Writing in the anthropocene: idle chatter or ecoprophetic witness?

Two words haunt any ecologically attuned consideration of the historical hour in which our increasingly globalised world currently finds itself: one, which heads this special issue of the Ecological Humanities, is ‘anthropocene’; the other, lurking as a grim potential, or even an unfolding reality, within the notion of the anthropocene is ‘ecocide’. The former term implicates us all in a call to responsibility: the future of Earth, understood as a diverse collectivity of more-than-human life and the conditions in which such life either thrives or fails, we are told, now lies in our human, all-too-human hands. Awesome, and certainly burdensome, though the responsibility connoted by this word may be, the latter term is more troubling, implicating us, and some considerably more than others, as perpetrators of a crime against our Earth others that is at once historically unprecedented and morally unforgivable, and by which we too are now imperiled. Thinking these two terms in conjunction, we are confronted by the question of whether the anthropocene will be the era in which the ecocidal violence that modern industrial civilization has thus far unleashed upon the Earth will culminate in the utter destruction of humanity’s planetary birthplace, the oikos that remains still our only home and the home of the myriad other beings who are our kin; or whether we will manage to pull back from the brink, vouchsafing our Earth others the possibility not merely of a continued existence after their own kind, but perhaps even of a renewed and greater flourishing, as those of our kind, who had come to consider themselves apart from and above the rest, learn to live in a more just and compassionate pattern of relationship with the more-than-human lives in whose midst, and through whose grace, we ourselves exist.

[1]  Brandon R. Schrand Works Cited , 1991, Bach's Cycle, Mozart's Arrow.

[2]  J. Derrida,et al.  The Animal That Therefore I Am , 2019, In the Tree Where the Double Sex Sleeps.

[3]  George Steiner,et al.  Language and Silence: Essays on Language, Literature, and the Inhuman , 1967 .

[4]  Luft und Raumfahrttechnik NASA Earth Observatory , 2010 .

[5]  C. Gerhardt The Ethics of Animals in Adorno and Kafka , 2006 .

[6]  K. Gibson,et al.  A postcapitalist politics of dwelling : ecological humanities and community economies in conversation , 2009 .

[7]  C. Rigby Earth, World, Text: On the (Im)possibility of Ecopoiesis , 2004 .

[8]  Elizabeth Mcmahon Australian Humanities Review , 1999 .

[9]  Helena Feder,et al.  Environmental Culture: the Ecological Crisis of Reason , 2004 .

[10]  J. Israel,et al.  On the prophets , 2007 .

[11]  R. Livingstone,et al.  Problems of Moral Philosophy , 1999 .

[12]  Laurie Kutchins A Wild Sound, Wild Wound: Some Thoughts on Judith Wright , 2007 .

[13]  B. Bennett An Australian Compass: Essays on Place and Direction in Australian Literature , 1991 .

[14]  D. Rose On history, trees, and ethical proximity , 2008 .

[15]  S. Benso The Face of Things: A Different Side of Ethics , 2000 .

[16]  R. Savage Adorno’s Family and Other Animals , 2004 .

[17]  V. Plumwood Nature as Agency and the Prospects for a Progressive Naturalism , 2001 .

[18]  E. Martin Re-reading Adorno: The 'after-Auschwitz' Aporia , 2006 .

[19]  Sakae Kubo The New Revised Standard Version , 1991 .

[20]  Val Plumwood,et al.  Feminism and the Mastery of Nature , 2019, Ideals and Ideologies.