Motor unit estimates obtained using the new “MUESA” method

Motor unit number estimates were obtained from the extensor digitorum brevis and thenar muscles using a new method called MUESA. MUESA is distinguished from other estimation methods in the manner in which it deals with probabilistic motor unit activation, which is more commonly referred to as “alternation.” Because of “alternation,” incremental increases in the observed muscle potentials often cannot be interpreted in terms of the successive activation of single motor units. In the MUESA method, the nerve is subjected to a number of constant‐intensity stimulus trains, and the resultant muscle response sequences are decomposed into their constituent motor unit action potentials. In general, if a stimulus train results in the probabilistic activation of n motor units, we can expect to see up to 2n different potentials, with each potential representing a unique combination of active and/or inactive motor units. If all 2n potentials are indeed observed, the decomposition of the observed potential sequence into its constituent motor unit action potentials is very straightforward. For the majority of the cases in which the number of observed potentials is not an integer power of 2, we have developed a novel decomposition method based on the analysis of the relative firing rates of the motor units. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[1]  J. Mortimer,et al.  The Effect of Stimulus Parameters on the Recruitment Characteristics of Direct Nerve Stimulation , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  A. McComas,et al.  The numbers and relative sizes of motor units estimated by Computer , 1991, Muscle & nerve.

[3]  R C Barr,et al.  Electrophysiological interaction through the interstitial space between adjacent unmyelinated parallel fibers. , 1992, Biophysical journal.

[4]  D. Stashuk,et al.  Physiological properties of single thenar motor units in the F‐response of younger and older adults , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[5]  S D Nandedkar,et al.  Quantitative EMG in inflammatory myopathy , 1990, Muscle & nerve.

[6]  G. Wieneke,et al.  Estimation of the number of motor units based on macro-EMG. , 1988, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[7]  W F Brown,et al.  Multiple point electrical stimulation of ulnar and median nerves. , 1976, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[8]  A. McComas,et al.  Motor unit estimation: Anxieties and achievements , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[9]  W F Brown,et al.  New methods of estimating the number of motor units in a muscle. , 1976, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[10]  J. Albers,et al.  The natural history of a “benign” rib lesion in a patient with a demyelinating polyneuropathy and an unusual variant of poems syndrome , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[11]  W. Brown,et al.  The estimated numbers and relative sizes of thenar motor units as selected by multiple point stimulation in young and older adults , 1993, Muscle & nerve.

[12]  W F Brown,et al.  A method for estimating the number of motor units in thenar muscles and the changes in motor unit count with ageing , 1972, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[13]  L. Edström,et al.  Effect of exercise on the motor unit , 1986, Muscle & nerve.

[14]  A. McComas,et al.  An electrophysiological study of Duchenne dystrophy , 1971, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[15]  Michael Peter Slawnych A new method for estimating the number of motor units in a muscle , 1992 .

[16]  B. Feinstein,et al.  Morphologic studies of motor units in normal human muscles. , 1955, Acta anatomica.

[17]  A. McComas,et al.  Physiological changes in ageing muscles , 1973, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[18]  J F Yang,et al.  Methods for estimating the number of motor units in human muscles , 1990, Annals of neurology.

[19]  P Ashby,et al.  Analysis of motor conduction velocity in the human median nerve by computer simulation of compound muscle action potentials. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  W. Brown,et al.  Neuromuscular transmission in human single motor units. , 1978, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[21]  W. Brown,et al.  Changes in motor unit populations in motor neurone disease. , 1979, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[22]  W. Brown,et al.  Methods for estimating numbers of motor units in biceps‐brachialis muscles and losses of motor units with aging , 1988, Muscle & nerve.

[23]  Bruce C. Wheeler,et al.  A Comparison of Techniques for Classification of Multiple Neural Signals , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  A. Hannam,et al.  The estimation of motor unit twitch tensions in the human masseter muscle by spike‐triggered averaging , 1990, Muscle & nerve.

[25]  M. Bromberg,et al.  Motor unit number estimation, isometric strength, and electromyographic measures in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 1993, Muscle & nerve.

[26]  John A. Hartigan,et al.  Clustering Algorithms , 1975 .

[27]  D W Stashuk,et al.  Motor unit number estimates based on the automated analysis of F‐responses , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[28]  A. Fuglsang-Frederiksen,et al.  Transient decrease in number of motor units after immobilisation in man. , 1978, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.