Cybernetics as the science of decision making

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present decision making as the decisive activity of controllers, necessary to correct deviations from a goal value in controlled systems by deciding on goal‐oriented actions.Design/methodology/approach – Using a functional approach it is shown how an increasing complexity of controller structures follows an increasing ability to make more complex decisions. Two applications are used to analyze that in detail: first, the controller structures necessary for Miller's living systems and for Beer's viable systems are presented in one comparable scheme. Second, a complex controller structure illustrates the basic requirements for a brain.Findings – Analyzing necessary decisions in Beer's viable systems it is shown how the elementary decisions found in feedback systems can be used as a first approximation for decision making. Hence, it is shown how principles of decision making determine the development of complex controller structures.Practical implications – The paper ...

[1]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[2]  S. Beer The Brain of the Firm , 1972 .

[3]  Zdravko Krivokapic,et al.  Evaluation of environmental impacts using backpropagation neural network , 2013, Kybernetes.

[4]  Helmut Nechansky,et al.  Issues of organizational cybernetics and viability beyond Beer’s viable systems model , 2013, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[5]  James G. Miller,et al.  Introduction: the nature of living systems , 1990 .

[6]  Helmut Nechansky Elements of a cybernetic epistemology: output-side attention directing systems , 2012, Kybernetes.

[7]  Helmut Nechansky Elements of a cybernetic epistemology: Design rules for complex goal-orientated systems , 2009 .

[8]  Helmut Nechansky,et al.  Elements of a cybernetic epistemology: The four modes of coexistence of goal-orientated systems , 2007, Kybernetes.

[9]  Helmut Nechansky,et al.  Elements of a cybernetic epistemology: Decisions, control and principles of societal organization , 2008, Kybernetes.

[10]  Helmut Nechansky The relationship between: Miller's living systems theory and Beer's viable systems theory , 2009 .

[11]  Helmut Nechansky,et al.  Elements of a cybernetic epistemology: Pattern recognition, learning and the base of individual psychology , 2012, Kybernetes.

[12]  Günter Ludyk Theoretische Regelungstechnik 2 , 1995 .

[13]  Helmut Nechansky,et al.  The cybernetics of viability: an overview , 2011, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[14]  Helmut Nechansky,et al.  Elements of a cybernetic epistemology: preprogrammed adaptive systems , 2010, Kybernetes.

[15]  Günter Ludyk Theoretische Regelungstechnik 1 , 1995 .

[16]  Helmut Nechansky,et al.  Elements of a cybernetic epistemology: Adaptive systems that can develop system-specific behavior , 2010, Kybernetes.

[17]  Helmut Nechansky,et al.  The cybernetics of social change - and history , 2008, Kybernetes.