Retinal blur and the perception of egocentric distance.

A central function of vision is determining the layout and size of objects in the visual field, both of which require knowledge of egocentric distance (the distance of an object from the observer). A wide range of visual cues can reliably signal relative depth relations among objects, but retinal signals directly specifying distance to an object are limited. A potential source of distance information is the pattern of blurring on the retina, since nearer fixation generally produces larger gradients of blur on the extra-foveal retina. While prior studies implicated blur as only a qualitative cue for relative depth ordering, we find that retinal blur gradients can act as a quantitative cue to distance. Surfaces depicted with blur gradients were judged as significantly closer than those without, with the size of the effect modulated by the degree of blur, as well as the availability of other extra-retinal cues to distance. Blur gradients produced substantial changes in perceived distance regardless of relative depth relations of the surfaces indicated by other cues, suggesting that it operates as a robust cue to distance, consistent with the empirical relationship between blur and fixation distance.

[1]  John M Foley,et al.  Effect of Distance Information and Range on Two Indices of Visually Perceived Distance , 1977, Perception.

[2]  K J Ciuffreda,et al.  Accommodation and Apparent Distance , 1988, Perception.

[3]  J. Gibson.  The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[4]  G. Mather,et al.  Blur Discrimination and its Relation to Blur-Mediated Depth Perception , 2002, Perception.

[5]  D. McCready,et al.  Size-distance perception and accommodation-convergence micropsia--a critique. , 1965, Vision research.

[6]  James P. C. Southall,et al.  Blur circles on the retina. , 1924 .

[7]  Michael A. Webster,et al.  Neural adjustments to image blur , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Goulding,et al.  Erratum: Lbx1 and Tlx3 are opposing switches in determining GABAergic versus glutamatergic transmitter phenotypes , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Visual Perception of Location and Distance , 1996 .

[10]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon , 2001, Nature.

[11]  M F Bradshaw,et al.  Disparity Scaling and the Perception of Frontoparallel Surfaces , 1995, Perception.

[12]  Alfred H. Holway,et al.  Determinants of Apparent Visual Size with Distance Variant , 1941 .

[13]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[14]  James M. Hillis,et al.  Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[15]  George Mather,et al.  Image blur as a pictorial depth cue , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  J Predebon,et al.  The Influence of Object Familiarity on Magnitude Estimates of Apparent Size , 1992, Perception.

[17]  M F Bradshaw,et al.  Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis , 1993, Nature.

[18]  W C GOGEL,et al.  The visual perception of size and distance. , 1962, [Report]. Civil Aeromedical Research Institute.

[19]  J. E. W. Mayhew,et al.  A computational model of binocular depth perception , 1982, Nature.

[20]  Hans Wallach,et al.  Familiar size and linear perspective as distance cues in stereoscopic depth constancy , 1980 .

[21]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[22]  M. Ernst,et al.  Focus cues affect perceived depth. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[23]  Erik Blaser.  The hidden scale of natural forms: A new cue to depth? , 2010 .

[24]  Y Trotter,et al.  Distance Perception within near Visual Space , 2001, Perception.

[25]  B. Gillam,et al.  The induced effect, vertical disparity, and stereoscopic theory , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  J Predebon,et al.  The Familiar-Size Cue to Distance and Stereoscopic Depth Perception , 1993, Perception.

[27]  R Sekuler,et al.  Blur and Contrast as Pictorial Depth Cues , 1997, Perception.

[28]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Some Recent Studies on the Extraretinal Contribution to Distance Perception , 1999, Perception.

[29]  L Maler,et al.  Blurring of the senses: common cues for distance perception in diverse sensory systems , 2002, Neuroscience.

[30]  Robert A. Jacobs,et al.  Depth-dependent blur adaptation , 2004, Vision Research.

[31]  Robert S. Allison,et al.  Detection of the depth order of defocused images , 2005, Vision Research.

[32]  Bin Wang,et al.  Equiblur zones at the fovea and near retinal periphery , 2006, Vision Research.

[33]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. , 2003 .

[34]  E. Brenner,et al.  Judging distance from ocular convergence , 1998, Vision Research.

[35]  H. Helmholtz.  Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1963 .

[36]  W C Gogel,et al.  The Effect of Object Familiarity on the Perception of Size and Distance , 1969, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  C. A. Burbeck,et al.  Occlusion edge blur: a cue to relative visual depth. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[38]  W. Epstein,et al.  The current status of the size-distance hypotheses. , 1961, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  John M. Foley,et al.  Visually directed pointing as a function of target distance, direction, and available cues , 1972 .

[40]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  The size-distance paradox is a cognitive phenomenon , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  An indirect method of measuring perceived distance from familiar size , 1976 .

[42]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions , 1997 .

[43]  Nobuyuki Hiruma,et al.  Characteristics of accommodation toward apparent depth , 1999, Vision Research.

[44]  Hiroshi Ono,et al.  Oculomotor adjustments and size-distance perception , 1974 .

[45]  J. T. Enright.  Perspective vergence: Oculomotor responses to line drawings , 1987, Vision Research.

[46]  J. M. Foley.  Binocular distance perception. , 1980, Psychological review.

[47]  Bin Wang,et al.  Depth-of-focus of the human eye in the near retinal periphery , 2003, Vision Research.

[48]  Alexander Kr.  On the nature of accommodative micropsia. , 1975 .