Spontaneous and UVR-induced multiple metastatic melanomas in Cdk4R24C/R24C/TPras mice

Human melanoma susceptibility is often characterized by germline inactivating CDKN2A (INK4A/ARF) mutations, or mutations that activate CDK4 by preventing its binding to and inhibition by INK4A. We have previously shown that a single neonatal UVR dose delivered to mice that carry melanocyte-specific activation of Hras (TPras) increases melanoma penetrance from 0 to 57%. Here we report that activated Cdk4 cooperates with activated Hras to greatly increase susceptibility to melanoma in mice. While UVR treatment failed to induce melanomas in Cdk4R24C/R24C mice, it greatly increased the penetrance and decreased the age of onset of melanoma development in Cdk4R24C/R24C/TPras animals, compared to TPras alone. This increased penetrance was dependant on the threshold of Cdk4 activation, as Cdk4R24C/+/TPras animals did not show an increase in UVR-induced melanoma penetrance compared to TPras alone. In addition, Cdk4R24C/R24C/TPras mice invariably developed multiple primary lesions, which occurred rarely in TPras mice. These results indicate that germline defects abrogating the pRb pathway may enhance UVR-induced melanoma. TPras and Cdk4R24C/R24C/TPras tumors were comparable histopathologically, but the latter were larger and more aggressive, and cultured cells derived from such melanomas were also larger and had higher levels of nuclear atypia. Moreover, the melanomas in Cdk4R24C/R24C/TPras mice, but not TPras mice, readily metastasized to regional lymph nodes. Thus it appears that in the mouse, Hras activation initiates UVR-induced melanoma development, while the cell cycle defect introduced by mutant Cdk4 contributes to tumor progression, producing larger, more aggressive, metastatic tumors.

[1]  N. Hayward,et al.  Cutaneous melanoma susceptibility and progression genes. , 2005, Cancer letters.

[2]  G. Kay,et al.  Neonatal ultraviolet radiation exposure is critical for malignant melanoma induction in pigmented Tpras transgenic mice. , 2005, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[3]  N. Hayward,et al.  A large Norwegian family with inherited malignant melanoma, multiple atypical nevi, and CDK4 mutation , 2005, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[4]  Mark L. Crowe,et al.  SeqDoC: rapid SNP and mutation detection by direct comparison of DNA sequence chromatograms , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[5]  A. Trumpp,et al.  Metastasizing melanoma formation caused by expression of activated N-RasQ61K on an INK4a-deficient background. , 2005, Cancer research.

[6]  L. Zon,et al.  BRAF Mutations Are Sufficient to Promote Nevi Formation and Cooperate with p53 in the Genesis of Melanoma , 2005, Current Biology.

[7]  R. DePinho,et al.  Impaired processing of DNA photoproducts and ultraviolet hypermutability with loss of p16INK4a or p19ARF. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  D. Sidransky,et al.  Exon 15 BRAF Mutations Are Uncommon in Melanomas Arising in Nonsun-Exposed Sites , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[9]  Ajay N. Jain,et al.  Determinants of BRAF mutations in primary melanomas. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  L. Chin,et al.  Both products of the mouse Ink4a/Arf locus suppress melanoma formation in vivo , 2003, Oncogene.

[11]  Rui Qiao,et al.  BRAF oncogenic mutations correlate with progression rather than initiation of human melanoma. , 2003, Cancer research.

[12]  L. Chin,et al.  Components of the Rb pathway are critical targets of UV mutagenesis in a murine melanoma model , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  N. Hayward,et al.  Pathways to melanoma development: lessons from the mouse. , 2002, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[14]  M. Barbacid,et al.  Invasive melanoma in Cdk4-targeted mice , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  P. Duray,et al.  Neonatal sunburn and melanoma in mice , 2001, Nature.

[16]  A. Berns,et al.  Loss of p16Ink4a confers susceptibility to metastatic melanoma in mice , 2001, Nature.

[17]  D. Carrasco,et al.  Loss of p16Ink4a with retention of p19Arf predisposes mice to tumorigenesis , 2001, Nature.

[18]  L. Chin,et al.  Dual Inactivation of RB and p53 Pathways in RAS-Induced Melanomas , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[19]  R. Nagle,et al.  Induction of melanoma in TPras transgenic mice. , 1999, Carcinogenesis.

[20]  M. Barbacid,et al.  Loss of Cdk4 expression causes insulin-deficient diabetes and Cdk4 activation results in β-islet cell hyperplasia , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[21]  Chi V. Dang,et al.  c-Myc Target Genes Involved in Cell Growth, Apoptosis, and Metabolism , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[22]  Yue Xiong,et al.  ARF Promotes MDM2 Degradation and Stabilizes p53: ARF-INK4a Locus Deletion Impairs Both the Rb and p53 Tumor Suppression Pathways , 1998, Cell.

[23]  Richard A. Ashmun,et al.  Tumor Suppression at the Mouse INK4a Locus Mediated by the Alternative Reading Frame Product p19 ARF , 1997, Cell.

[24]  N. Hayward,et al.  Cytoplasmic accumulation of cdc25B phosphatase in mitosis triggers centrosomal microtubule nucleation in HeLa cells. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[25]  N. Hayward,et al.  Germline mutations in the p16INK4a binding domain of CDK4 in familial melanoma , 1996, Nature Genetics.