Manifold anomalies in gene expression in a vineyard isolate of Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed by DNA microarray analysis.

Genome-wide transcriptional profiling has important applications in evolutionary biology for assaying the extent of heterozygosity for alleles showing quantitative variation in gene expression in natural populations. We have used DNA microarray analysis to study the global pattern of transcription in a homothallic strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolated from wine grapes in a Tuscan vineyard, along with the diploid progeny obtained after sporulation. The parental strain shows 2:2 segregation (heterozygosity) for three unlinked loci. One determines resistance to trifluoroleucine; another, resistance to copper sulfate; and the third is associated with a morphological phenotype observed as colonies with a ridged surface resembling a filigree. Global expression analysis of the progeny with the filigreed and smooth colony phenotypes revealed a greater than 2-fold difference in transcription for 378 genes (6% of the genome). A large number of the overexpressed genes function in pathways of amino acid biosynthesis (particularly methionine) and sulfur or nitrogen assimilation, whereas many of the underexpressed genes are amino acid permeases. These wholesale changes in amino acid metabolism segregate as a suite of traits resulting from a single gene or a small number of genes. We conclude that natural vineyard populations of S. cerevisiae can harbor alleles that cause massive alterations in the global patterns of gene expression. Hence, studies of expression variation in natural populations, without accompanying segregation analysis, may give a false picture of the number of segregating genes underlying the variation.

[1]  A. Mitchell,et al.  Proteolytic activation of Rim1p, a positive regulator of yeast sporulation and invasive growth. , 1997, Genetics.

[2]  P. Blaiseau,et al.  Met30p, a yeast transcriptional inhibitor that responds to S-adenosylmethionine, is an essential protein with WD40 repeats , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[3]  P. Brown,et al.  DNA arrays for analysis of gene expression. , 1999, Methods in enzymology.

[4]  T. Hughes,et al.  Signaling and circuitry of multiple MAPK pathways revealed by a matrix of global gene expression profiles. , 2000, Science.

[5]  E. Lander,et al.  Effectors of a developmental mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade revealed by expression signatures of signaling mutants. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  M. Polsinelli,et al.  On the origins of wine yeast. , 1999, Research in microbiology.

[7]  M. Tyers,et al.  SCFMet30‐mediated control of the transcriptional activator Met4 is required for the G1–S transition , 2000 .

[8]  Genetic and biochemical characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants resistant to trifluoroleucine. , 1997, Research in microbiology.

[9]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Rapamycin-modulated transcription defines the subset of nutrient-sensitive signaling pathways directly controlled by the Tor proteins. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  M. Tyers,et al.  Feedback‐regulated degradation of the transcriptional activator Met4 is triggered by the SCFMet30 complex , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[11]  L. Wodicka,et al.  Genome-wide expression monitoring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1997, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  D. Lew Cell-cycle checkpoints that ensure coordination between nuclear and cytoplasmic events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2000, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[13]  J. Heitman,et al.  Characterization of alcohol-induced filamentous growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[14]  R. Mortimer,et al.  Genome renewal: A new phenomenon revealed from a genetic study of 43 strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae derived from natural fermentation of grape musts , 1994, Yeast.

[15]  M. Runswick,et al.  Identification of the Yeast Mitochondrial Transporter for Oxaloacetate and Sulfate* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  G. Fink,et al.  Symmetric cell division in pseudohyphae of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1994, Molecular biology of the cell.

[17]  P. Brown,et al.  Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. , 1997, Science.

[18]  A. Mitchell,et al.  Identification of functionally related genes that stimulate early meiotic gene expression in yeast. , 1993, Genetics.

[19]  G. Fink,et al.  Induction of pseudohyphal growth by overexpression of PHD1, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene related to transcriptional regulators of fungal development , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[20]  B. Haarer,et al.  Identification of MYO4, a second class V myosin gene in yeast. , 1994, Journal of cell science.

[21]  S. Reed,et al.  Cdc34 and the F-box protein Met30 are required for degradation of the Cdk-inhibitory kinase Swe1. , 1998, Genes & development.

[22]  J. Heitman,et al.  The MEP2 ammonium permease regulates pseudohyphal differentiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[23]  L. Samson,et al.  Global response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to an alkylating agent. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Functional Discovery via a Compendium of Expression Profiles , 2000, Cell.

[25]  D. Botstein,et al.  Systematic changes in gene expression patterns following adaptive evolution in yeast. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.