Multisegment Kinematics of the Spinal Column: Soft Tissue Artifacts Assessment.

A major challenge in the assessment of intersegmental spinal column angles during trunk motion is the inherent error in recording the movement of bony anatomical landmarks caused by soft tissue artifacts (STAs). This study aims to perform an uncertainty analysis and estimate the typical errors induced by STA into the intersegmental angles of a multisegment spinal column model during trunk bending in different directions by modeling the relative displacement between skin-mounted markers and actual bony landmarks during trunk bending. First, we modeled the maximum displacement of markers relative to the bony landmarks with a multivariate Gaussian distribution. In order to estimate the distribution parameters, we measured these relative displacements on five subjects at maximum trunk bending posture. Then, in order to model the error depending on trunk bending angle, we assumed that the error grows linearly as a function of the bending angle. Second, we applied our error model to the trunk motion measurement of 11 subjects to estimate the corrected trajectories of the bony landmarks and investigate the errors induced into the intersegmental angles of a multisegment spinal column model. For this purpose, the trunk was modeled as a seven-segment rigid-body system described using 23 reflective markers placed on various bony landmarks of the spinal column. Eleven seated subjects performed trunk bending in five directions and the three-dimensional (3D) intersegmental angles during trunk bending were calculated before and after error correction. While STA minimally affected the intersegmental angles in the sagittal plane (<16%), it considerably corrupted the intersegmental angles in the coronal (error ranged from 59% to 551%) and transverse (up to 161%) planes. Therefore, we recommend using the proposed error suppression technique for STA-induced error compensation as a tool to achieve more accurate spinal column kinematics measurements. Particularly, for intersegmental rotations in the coronal and transverse planes that have small range and are highly sensitive to measurement errors, the proposed technique makes the measurement more appropriate for use in clinical decision-making processes.

[1]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[2]  Joanne M Wagner,et al.  Gait Changes as the Result of Deformity Reconstruction Surgery in a Group of Adults With Lumbar Scoliosis , 2003, Spine.

[3]  Dan Karlsson,et al.  The relative skin movement of the foot: a 2-D roentgen photogrammetry study. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  Hartmut Witte,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  P Lundgren,et al.  Invasive in vivo measurement of rear-, mid- and forefoot motion during walking. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[6]  Kazushi Shimada,et al.  Deviation of skin marker from bone target during movement of the scapula , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[7]  B. Nigg,et al.  Tibiofemoral and tibiocalcaneal motion during walking: external vs. skeletal markers , 1997 .

[8]  K Manal,et al.  Knee moment profiles during walking: errors due to soft tissue movement of the shank and the influence of the reference coordinate system. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[9]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  John H Challis,et al.  An objective evaluation of a segmented foot model. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[11]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Quantification of soft tissue artefact in motion analysis by combining 3D fluoroscopy and stereophotogrammetry: a study on two subjects. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  Michael H Schwartz,et al.  The in vivo three-dimensional motion of the human lumbar spine during gait. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[13]  Alberto Leardini,et al.  Soft tissue artifact compensation in knee kinematics by double anatomical landmark calibration: performance of a novel method during selected motor tasks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  M. Popovic,et al.  Three-dimensional spine kinematics during multidirectional, target-directed trunk movement in sitting. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[15]  Hanna Schell,et al.  On the influence of soft tissue coverage in the determination of bone kinematics using skin markers , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[16]  R. Blickhan,et al.  Three-dimensional relation of skin markers to lumbar vertebrae of healthy subjects in different postures measured by open MRI , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[17]  Lorenzo Chiari,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 4: assessment of anatomical landmark misplacement and its effects on joint kinematics. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[18]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[19]  R. Mann,et al.  A comparison of lower-extremity skeletal kinematics measured using skin- and pin-mounted markers , 1997 .

[20]  G Ferrigno,et al.  Kinematical models to reduce the effect of skin artifacts on marker-based human motion estimation. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Multiple anatomical landmark calibration for optimal bone pose estimation , 1997 .

[22]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[23]  Sara P. Gombatto,et al.  Differences in lumbopelvic motion between people with and people without low back pain during two lower limb movement tests. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[24]  Joyce P Trost,et al.  Measurement and management of errors in quantitative gait data. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[25]  David G Lloyd,et al.  Repeatability of gait data using a functional hip joint centre and a mean helical knee axis. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Rafael Medina-Carnicer,et al.  Assessment of spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis using a video-based motion capture system. , 2012, Manual therapy.

[27]  L. Kuo,et al.  The shift of segmental contribution ratio in patients with herniated disc during cervical lateral bending , 2014, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[28]  Guoan Li,et al.  Segmental lumbar rotation in patients with discogenic low back pain during functional weight-bearing activities. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  M. Popovic,et al.  Sensitivity of intersegmental angles of the spinal column to errors due to marker misplacement. , 2015, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[30]  Milos R Popovic,et al.  A comprehensive three-dimensional dynamic model of the human head and trunk for estimating lumbar and cervical joint torques and forces from upper body kinematics. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[31]  Es Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: Application to the human knee joint. , 1983 .

[32]  Stefania Fatone,et al.  A Kinematic Model to Assess Spinal Motion During Walking , 2006, Spine.

[33]  Silvio Lorenzetti,et al.  Soft Tissue Artefacts of the Human Back: Comparison of the Sagittal Curvature of the Spine Measured Using Skin Markers and an Open Upright MRI , 2014, PloS one.