Diurnal and Semidiurnal Tides in Global Surface Pressure Fields

Global surface pressure data from 1976 to 1997 from over 7500 land stations and the Comprehensive Ocean‐ Atmosphere Data Set have been analyzed using harmonic and zonal harmonic methods. It is found that the diurnal pressure oscillation (S1) is comparable to the semidiurnal pressure oscillation ( S2) in magnitude over much of the globe except for the low-latitude open oceans, where S2 is about twice as strong as S1. Over many land areas, such as the western United States, the Tibetan Plateau, and eastern Africa, S1 is even stronger than S2. This is in contrast to the conventional notion that S2 predominates over much of the globe. The highest amplitudes (;1.3 mb) of S1 are found over northern South America and eastern Africa close to the equator. Here S1 is also strong (;1.1 mb) over high terrain such as the Rockies and the Tibetan Plateau. The largest amplitudes of S2 (;1.0‐1.3 mb) are in the Tropics over South America, the eastern and western Pacific, and the Indian Ocean. Here S1 peaks around 0600‐0800 LST at low latitudes and around 1000‐1200 LST over most of midlatitudes, while S2 peaks around 1000 and 2200 LST over low- and midlatitudes. Here S1 is much stronger over the land than over the ocean and its amplitude distribution is strongly influenced by landmasses, while the land‐sea differences of S2 are small. The spatial variations of S1 correlate significantly with spatial variations in the diurnal temperature range at the surface, suggesting that sensible heating from the ground is a major forcing for S1. Although S2 is much more homogeneous zonally than S1, there are considerable zonal variations in the amplitude of S2, which cannot be explained by zonal variations in ozone and water vapor. Other forcings such as those through clouds’ reflection and absorption of solar radiation and latent heating in convective precipitation are needed to explain the observed regional and zonal variations in S2. The migrating tides and 1 S 1 predominate over other zonal wave components. However, the nonmigrating tides are substantially stronger 2 S 2 than previously reported. The amplitudes of both the migrating and nonmigrating tides decrease rapidly poleward with a slower pace at middle and high latitudes.

[1]  C. Deser,et al.  Diurnal and semidiurnal variations in global surface wind and divergence fields , 1999 .

[2]  K. Trenberth,et al.  Effects of Clouds, Soil Moisture, Precipitation, and Water Vapor on Diurnal Temperature Range , 1999 .

[3]  Kevin E. Trenberth,et al.  Observed and model‐simulated diurnal cycles of precipitation over the contiguous United States , 1999 .

[4]  C. Deser,et al.  Diurnal and Semidiurnal Variations of the Surface Wind Field over the Tropical Pacific Ocean , 1998 .

[5]  R. Lindzen,et al.  Anomalous short wave absorption and atmospheric tides , 1998 .

[6]  Suranjana Saha,et al.  A temporal interpolation method to obtain hourly atmospheric surface pressure tides in Reanalysis 1979-1995 , 1997 .

[7]  K. Trenberth,et al.  Earth's annual global mean energy budget , 1997 .

[8]  G. Stephens,et al.  A new global water vapor dataset , 1996 .

[9]  X. Bian,et al.  Solar semidiurnal tides in the troposphere : Detection by radar profilers , 1996 .

[10]  K. Trenberth,et al.  Conservation of Mass in Three Dimensions in Global Analyses , 1995 .

[11]  K. Trenberth,et al.  The total mass of the atmosphere , 1994 .

[12]  J. Janowiak,et al.  An Examination of the Diurnal Cycle in Oceanic Tropical Rainfall Using Satellite and In Situ Data , 1994 .

[13]  P. Bhartia,et al.  Nimbus-7 Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) Data Products User`s Guide , 1993 .

[14]  S. Saha,et al.  Seasonal Redistribution and Conservation of Atmospheric Mass in a General Circulation Model , 1993 .

[15]  W. J. Steenburgh,et al.  Diurnal Surface-Pressure Variations over the Continental United States and the Influence of Sea Level Reduction , 1991 .

[16]  T. Tsuda,et al.  Diurnal Non-Migrating Tides Excited by a Differential Heating Due to Land-Sea Distribution , 1989 .

[17]  B. Hoskins,et al.  Tidal fluctuations as seen in ECMWF data , 1989 .

[18]  N. S. Cooper Errors in atmospheric tidal determination from surface pressure observations , 1984 .

[19]  G. Groves,et al.  Diurnal, semi-diurnal and terdiurnal Hough components of surface pressure , 1982 .

[20]  K. Hamilton Latent Heat Release as a Possible Forcing Mechanism for Atmospheric Tides , 1981 .

[21]  K. Hamilton Observations of the solar diurnal and semidiurnal surface pressure oscillations in Canada , 1980 .

[22]  K. Hamilton The geographical distribution of the solar semidiurnal surface pressure oscillation , 1980 .

[23]  J. Forbes,et al.  Theoretical studies of atmospheric tides , 1979 .

[24]  R. Lindzen Effect of Daily Variations of Cumulonimbus Activity on the Atmospheric Semidiurnal Tide , 1978 .

[25]  B. Haurwitz,et al.  The diurnal and semidiurnal barometric oscillations global distribution and annual variation , 1973 .

[26]  J. Wallace,et al.  DIURNAL WIND VARIATIONS, SURFACE TO 30 KILOMETERS , 1969 .

[27]  R. Lindzen Thermally driven diurnal tide in the atmosphere , 1967 .

[28]  S. L. Rosenthal,et al.  DIURNAL VARIATION OF SURFACE PRESSURE OVER THE NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN , 1956 .

[29]  B. Haurwitz The geographical distribution of the solar semidiurnal pressure oscillation , 1956 .

[30]  B. Haurwitz The Thermal Influence on the Daily Pressure Wave , 1955 .

[31]  J. Spar Characteristics of the Semi-Diurnal Pressure Wave in the United States , 1952 .