Benchmark Studies For Structural Health Monitoring Using Analytical And Experimental Models

The latest bridge inventory report for the United States indicates that 25% of the highway bridges are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete. With such a large number of bridges in this condition, safety and serviceability concerns become increasingly relevant along with the associated increase in user costs and delays. Biennial inspections have proven subjective and need to be coupled with standardized non-destructive testing methods to accurately assess a bridge’s condition for decision making purposes. Structural health monitoring is typically used to track and evaluate performance, symptoms of operational incidents, anomalies due to deterioration and damage during regular operation as well as after an extreme event. Dynamic testing and analysis are concepts widely used for health monitoring of existing structures. Successful health monitoring applications on real structures can be achieved by integrating experimental, analytical and information technologies on real life, operating structures. Real-life investigations must be backed up by laboratory benchmark studies. In addition, laboratory benchmark studies are critical for validating theory, concepts, and new technologies as well as creating a collaborative environment between different researchers. To implement structural health monitoring methods and technologies, a physical bridge model was developed in the UCF structures laboratory as part of this thesis research. In this study, the development and testing of the bridge model are discussed after a literature review of physical models. Different aspects of model development, with respect to the physical bridge model are outlined in terms of design considerations, instrumentation, finite element modeling, and simulating damage scenarios. Examples of promising damage detection methods were iii evaluated for common damage scenarios simulated on the numerical and physical models. These promising damage indices were applied and directly compared for the same experimental and numerical tests. To assess the simulated damage, indices such as modal flexibility and curvature were applied using mechanics and structural dynamics theory. Damage indices based on modal flexibility were observed to be promising as one of the primary indicators of damage that can be monitored over the service life of a structure. Finally, this thesis study will serve an international effort that has been initiated to explore bridge health monitoring methodologies under the auspices of International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety (IABMAS). The data generated in this thesis research will be made available to researchers as well as practitioners in the broad field of structural health monitoring through several national and international societies, associations and committees such as American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Dynamics Committee, and the newly formed ASCE Structural Health Monitoring and Control Committee.

[1]  G. De Roeck,et al.  Z24 bridge damage detection tests , 1999 .

[2]  Dionisio Bernal,et al.  Flexibility-Based Approach for Damage Characterization: Benchmark Application , 2004 .

[3]  Glenn Washer,et al.  Reliability of visual inspection for highway bridges , 2001 .

[4]  F. N. Catbas,et al.  INTEGRATED FIELD , THEORETICAL AND LABORATORY RESEARCH FOR SOLVING LARGE SYSTEMS IDENTIFICATION PROBLEMS , 2000 .

[5]  Osamu Yoshida,et al.  Seismic Control of a Nonlinear Benchmark Building using Smart Dampers , 2004 .

[6]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Phase II Benchmark Control Problem for Seismic Response of Cable-Stayed Bridges , 2003 .

[7]  Ahmet E. Aktan,et al.  Damage Detection and Condition Assessment of Seymour Bridge , 1998 .

[8]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Benchmark Control Problems for Seismically Excited Nonlinear Buildings , 2004 .

[9]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  A review of structural health monitoring literature 1996-2001 , 2002 .

[10]  A. Emin Aktan,et al.  Structural identification of phenomenological physical models with controlled mechanisms of uncertainty , 2001, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[11]  Alison B. Flatau,et al.  Review Paper: Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructure , 2003 .

[12]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  PHASE I BENCHMARK CONTROL PROBLEM FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES , 2003 .

[13]  T. Igusa,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering by Anil K. Chopra , 1996 .

[14]  F. C. Hadipriono,et al.  ANALYSIS OF RECENT BRIDGE FAILURES IN THE UNITED STATES , 2003 .

[15]  A. Emin Aktan,et al.  Exploration of structural identification tools and barriers on a laboratory model , 2004, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[16]  A. Emin Aktan,et al.  Use of Modal Flexibility for Damage Detection and Condition Assessment: Case Studies and Demonstrations on Large Structures , 2006 .

[17]  Campbell R. Middleton,et al.  Reliability of visual inspection of highway bridges , 2002 .

[18]  A. Emin Aktan,et al.  CONDITION AND DAMAGE ASSESSMENT: ISSUES AND SOME PROMISING INDICES , 2002 .

[19]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review , 1996 .

[20]  A. Emin Aktan,et al.  Parameter Estimation for Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Modal Analysis of Large Structures , 2004 .

[21]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  STRUCTURAL DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION USING MODAL DATA. II: TEST VERIFICATION , 2002 .

[22]  David A. Nix,et al.  Vibration–based structural damage identification , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[23]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL BENCHMARK PROBLEM IN STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING , 2001 .