Experimental and experiential approaches to teaching face‐to‐face and computer‐mediated group discussion

The contrast of face‐to‐face (FTF) communication with computer‐mediated communication (CMC), either experimentally or experientially, may be a valuable way for teaching group dynamics and group decision making in educational settings. Our review of the literature and a controlled study illustrate the potential strengths of FTF and CMC formats for group discussion. While students produced significantly more ideas using CMC in our study, they reported that FIT groups were significantly more effective, easier to use, and more satisfying than CMC groups. Given the gap between students' perceptions of CMC effectiveness and an objective measure of effectiveness, suggestions are offered that facilitate the use of CMC in single‐session experimental and experiential exercises, as well as multi‐session group projects.

[1]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[2]  Florence Vidal.  Problem solving and creativity in individuals and groups , 1973 .

[3]  S. R. Hiltz.  The Network Nation , 1978 .

[4]  R. Johansen,et al.  Electronic meetings : technical alternatives and social choices , 1979 .

[5]  B. Fisher.  Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process , 1980 .

[6]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Information systems and organizational change , 1990, CACM.

[7]  Edward Cell.  Learning to learn from experience , 1984 .

[8]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[9]  Arthur B. VanGundy,et al.  Managing Group Creativity: A Modular Approach to Problem Solving , 1984 .

[10]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Affect in Computer-Meditated Communication: An Experiment in Synchronous Terminal-to-Terminal Discussion , 1985, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Mode of communication and the "risky shift" : a controlled experiment with computerized conferencing and anonymity in a large corporation , 1985 .

[12]  Kenneth H. Price,et al.  Problem-Solving Strategies: A Comparison by Problem-Solving Phases , 1985 .

[13]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[14]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[15]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .

[16]  S. Kiesler.  The hidden messages in computer networks , 1986 .

[17]  R. Rice,et al.  Electronic Emotion , 1987 .

[18]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[19]  Michael T. Vanecek,et al.  Computer conferencing and task-oriented decisions: Implications for group decision support , 1988, Inf. Manag..

[20]  Michael Smilowitz,et al.  The Effects of Computer Mediated Communication on an Individual's Judgment: A Study Based on the Methods of Asch's Social Influence Experiment , 1988 .

[21]  Terence R. Lautenbach.  MIS at IBM: Improving the Business Through Better Communications , 1989 .

[22]  Gerald M. Phillips,et al.  Teaching group discussion via computer‐mediated communication , 1989 .

[23]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  User satisfaction with computer-mediated communication systems , 1990 .

[24]  J. Walther,et al.  Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction , 1990 .

[25]  R. M. Hoare,et al.  Computer conferencing: a versatile new undergraduate learning process , 1990, SIGU.

[26]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[27]  Joseph E. McGrath,et al.  Time matters in groups , 1990 .

[28]  Michael T. Vanecek,et al.  Dispersed Group Decision Making Using Nonsimultaneous Computer Conferencing: A Report of Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Lynn E. Davie,et al.  Empowering the learner through computer‐mediated communication , 1991 .

[30]  D. Compton,et al.  Techno-Sense: Making Sense of Computer-Mediated Communication Systems , 1991 .

[31]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Supporting the Search for Competitive Advantage , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Michael Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. , 1991 .

[33]  Mark Mabrito.  Real-Time Computer Network Collaboration , 1992 .

[34]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Communication Concurrency and the New Media , 1993 .

[35]  Leonard J Shedletsky,et al.  Minding Computer-Mediated Communication: CMC as Experiential Learning. , 1993 .

[36]  Bolanle A. Olaniran,et al.  Group Performance in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Communication Media , 1994 .

[37]  Gerald M. Phillips.  Introduction to “the internet’ , 1994 .

[38]  Scott A. Kuehn.  Computer‐mediated communication in instructional settings: A research agenda , 1994 .