Evaluation of the Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Comparison of Right-Sided and Left-Sided Resections

Objective:To provide a multidimensional analysis of the learning curve in major laparoscopic colonic and rectal surgery and compare outcomes between right-sided versus left-sided resections. Summary Background Data:The laparoscopic learning curve is known to vary between surgeons, may be influenced by the patient selection and operative complexity, and requires appropriate case-mix adjustment. Methods:This is a descriptive single-center study using routinely collected clinical data from 900 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery between November 1991 and April 2003. Outcome measures included operation time, conversion rate (CR), and readmission and postoperative complication rates. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis was used to identify patient-, surgeon-, and procedure-related factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery. A risk-adjusted Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) model was used for evaluating the learning curve for right and left-sided resections. Results:The conversion rate for right-sided colonic resections was 8.1% (n = 457) compared with 15.3% for left-sided colorectal resections (n = 443). Independent predictors of conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery were the body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.07 per unit increase), ASA grade (OR = 1.63 per unit increase), type of resection (left colorectal versus right colonic procedures, OR = 1.5), presence of intra-abdominal abscess (OR = 5.0) or enteric fistula (OR = 4.6), and surgeon's experience (OR 0.9 per 10 additional cases performed). Having adjusted for case-mix, the CUSUM analysis demonstrated a learning curve of 55 cases for right-sided colonic resections versus 62 cases for left-sided resections. Median operative time declined with operative experience (P<0.001). Readmission rates and postoperative complications remained unchanged throughout the series and were not dependent on operative experience. Conclusions:Conversion rates for laparoscopic colectomy are dependent on a multitude of factors that require appropriate adjustment including the learning curve (operative experience) for individual surgeons. The laparoscopic model described can be used as the basis for performance monitoring between or within institutions.

[1]  A. Senagore,et al.  Case-Matched Comparison of Clinical and Financial Outcome After Laparoscopic or Open Colorectal Surgery , 2003, Annals of surgery.

[2]  E. Weiss,et al.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery , 1997, Surgical Endoscop.

[3]  M. Cadeddu,et al.  Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections , 2001, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[4]  A. Senagore,et al.  Cost Structure of Laparoscopic and Open Sigmoid Colectomy for Diverticular Disease , 2002, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[5]  E. Weiss,et al.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Do we get faster? , 1997, Surgical endoscopy.

[6]  A. Voitk,et al.  The tail of the learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. , 2001, American journal of surgery.

[7]  J. Murray,et al.  Laparoscopic colectomy: indications for conversion to laparotomy. , 1999, Archives of surgery.

[8]  J. Fleshman,et al.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  A. Hasan,et al.  New surgical procedures: can we minimise the learning curve? , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  M. Cadeddu,et al.  Predicting conversion to open surgery in laparoscopic colorectal resections , 2000, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  J. Monson,et al.  Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal malignancy , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[12]  F. Harrell,et al.  Prognostic/Clinical Prediction Models: Multivariable Prognostic Models: Issues in Developing Models, Evaluating Assumptions and Adequacy, and Measuring and Reducing Errors , 2005 .

[13]  Andrew F Monk,et al.  ASSESSING THE LEARNING CURVE EFFECT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES , 2002, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[14]  S. Stryker,et al.  The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. , 1997, Archives of surgery.

[15]  O. Schwandner,et al.  Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery:A Five-Year Experience , 1999, Digestive Surgery.

[16]  H. Bruch,et al.  Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery , 2001, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[17]  Chris Sherlaw-Johnson,et al.  Monitoring the results of cardiac surgery by variable life-adjusted display , 1997, The Lancet.

[18]  Daniel B. Mark,et al.  TUTORIAL IN BIOSTATISTICS MULTIVARIABLE PROGNOSTIC MODELS: ISSUES IN DEVELOPING MODELS, EVALUATING ASSUMPTIONS AND ADEQUACY, AND MEASURING AND REDUCING ERRORS , 1996 .

[19]  P Littlejohns,et al.  Cumulative risk adjusted mortality chart for detecting changes in death rate: observational study of heart surgery , 1998, BMJ.

[20]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Factors that predict conversion in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[21]  R. Beart,et al.  Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy learning curve , 1995, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[22]  J. Steurer,et al.  Multidimensional Analysis of Learning Curves in Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection , 2003, Diseases of the colon and rectum.