Predicting voice quality of deaf speakers on the basis of glottal characteristics.

Twenty profoundly deaf and 5 normal-hearing subjects produced 225 sustained vowels/a, i, u/at different pitch levels and 75 phonetically balanced sentences, while vocal fold vibration was recorded through an electrolaryngograph (ELG). The utterances recorded on audio tape were judged by 10 experienced listeners on general voice quality, breathiness, hoarseness, and laryngeal strain on a 5-point scale. Seven parameters describing time-domain characteristics of the ELG-signal were extracted online by a special purpose computer system. Measurements were made over 500 consecutive vibratory cycles (10-cycle window), yielding a mean and standard deviation for each parameter per utterance. All data were submitted to analysis of variance and multiple regression analyses. Multiple correlations between glottal parameters and judged voice deviations varied between .46 and .70 indicating that overall prediction cannot reliably be based on these parameters, although severe cases of deaf voice deviations may be detectable.

[1]  A. Rosenberg.  Effect of glottal pulse shape on the quality of natural vowels. , 1969 .

[2]  P. Lieberman.  Some Acoustic Measures of the Fundamental Periodicity of Normal and Pathologic Larynges , 1963 .

[3]  E Abberton,et al.  First applications of a new laryngograph. , 1971, Medical & biological illustration.

[4]  J Lebacq,et al.  Electroglottography and vocal nodules. An attempt to quantify the shape of the signal. , 1985, Folia phoniatrica.

[5]  A Löfqvist,et al.  Laryngeal vibrations: a comparison between high-speed filming and glottographic techniques. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Y Horii,et al.  Jitter and shimmer in sustained vocal fry phonation. , 1985, Folia phoniatrica.

[7]  Directional perturbation factors for jitter and for shimmer. , 1984, Journal of communication disorders.

[8]  F. Emanuel,et al.  Some waveform and spectral features of vowel roughness. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  D. Cramon,et al.  Acoustic measurement of voice quality in central dysphonia , 1984 .

[10]  R. Whitehead,et al.  Mechanics of vocal fold vibration and laryngeal articulatory gestures produced by hearing-impaired speakers. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  R. B. Monsen.  Acoustic qualities of phonation in young hearing-impaired children. , 1979, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  H. Gilbert,et al.  Laryngograph as a measure of vocal fold contact area. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  Akira Hasegawa,et al.  Real‐time extraction of vocal quality parameters from electroglottographic signals , 1984 .

[14]  Acoustical measurements and clinical judgments of vocal quality in children with vocal nodules. , 1985, Folia phoniatrica.

[15]  I R Titze,et al.  Some technical considerations in voice perturbation measurements. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  Dirk-Jan Povel,et al.  The Visual Speech Apparatus: An aid for speech‐training of the hearing impaired , 1989 .

[17]  Norman J. Lass,et al.  Speech and Language: Advances in Basic Research and Practice , 1979 .

[18]  A. Markides.  The speech of deaf and partially-hearing children with special reference to factors affecting intelligibility. , 1970, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[19]  V. Wolfe,et al.  Prediction of vocal severity within and across voice types. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  A G Askenfelt,et al.  Speech waveform perturbation analysis: a perceptual-acoustical comparison of seven measures. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.