Development of seismic fragility surfaces for reinforced concrete buildings by means of nonlinear time‐history analysis

Fragility curves are generally developed using a single parameter to relate the level of shaking to the expected structural damage. The main goal of this work is to use several parameters to characterize the earthquake ground motion. The fragility curves will, therefore, become surfaces when the ground motion is represented by two parameters. To this end, the roles of various strong-motion parameters on the induced damage in the structure are compared through nonlinear time-history numerical calculations. A robust structural model that can be used to perform numerous nonlinear dynamic calculations, with an acceptable cost, is adopted. The developed model is based on the use of structural elements with concentrated nonlinear damage mechanics and plasticity-type behavior. The relations between numerous ground-motion parameters, characterizing different aspects of the shaking, and the computed damage are analyzed and discussed. Natural and synthetic accelerograms were chosen/computed based on a consideration of the magnitude-distance ranges of design earthquakes. A complete methodology for building fragility surfaces based on the damage calculation through nonlinear numerical analysis of multi-degree-of-freedom systems is proposed. The fragility surfaces are built to represent the probability that a given damage level is reached (or exceeded) for any given level of ground motion characterized by the two chosen parameters. The results show that an increase from one to two ground-motion parameters leads to a significant reduction in the scatter in the fragility analysis and allows the uncertainties related to the effect of the second ground-motion parameter to be accounted for within risk assessments.

[1]  H Y Kim,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FRAGILITY CURVES , 2000 .

[2]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  A new analytical procedure for the derivation of displacement-based vulnerability curves for populations of RC structures , 2005 .

[3]  S. Lagomarsino,et al.  Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings , 2006 .

[4]  Giampiero Orsini.  A Model for Buildings' Vulnerability Assessment Using the Parameterless Scale of Seismic Intensity (PSI) , 1999 .

[5]  Mircea Grigoriu,et al.  Seismic fragility analysis: Application to simple linear and nonlinear systems , 2007 .

[6]  Ludovic Margerin,et al.  Nonstationary Stochastic Simulation of Strong Ground Motion Time Histories Including Natural Variability: Application to the K-Net Japanese Database , 2006 .

[7]  Paolo Franchin,et al.  Increased Accuracy of Vector-IM-Based Seismic Risk Assessment? , 2008 .

[8]  J. Baker,et al.  A vector‐valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon , 2005 .

[9]  G. Grünthal.  European macroseismic scale 1998 : EMS-98 , 1998 .

[10]  T. Rossettoa,et al.  Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data , 2003 .

[11]  H. Crowley,et al.  A Comparative Study of European Earthquake Loss Estimation Tools for a Scenario in Istanbul , 2008 .

[12]  John Douglas,et al.  Strong-motion records selection for structural testing , 2006 .

[13]  F. D. Martin,et al.  Numerical modelling of the influence of earthquake strong motion characteristics on the damage level of a reinforced concrete structure , 2007 .

[14]  J. Douglas,et al.  A Survey of Techniques for Predicting Earthquake Ground Motions for Engineering Purposes , 2008 .

[15]  Pierre Mouroux,et al.  Presentation of RISK-UE Project , 2006 .

[16]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  Seismic Fragility of LRC Frames with and without Masonry Infill Walls , 1997 .

[17]  A. Ang,et al.  Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete , 1985 .

[18]  F. Sabetta,et al.  Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.