The publication trajectory of graduate students, post-doctoral fellows, and new professors in psychology

Each year as the number of graduate students in psychology increases, there is also increased competition for academic positions. The general consensus is that there is higher pressure for students to publish prolifically, yet there is little information as to what this exactly means. The main aim of the present study was to examine the average publication trajectory of a psychology student advancing to a post-doctoral fellowship to a faculty position. We obtained curricula vitae from graduate students, post-doctoral fellows, and junior faculty members from 2010 to 2015 in addition to self-reports from the graduate students. The number of publications substantially increased with each step of progression: graduate students published on average 2.89 (self-report) to 3.08 (CV report) papers, post-doctoral fellows on average published 8.06 papers, and junior professors on average had 14.30 publications before they were hired. The same pattern was observed even when restricting the number of publications to only those that were first-authored. However, a slightly different pattern emerged when comparing a scientometric index (zp-index) that takes into account both the quantity and quality of publications.

[1]  Michael Roach,et al.  Science PhD Career Preferences: Levels, Changes, and Advisor Encouragement , 2012, PloS one.

[2]  Daniel B. Larremore,et al.  Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks , 2015, Science Advances.

[3]  P. Hegarty,et al.  The Consequences of Predicting Scientific Impact in Psychology Using Journal Impact Factors , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[4]  J. Samulski,et al.  Who ’ s Afraid of Peer Review ? , 2009 .

[5]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The measurement of Italian universities’ research productivity by a non parametric-bibliometric methodology , 2008, Scientometrics.

[6]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Highly cited non-journal publications in political science, economics and psychology: a first exploration , 2010, Scientometrics.

[7]  David van Dijk,et al.  Publication metrics and success on the academic job market , 2014, Current Biology.

[8]  Robert A Emmons Abstract versus concrete goals: personal striving level, physical illness, and psychological well-being. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[10]  Ravi Iyer,et al.  The Relationship between School/Department Rankings, Student Achievements, and Student Experiences: The Case of Psychology , 2015 .

[11]  R. Carleton,et al.  Assessing the Publication Productivity of Clinical Psychology Professors in Canadian Psychological Association-Accredited Canadian Psychology Departments , 2012 .

[12]  I. W. Molenaar,et al.  Statistics In The Social And Behavioral Sciences , 1985 .

[13]  R. Dellavalle,et al.  The write position , 2007, EMBO reports.

[14]  David Cyranoski,et al.  Education: The PhD factory , 2011, Nature.

[15]  Andrew J. Elliot,et al.  Self-evaluation bias and academic performance: Some ways and some reasons why. , 2003 .

[16]  G. Buela-Casal Scientific Journal Impact Indexes and Indicators for Measuring Researchers' Performance Índices de impacto de las revistas científicas e indicadores para medir el rendimiento de los investigadores , 2010 .

[17]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Can the journal impact factor be used as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers? A large-scale empirical study based on ResearcherID data , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[18]  Wendy M. Williams,et al.  Women have substantial advantage in STEM faculty hiring, except when competing against more-accomplished men , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[19]  P. Jacsó As we may search : Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases , 2005 .

[20]  Péter Jacsó,et al.  The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Google Scholar , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[21]  Christopher Zou,et al.  Quantifying the scientific output of new researchers using the zp-index , 2015, Scientometrics.

[22]  Luís Fernández-Ríos,et al.  The “impact factor style of thinking”: A new theoretical framework , 2014 .

[23]  Rachel S. Franklin,et al.  Working in a Landscape of Recession and Expansion: Academic Jobs in Geography in the United States, 1990–2011 , 2013 .