Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental evidence for patch-specific resistance in the Natterjack toad (Bufo calamita)

Despite the importance assigned to inter-patch movements in fragmented systems, the structure of landscape between suitable habitat patches, the matrix, is often considered as to be of minor interest, or totally ignored. Consequently, models predicting metapopulation dynamics typically assume that dispersal and movement abilities are independent of the composition of the matrix. The predictions of such models should be invalided if that crucial assumption is unverified. In order to test the hypothesis of a patch-specific resistance, we led an experimental study to assess the matrix effects on the movement ability of juvenile Natterjack toads (Bufo calamita). The movement behaviour of first year toadlets, the dispersal stage in this species, was investigated in an arena experiment. Toadlet mobility was assessed in five landscape components that were mimicked in the lab: sandy soil, road, forest, agricultural field, and pasture. We analysed several movement components including move length, speed, efficiency and turning angle distribution. Our results showed that movement ability was strongly affected by the land cover, even if body size modulated the behavioural responses of toadlets. Performances were the best in the arenas mimicking sand and roads, and the worst in the forest arena, toadlet moves being three to five times less effective in the latter. The mobility was intermediate in the two other arenas. We propose here a new method to quantify functional connectivity, based on quantitative estimates of relative values for resistance of landscape components. This method offers a reliable alternative for resistance value estimates to subjective ‘expert advice’ or inference from genetic population structure.

[1]  Anthony W. King,et al.  Dispersal success on spatially structured landscapes: when do spatial pattern and dispersal behavior really matter? , 2002 .

[2]  I. Hanski.  Metapopulation dynamics , 1998, Nature.

[3]  Nicolas Schtickzelle,et al.  Metapopulation viability analysis of the bog fritillary butterfly using RAMAS/GIS , 2004 .

[4]  Nick M. Haddad,et al.  CORRIDOR AND DISTANCE EFFECTS ON INTERPATCH MOVEMENTS: A LANDSCAPE EXPERIMENT WITH BUTTERFLIES , 1999 .

[5]  E. Matthysen,et al.  Incorporating landscape elements into a connectivity measure: a case study for the Speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.) , 2003, Landscape Ecology.

[6]  B. J. Goodwin,et al.  Effect of landscape structure on the movement behaviour of a specialized goldenrod beetle, Trirhabda borealis , 2002 .

[7]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and extinction thresholds on fractal landscapes , 1999 .

[8]  M. Baguette,et al.  The genetic structure of endangered populations in the Cranberry Fritillary, Boloria aquilonaris (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae): RAPDs vs allozymes , 2002, Heredity.

[9]  Nicholas I. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Circular Data , 1993 .

[10]  L. Keller,et al.  Inbreeding effects in wild populations. , 2002 .

[11]  Andrew F. Bennett,et al.  Habitat corridors and the conservation of small mammals in a fragmented forest environment , 1990, Landscape Ecology.

[12]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Effects of body size and parasite infection on the locomotory performance of juvenile toads, Bufo bufo , 1993 .

[13]  Françoise Burel,et al.  Movements of Abax parallelepipedus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in woody habitats of a hedgerow network landscape: a radio-tracing study , 1997 .

[14]  Andy South,et al.  Dispersal in Spatially Explicit Population Models , 1999 .

[15]  Dennis D. Murphy,et al.  Distribution of the Bay Checkerspot Butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis: Evidence for a Metapopulation Model , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[16]  T. Beebee,et al.  A microsatellite analysis of natterjack toad, Bufo calamita, metapopulations , 2000 .

[17]  D. Driscoll.  Mobility and metapopulation structure of Geocrinia alba and Geocrinia vitellina, two endangered frog species from southwestern Australia , 1997 .

[18]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Scaling of ‘landscapes’ in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle's perspective , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[19]  Erik Matthysen,et al.  The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model , 2003 .

[20]  T. Stephan,et al.  Modelling the extinction risk of isolated populations of natterjack toad Bufo calamita , 2001 .

[21]  Nicolas Schtickzelle,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: comparison of demographic parameters and dispersal between a continuous and a highly fragmented landscape , 2003, Landscape Ecology.

[22]  Robert Lee Schooley,et al.  Patchy Landscapes and Animal Movements: Do Beetles Percolate? , 1997 .

[23]  I. Hanski.  Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes , 1999 .

[24]  N. Schumaker,et al.  Assessing the potential impacts of alternative landscape designs on amphibian population dynamics , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[25]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  ESTIMATING THE PARAMETERS OF SURVIVAL AND MIGRATION OF INDIVIDUALS IN METAPOPULATIONS , 2000 .

[26]  C. Thomas,et al.  Spatial dynamics of a patchily distributed butterfly species , 1992 .

[27]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology , 1997 .

[28]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  EFFECT OF HABITAT FRAGMENTATION ON THE EXTINCTION THRESHOLD: A SYNTHESIS* , 2002 .

[29]  N. Yoccoz,et al.  Studying Transfer Processes in Metapopulations: Emigration, Migration, and Colonization , 1997 .

[30]  Cinda Davis,et al.  MOVEMENT RESPONSES TO PATCH STRUCTURE IN EXPERIMENTAL FRACTAL LANDSCAPES , 1999 .

[31]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution , 1997 .

[32]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Effect of road traffic on amphibian density , 1995 .

[33]  R L Marsh,et al.  Jumping ability of anuran amphibians. , 1994, Advances in veterinary science and comparative medicine.

[34]  M. Tejedo.  Effects of body size and timing of reproduction on reproductive success in female natterjack toads (Bufo calamita) , 1992 .

[35]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Animal movement in heterogeneous landscapes : an experiment with Eleodes beetles in shortgrass prairie , 1992 .

[36]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[37]  U. Sinsch.  Postmetamorphic dispersal and recruitment of first breeders in a Bufo calamita metapopulation , 1997, Oecologia.

[38]  Dennis D. Murphy,et al.  Conservation Strategy: The Effects of Fragmentation on Extinction , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[39]  D. C. Patrick,et al.  Field test for environmental correlates of dispersal in hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus , 2001 .

[40]  Ian D. Jonsen,et al.  Fine-scale movement behaviors of calopterygid damselflies are influenced by landscape structure: an experimental manipulation , 2000 .

[41]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Assessing the Data Requirements of Spatially Explicit Dispersal Models , 1997 .

[42]  M. Baguette,et al.  Local populations and metapopulations are both natural and operational categories , 2003 .

[43]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  The Effects of Edge Permeability and Habitat Geometry on Emigration from Patches of Habitat , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[44]  M. Baguette,et al.  Demographic processes in a small, isolated population of natterjack toads (Bufo calamita) in southern Belgium , 2003 .

[45]  R. Griffiths.  Temporary ponds as amphibian habitats , 1997 .

[46]  S. Petit,et al.  Population spatial structure and migration of three butterfly species within the same habitat network: consequences for conservation. , 2000 .

[47]  T. Ricketts.  The Matrix Matters: Effective Isolation in Fragmented Landscapes , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[48]  M. Tejedo.  Large male mating advantage in natterjack toads, Bufo calamita: sexual selection or energetic constraints? , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  C. Beck,et al.  Effects of age and size at metamorphosis on performance and metabolic rates of Southern Toad, Bufo terrestris, metamorphs , 2000 .

[50]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Habitat Patch Connectivity and Population Survival , 1985 .

[51]  L. Brooker,et al.  Animal Dispersal in Fragmented Habitat: Measuring Habitat Connectivity, Corridor Use, and Dispersal Mortality , 1999 .

[52]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Covariation of Morphology and Jumping Performance in Newly Metamorphosed Water Frogs: Effects of Larval Growth History , 2000, Copeia.

[53]  T. Beebee,et al.  Genetic substructuring as a result of barriers to gene flow in urban Rana temporaria (common frog) populations: implications for biodiversity conservation , 1997, Heredity.

[54]  T. C. Beebee.  A review of scientific information pertaining to the natterjack toad Bufo calamita throughout its geographical range , 1979 .

[55]  P. Turchin.  Quantitative analysis of movement : measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants , 1998 .

[56]  M. Massot,et al.  Maternal Parasite Load Increases Sprint Speed and Philopatry in Female Offspring of the Common Lizard , 1994, The American Naturalist.