Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional space

The present experiment examined the shape of the attentional gradient in three-dimensional space. Subjects performed a response-compatibility task in which they were instructed to respond to a centrally located target and ignore flanking distractors. The irrelevant distractors were presented at combinations of seven different depths, three different horizontal separations, and three different vertical separations relative to the target. Depth was varied in a stereoscopic display viewed through polarized glasses. Overall, the size of the response-compatibility effect decreased with increased separation in all three dimensions. Interestingly, the response-compatibility effect was larger for horizontal separations than for vertical separations and was larger for crossed disparities than for uncrossed disparities. The results suggest an elliptical focus of attention, with steeper gradients in the vertical dimensions than in the horizontal dimensions. In addition, the results suggest, along the vertical dimension, a steeper gradient for objects located beyond the focus of attention relative to that for objects located between the observer and the focus of attention.

[1]  G Westheimer,et al.  The sensory stimulus for disjunctive eye movements. , 1969, Vision research.

[2]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[3]  G WESTHEIMER,et al.  Independence of conjugate and disjunctive eye movements , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[6]  L Harms,et al.  Color segregation and selective attention in a nonsearch task , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  Howard S. Bashinski,et al.  Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  H. Hughes,et al.  Spatial maps of directed visual attention. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  G. Shulman,et al.  Moving attention through visual space. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. , 1989 .

[11]  A. Kramer,et al.  Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Movements of attention in the three spatial dimensions and the meaning of “neutral” cues , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Variations in size of the visual field in which targets are presented: An attentional range effect , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  S B Steinman,et al.  Serial and Parallel Search in Pattern Vision? , 1987, Perception.

[16]  J. Jonides.  Further toward a model of the Mind’s eye’s movement , 1983 .

[17]  H. D. Watson.  The effects of objective and perceived size properties on visual form matching. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  J. R. Pomerantz,et al.  Grouping by proximity: Selective attention measures , 1975 .

[19]  D. LaBerge.  Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  G J Andersen,et al.  Focused attention in three-dimensional space , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Spatial selectivity in visual search , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  D. Broadbent.  Task combination and selective intake of information. , 1982, Acta psychologica.

[24]  B. Julesz,et al.  Binocular disparity modulation sensitivity to disparities offset from the plane of fixation , 1984, Vision Research.

[25]  G. Humphreys.  Flexibility of attention between stimulus dimensions , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.