Self‐regularized pseudo time‐marching schemes for structural system identification with static measurements

We explore the application of pseudo time marching schemes, involving either deterministic integration or stochastic filtering, to solve the inverse problem of parameter identification of large dimensional structural systems from partial and noisy measurements of strictly static response. Solutions of such non-linear inverse problems could provide useful local stiffness variations and do not have to confront modeling uncertainties in damping, an important, yet inadequately understood, aspect in dynamic system identification problems. The usual method of least-square solution is through a regularized Gauss-Newton method (GNM) whose results are known to be sensitively dependent on the regularization parameter and data noise intensity. Finite time,recursive integration of the pseudo-dynamical GNM (PD-GNM) update equation addresses the major numerical difficulty associated with the near-zero singular values of the linearized operator and gives results that are not sensitive to the time step of integration. Therefore, we also propose a pseudo-dynamic stochastic filtering approach for the same problem using a parsimonious representation of states and specifically solve the linearized filtering equations through a pseudo-dynamic ensemble Kalman filter (PD-EnKF). For multiple sets of measurements involving various load cases, we expedite the speed of thePD-EnKF by proposing an inner iteration within every time step. Results using the pseudo-dynamic strategy obtained through PD-EnKF and recursive integration are compared with those from the conventional GNM, which prove that the PD-EnKF is the best performer showing little sensitivity to process noise covariance and yielding reconstructions with less artifacts even when the ensemble size is small.

[1]  G. Roberts,et al.  Exact simulation of diffusions , 2005, math/0602523.

[2]  J. Beck,et al.  Bayesian Updating of Structural Models and Reliability using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation , 2002 .

[3]  R M Vasu,et al.  A pseudo-dynamic sub-optimal filter for elastography under static loading and measurements , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  J. Bongard,et al.  Co‐evolutionary algorithm for structural damage identification using minimal physical testing , 2007 .

[5]  M. Hoshiya,et al.  Structural Identification by Extended Kalman Filter , 1984 .

[6]  A. Corigliano,et al.  Parameter identification in explicit structural dynamics: performance of the extended Kalman filter , 2004 .

[7]  Keith D. Hjelmstad,et al.  Damage detection and assessment of structures from static response , 1997 .

[8]  Roger B. Sidje,et al.  Expokit: a software package for computing matrix exponentials , 1998, TOMS.

[9]  Debasish Roy,et al.  A pseudo-dynamical systems approach to a class of inverse problems in engineering , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  Gary Smith,et al.  A Critique of Some Ridge Regression Methods , 1980 .

[11]  D. Roy Phase-Space Linearization for Non-Linear Oscillators: Deterministic and Stochastic Systems , 2000 .

[12]  Uri M. Ascher,et al.  On level set regularization for highly ill-posed distributed parameter estimation problems , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[13]  J. Beck,et al.  Updating Models and Their Uncertainties. I: Bayesian Statistical Framework , 1998 .

[14]  Nilanjan Saha,et al.  A Girsanov particle filter in nonlinear engineering dynamics , 2009 .

[15]  Jamshid Ghaboussi,et al.  Genetic algorithm in structural damage detection , 2001 .

[16]  Eleni Chatzi,et al.  The unscented Kalman filter and particle filter methods for nonlinear structural system identification with non‐collocated heterogeneous sensing , 2009 .

[17]  D. Roy,et al.  Higher order weak linearizations of stochastically driven nonlinear oscillators , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[18]  C. S. Manohar,et al.  A sequential importance sampling filter with a new proposal distribution for state and parameter estimation of nonlinear dynamical systems , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  Hui Huang,et al.  On Effective Methods for Implicit Piecewise Smooth Surface Recovery , 2006, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[20]  D. Roy A family of lower‐ and higher‐order transversal linearization techniques in non‐linear stochastic engineering dynamics , 2004 .

[21]  G. Evensen Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi‐geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics , 1994 .

[22]  D. Roy,et al.  A new numeric-analytical principle for nonlinear deterministic and stochastic dynamical systems , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[23]  Bernard Hanzon,et al.  A differential geometric approach to nonlinear filtering: the projection filter , 1998, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[24]  F. Bakhtiari-Nejad,et al.  A structural damage detection method using static noisy data , 2005 .

[25]  Geir Evensen,et al.  The Ensemble Kalman Filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation , 2003 .

[26]  Cleve B. Moler,et al.  Nineteen Dubious Ways to Compute the Exponential of a Matrix, Twenty-Five Years Later , 1978, SIAM Rev..

[27]  Debasish Roy,et al.  Efficient implementations of a pseudodynamical stochastic filtering strategy for static elastography. , 2009, Medical physics.

[28]  Y. Saad,et al.  Krylov Subspace Methods on Supercomputers , 1989 .

[29]  M. Hoshiya,et al.  Kalman Filter—Finite Element Method in Identification , 1993 .

[30]  U. Ascher,et al.  Artificial time integration , 2007 .

[31]  Feng Gao,et al.  A Kalman-filter based time-domain analysis for structural damage diagnosis with noisy signals , 2006 .

[32]  Peter R. Oke,et al.  A deterministic formulation of the ensemble Kalman filter: an alternative to ensemble square root filters , 2008 .

[33]  J. Beck,et al.  Model Selection using Response Measurements: Bayesian Probabilistic Approach , 2004 .

[34]  Simon J. Godsill,et al.  On sequential Monte Carlo sampling methods for Bayesian filtering , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[35]  C. S. Manohar,et al.  Monte Carlo filters for identification of nonlinear structural dynamical systems , 2006 .

[36]  Li Zhou,et al.  An adaptive extended Kalman filter for structural damage identification , 2006 .

[37]  Maria Q. Feng,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring by Recursive Bayesian Filtering , 2009 .