Dynamic capabilities, deliberate learning and environmental dynamism: a simulation model

This article presents a simulation model of the development of knowledge, operating routines and dynamic capability in organizations at varying levels of environmental dynamism. We draw on system dynamics modeling to explore trade-offs and ambiguities in the decision to invest in deliberate learning processes to enhance the development of dynamic capabilities. The model incorporates mindfulness and tool utility (positive) effects as well as experience and inertia (negative) effects on dynamic capability. The simulation experiments conducted with the model suggest that the impact of deliberate learning on dynamic capability is non-linear, complex, and in some instances counter-intuitive. This is evident from the thresholds (tipping points) that arise from the differential effects of articulated knowledge, codified knowledge and operating routines on dynamic capability at different levels of environmental dynamism. Copyright 2010 The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

[1]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[2]  D. Teece.  The Competitive challenge : strategies for industrial innovation and renewal : the Transamerica lectures in corporate strategy, School of Business, University of California, Berkely , 1987 .

[3]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[4]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[5]  Christoph Zott,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND THE EMERGENCE OF INTRAINDUSTRY DIFFERENTIAL FIRM PERFORMANCE: INSIGHTS FROM A SIMULATION STUDY , 2003 .

[6]  R G Coyle,et al.  System Dynamics Modelling: A Practical Approach , 1996 .

[7]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Crossing an Apparent Chasm: Bridging Mindful and Less-Mindful Perspectives on Organizational Learning , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[8]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Unanimity Rule and Organizational Decision Making: A Simulation Model , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[9]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[10]  D. Teece,et al.  Cross-border Market Co-creation, Dynamic Capabilities and the Entrepreneurial Theory of the Multinational Enterprise , 2010 .

[11]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[12]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[13]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .

[14]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[15]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Managing Tacit and Explicit Knowledge Transfer in Ijvs: The Role of Relational Embeddedness and the Impact on Performance , 2004 .

[16]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[17]  S. Winter.  Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[18]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Developing Theory Through Simulation Methods , 2006 .

[19]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[20]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[21]  Paul A. David,et al.  The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness , 2000 .

[22]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[23]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[24]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Product Sequencing: Co-Evolution of Knowledge, Capabilities and Products , 2000 .

[25]  A. Prencipe,et al.  Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms , 2001 .

[26]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[27]  P. Adler,et al.  Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive , 1996 .

[28]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[29]  D. Foray,et al.  The Economics of Codification and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 1997 .

[30]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , 1999 .

[31]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[32]  Suresh Kotha,et al.  Continuous “Morphing”: Competing Through Dynamic Capabilities, Form, and Function , 2001 .

[33]  Mikko Valorinta,et al.  Information technology and mindfulness in organizations , 2009 .

[34]  Harry G. Barkema,et al.  How Do Firms Learn to Make Acquisitions? A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future , 2008 .

[35]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation : The case of R&D , 1997 .

[36]  Sarianna M. Lundan,et al.  The Institutional Origins of Dynamic Capabilities in Multinational Enterprises , 2009 .

[37]  Gianmario Verona,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities Deconstructed: A Bibliographic Investigation into the Origins, Development, and Future Directions of the Research Domain , 2010 .

[38]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[39]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Strategy as simple rules. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[40]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Superstitious Learning with Rare Strategic Decisions: Theory and Evidence from Corporate Acquisitions , 2009, Organ. Sci..