acuna,et al.  The IRM Fluxgate Magnetometer , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  I. Papamastorakis,et al.  First multispacecraft ion measurements in and near the Earth's magnetosphere with the identical Cluster ion spectrometry (CIS) experiment , 2001 .

[16]  D. Curtis,et al.  The Plasma Instrument for AMPTE IRM , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  M. Dunlop,et al.  Reconstruction of two-dimensional magnetopause structures from Cluster observations: verification of method , 2004 .

[18]  L. J. Cahill,et al.  Magnetopause structure and attitude from Explorer 12 observations. , 1967 .

[19]  H. Hasegawa,et al.  Transport of solar wind into Earth's magnetosphere through rolled-up Kelvin–Helmholtz vortices , 2004, Nature.

[20]  C. Russell,et al.  The thickness of the magnetopause current layer: ISEE 1 and 2 observations , 1982 .

[21]  H. Rème,et al.  Reconstruction of the magnetopause and low-latitude boundary layer topology using Cluster multi-point measurements , 2004 .

[22]  J. De Keyser,et al.  Trying to bring the magnetopause to a standstill , 2002 .