Incorporating polarity of relationships in ISM and TISM for theory building in information and organization management

Abstract Some mapping methods are used for the conceptualization of theories in information and organization management which may help in modeling both feedback and hierarchical structures. Total Interpretive Structural Modelling (TISM) is an enhancement of interpretive structural modeling (ISM) to explore hierarchical models that aid in theory building in information and organization management. It is based on pair comparison method to generate a hierarchical digraph, which is then translated into the interpretive model by interpreting both nodes and links in the digraph. The relationships in both ISM and TISM could be binary or fuzzy. However, a missing dimension of these structural models is the polarity or direction of relationships. A relationship between a pair of elements could be having positive or negative polarity. This aspect has been widely used in the feedback structures as causal influence diagrams (CIDs) in system dynamics methodology. This paper is using the learning from CIDs to introduce polarity of relationships in ISM and TISM. The polarity of relationships will further refine ISM/TISM as a more explanatory model for theory building. This enhanced model not only provides hypothesis formulation simply as a driver-dependence relationship but also addresses whether the driving variable(s) will influence the dependent variable positively or negatively. The paper illustrates modified TISM process incorporating polarity with an example in the context of information and organizational change management and discusses the nuances of such an enhanced model.

[1]  Ravi Kant,et al.  Modelling supplier development enablers: an integrated ISM–FMICMAC approach , 2018 .

[2]  D. Whetten What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[3]  R. G. Coyle The technical elements of the system dynamics approach , 1983 .

[4]  Sushil,et al.  Modeling organizational and information systems for effective strategy execution , 2015, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[5]  John N. Warfield,et al.  Toward Interpretation of Complex Structural Models , 1974, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[6]  Sushil,et al.  LIFE: an integrated view of meta organizational process for vitality , 2016 .

[7]  Sushil,et al.  Developing a conceptual framework of waste management in the organizational context , 2017 .

[8]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[9]  Sushil,et al.  A fuzzy set theoretic approach to qualitative analysis of causal loops in system dynamics , 1994 .

[10]  Jao-Hong Cheng,et al.  Inter-organizational relationships and information sharing in supply chains , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[11]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Explaining sustainable supply chain performance using a total interpretive structural modeling approach , 2017 .

[12]  Margaret Tan,et al.  The consequences of information technology acceptance on subsequent individual performance , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[13]  Charu Chandra,et al.  Supply chain resilience: model development and empirical analysis , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[14]  Sushil Modified ISM/TISM Process with Simultaneous Transitivity Checks for Reducing Direct Pair Comparisons , 2017, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management.

[15]  E. F. Wolstenholme Defence operational analysis using system dynamics , 1988 .

[16]  Mark Cantley Collected Papers of Jay W. Forrester , 1975 .

[17]  D. W. Malone,et al.  An introduction to the application of interpretive structural modeling , 1975, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[18]  T. Miranda Lakshmi,et al.  An information delivery model for banking business , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[19]  M. Suresh,et al.  Modelling the Enablers of Agile Performance in Healthcare Organization: A TISM Approach , 2017 .

[20]  John D. W. Morecroft,et al.  System dynamics and microworlds for policymakers , 1988 .

[21]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Organizational identity challenges in a post-merger context: A case study of an information system implementation project , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[22]  Sushil,et al.  Analysis of critical success factors of world-class manufacturing practices: an application of interpretative structural modelling and interpretative ranking process , 2012 .

[23]  Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes,et al.  Barriers in Green Lean implementation: a combined systematic literature review and interpretive structural modelling approach , 2017 .

[24]  Surya Prakash Singh,et al.  Fuzzy-TISM: A Fuzzy Extension of TISM for Group Decision Making , 2014, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management.

[25]  Cristina López,et al.  Environmental benefits of lean, green and resilient supply chain management: The case of the aerospace sector , 2017 .

[26]  Jay Wright Forrester,et al.  Urban Dynamics , 1969 .

[27]  Arpan Kumar Kar,et al.  Critical Success Factors to Establish 5G Network in Smart Cities: Inputs for Security and Privacy , 2017, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[28]  Stewart Robinson,et al.  The application of discrete event simulation and system dynamics in the logistics and supply chain context , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[29]  Sushil INTERPRETIVE MATRIX: A TOOL TO AID INTERPRETATION OF MANAGEMENT AND SOCIAL RESEARCH , 2005 .

[30]  John W. Cadogan,et al.  Partner Symmetries, Partner Conflict and the Quality of Joint Venture Marketing Strategy: An Empirical Investigation , 2001 .

[31]  Prem Vrat,et al.  Impact of indirect relationships in classification of variables—a micmac analysis for energy conservation , 1990 .

[32]  Sushil,et al.  The objectives of waste management in India: A futures inquiry , 1995 .

[33]  Sushil,et al.  Cognitive bias in salespersons in specialty drug selling of pharmaceutical industry , 2012 .

[34]  Sushil Multi-criteria valuation of flexibility initiatives using integrated TISM – IRP with a big data framework , 2017 .

[35]  Pradeep Kumar,et al.  Modelling Inland Waterborne Transport for Supply Chain Policy Planning: An Indian Perspective , 2017 .

[36]  John N. Warfield,et al.  World dynamics , 1973 .

[37]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Trustworthiness of digital government services: deriving a comprehensive theory through interpretive structural modelling , 2018, Digital Government and Public Management.

[38]  J. Forrester Industrial Dynamics: A Major Breakthrough for Decision Makers , 2012 .

[39]  Sushil,et al.  Interpretive multi-criteria valuation of flexibility initiatives on direct value chain , 2018, Benchmarking: An International Journal.

[40]  Mahesh Chand,et al.  Analysis of flexibility factors in Sustainable Supply Chain using Total Interpretive Structural Modeling (T-ISM) Technique , 2018 .

[41]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  Interpretive structural modeling (ISM) of IT-enablers for Indian manufacturing SMEs , 2008, Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur..

[42]  Sushil,et al.  Flexibility in Modification and Termination of Cross-Border Joint Ventures , 2017 .

[43]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[44]  Sushil,et al.  Scenario building: A critical study of energy conservation in the Indian cement industry , 1992 .

[45]  Sushil,et al.  Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainable Enterprise: Evolving a Conceptual Framework, and a Case Study of ITC , 2018 .

[46]  J. Sterman Business Dynamics , 2000 .

[47]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view , 2008, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[48]  Fred Niederman,et al.  Integrating the IS functions after mergers and acquisitions: Analyzing business-IT alignment , 2014, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Jae Choi,et al.  A system dynamics model for information security management , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[50]  R. G. Coyle,et al.  The Development of System Dynamics as a Methodology for System Description and Qualitative Analysis , 1983 .

[51]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Introduction to System Dynamics Modeling with DYNAMO , 1981 .

[52]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Enablers and Barriers of Flexible Green Supply Chain Management: A Total Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach , 2016 .

[53]  Sushil Interpreting the Interpretive Structural Model , 2012, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management.

[54]  S. Deshmukh,et al.  Vendor Selection Using Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) , 1994 .

[55]  Santosh Rangnekar,et al.  Workplace Flexibility Dimensions as Enablers of Organizational Citizenship Behavior , 2016 .

[56]  Alpana Agarwal,et al.  A TISM Based Bionic Model of Organizational Excellence , 2015 .

[57]  Ali E. Akgün,et al.  Team learning in IT implementation projects: Antecedents and consequences , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[58]  James B. Thomas,et al.  Interpreting Strategic Issues: Effects of Strategy and the Information-Processing Structure of Top Management Teams , 1990 .

[59]  Sushil Interpretive Ranking Process , 2009 .

[60]  Erik Perjons,et al.  An evaluation framework for comparing business-IT alignment models: A tool for supporting collaborative learning in organizations , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[61]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Information systems project failure – analysis of causal links using interpretive structural modelling , 2016 .

[62]  Petter Gottschalk A system dynamics model for long range planning in railroad , 1983 .

[63]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[64]  Sushil,et al.  Modeling strategic performance management of automobile manufacturing enterprises , 2015 .

[65]  Evangelos Katsamakas,et al.  Information systems research with system dynamics , 2008 .

[66]  Mahamaya Mohanty,et al.  Modelling uncertainty in sustainable integrated logistics using Fuzzy-TISM , 2017 .

[67]  Sushil How to check correctness of total interpretive structural models? , 2016, Annals of Operations Research.

[68]  V. Venkatesh,et al.  Analysis on supply chain risks in Indian apparel retail chains and proposal of risk prioritization model using Interpretive structural modeling , 2015 .

[69]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Mapping IS failure factors on PRINCE2® stages: an application of Interpretive Ranking Process (IRP) , 2017 .

[70]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Building theory of sustainable manufacturing using total interpretive structural modelling , 2015 .

[71]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Driving innovation through big open linked data (BOLD): Exploring antecedents using interpretive structural modelling , 2016, Information Systems Frontiers.