Applications of step-selection functions in ecology and conservation

Recent progress in positioning technology facilitates the collection of massive amounts of sequential spatial data on animals. This has led to new opportunities and challenges when investigating animal movement behaviour and habitat selection. Tools like Step Selection Functions (SSFs) are relatively new powerful models for studying resource selection by animals moving through the landscape. SSFs compare environmental attributes of observed steps (the linear segment between two consecutive observations of position) with alternative random steps taken from the same starting point. SSFs have been used to study habitat selection, human-wildlife interactions, movement corridors, and dispersal behaviours in animals. SSFs also have the potential to depict resource selection at multiple spatial and temporal scales. There are several aspects of SSFs where consensus has not yet been reached such as how to analyse the data, when to consider habitat covariates along linear paths between observations rather than at their endpoints, how many random steps should be considered to measure availability, and how to account for individual variation. In this review we aim to address all these issues, as well as to highlight weak features of this modelling approach that should be developed by further research. Finally, we suggest that SSFs could be integrated with state-space models to classify behavioural states when estimating SSFs.

[1]  Bram Van Moorter,et al.  Landscape composition influences roe deer habitat selection at both home range and landscape scales , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[2]  Subhash R Lele,et al.  Weighted distributions and estimation of resource selection probability functions. , 2006, Ecology.

[3]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Resource Selection Functions Based on Use–Availability Data: Theoretical Motivation and Evaluation Methods , 2006 .

[4]  Kurt E Anderson,et al.  Scaling population responses to spatial environmental variability in advection-dominated systems. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[5]  Mark S Boyce,et al.  Correlation and studies of habitat selection: problem, red herring or opportunity? , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  D. Grémillet,et al.  GPS tracking a marine predator: the effects of precision, resolution and sampling rate on foraging tracks of African Penguins , 2004 .

[7]  S. Lele A New Method for Estimation of Resource Selection Probability Function , 2009 .

[8]  Francesca Cagnacci,et al.  Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Ian D. Jonsen,et al.  ROBUST STATE-SPACE MODELING OF ANIMAL MOVEMENT DATA , 2005 .

[10]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Fine-scale disturbances shape space-use patterns of a boreal forest herbivore , 2010 .

[11]  Mark Hebblewhite,et al.  Modelling wildlife–human relationships for social species with mixed‐effects resource selection models , 2007 .

[12]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  Assessing habitat selection when availability changes , 1996 .

[13]  Stanley M Tomkiewicz,et al.  Global positioning system and associated technologies in animal behaviour and ecological research , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Movement parameters of ungulates and scale‐specific responses to the environment , 2002 .

[15]  Louie H. Yang,et al.  The Ecology of Individuals: Incidence and Implications of Individual Specialization , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[16]  F. Kienast,et al.  Predicting the potential distribution of plant species in an alpine environment , 1998 .

[17]  G. Stenhouse,et al.  Grizzly bears and forestry I: Selection of clearcuts by grizzly bears in west-central Alberta, Canada , 2004 .

[18]  G. Stenhouse,et al.  Modeling grizzly bear habitats in the Yellowhead ecosystem of Alberta: taking autocorrelation seriously , 2002 .

[19]  Paul J Rathouz,et al.  Accounting for animal movement in estimation of resource selection functions: sampling and data analysis. , 2009, Ecology.

[20]  Vilis O Nams,et al.  Sampling Animal Movement Paths Causes Turn Autocorrelation , 2013, Acta biotheoretica.

[21]  Darcy R. Visscher,et al.  GPS MEASUREMENT ERROR INFLUENCES ON MOVEMENT MODEL PARAMETERIZATION , 2005 .

[22]  Franz J Weissing,et al.  Animal personalities: consequences for ecology and evolution. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  Jason Matthiopoulos,et al.  Generalized functional responses for species distributions. , 2011, Ecology.

[24]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Scale and heterogeneity in habitat selection by elk in Yellowstone National Park , 2003 .

[25]  Simon Wotherspoon,et al.  Nest selection by snow petrels Pagodroma nivea in East Antarctica: Validating predictive habitat selection models at the continental scale , 2008 .

[26]  P. Beier,et al.  INFLUENCE OF VEGETATION, TOPOGRAPHY, AND ROADS ON COUGAR MOVEMENT IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA , 2005 .

[27]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Sensitivity of species-distribution models to error, bias, and model design: An application to resource selection functions for woodland caribou , 2008 .

[28]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression , 2000 .

[29]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Corridors for Conservation: Integrating Pattern and Process , 2006 .

[30]  Bram Van Moorter,et al.  Moose Alces alces habitat use at multiple temporal scales in a human-altered landscape , 2011 .

[31]  Mevin B Hooten,et al.  Practical guidance on characterizing availability in resource selection functions under a use-availability design. , 2013, Ecology.

[32]  M. Hebblewhite,et al.  Transcending scale dependence in identifying habitat with resource selection functions. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[33]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Scale for resource selection functions , 2006 .

[34]  John G. Kie,et al.  Sexual segregation in black-tailed deer : effects of scale , 1996 .

[35]  K. Train,et al.  Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[36]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Vehicle traffic shapes grizzly bear behaviour on a multiple‐use landscape , 2012 .

[37]  Aurélie Coulon,et al.  Inferring the effects of landscape structure on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) movements using a step selection function , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[38]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[39]  Yvan Richard,et al.  Cost distance modelling of landscape connectivity and gap‐crossing ability using radio‐tracking data , 2010 .

[40]  Nathalie Pettorelli,et al.  The response of fawn survival to changes in habitat quality varies according to cohort quality and spatial scale , 2005 .

[41]  M. Fortin,et al.  Spatial statistics, spatial regression, and graph theory in ecology , 2012 .

[42]  Bram Van Moorter,et al.  Temperature-mediated habitat use and selection by a heat-sensitive northern ungulate , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  Devin S Johnson,et al.  A General Framework for the Analysis of Animal Resource Selection from Telemetry Data , 2008, Biometrics.

[44]  Atle Mysterud,et al.  Temporal scales, trade-offs, and functional responses in red deer habitat selection. , 2009, Ecology.

[45]  M. Boyce,et al.  WOLVES INFLUENCE ELK MOVEMENTS: BEHAVIOR SHAPES A TROPHIC CASCADE IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK , 2005 .

[46]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[47]  Mathieu Leblond,et al.  What drives fine-scale movements of large herbivores? A case study using moose , 2010 .

[48]  Sean A. Parks,et al.  Combining resource selection and movement behavior to predict corridors for Canada lynx at their southern range periphery , 2013 .

[49]  Douglas H. Johnson THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[50]  F. Cagnacci,et al.  Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  Olof Liberg,et al.  Encounter frequencies between GPS-collared wolves (Canis lupus) and moose (Alces alces) in a Scandinavian wolf territory , 2009, Ecological Research.

[52]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Habitat–performance relationships: finding the right metric at a given spatial scale , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[53]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Grizzly bear movements relative to roads: application of step selection functions , 2010 .

[54]  Holger Dettki,et al.  Habitat use and spatial patterns of wild boar Sus scrofa (L.): agricultural fields and edges , 2009, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[55]  John M. Fryxell,et al.  The scale-dependent impact of wolf predation risk on resource selection by three sympatric ungulates , 2008, Oecologia.

[56]  Paul R Moorcroft,et al.  Mechanistic home range models capture spatial patterns and dynamics of coyote territories in Yellowstone , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[57]  A. Hirzel,et al.  Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences , 2006 .

[58]  Cameron S Gillies,et al.  Fine-scale movement decisions of tropical forest birds in a fragmented landscape. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[59]  Juan M. Morales,et al.  EXTRACTING MORE OUT OF RELOCATION DATA: BUILDING MOVEMENT MODELS AS MIXTURES OF RANDOM WALKS , 2004 .

[60]  RYAN M. NIELSON,et al.  Winter Habitat Selection of Mule Deer Before and During Development of a Natural Gas Field , 2006 .

[61]  M. Boyce,et al.  Evaluating resource selection functions , 2002 .

[62]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Scale-dependent trade-offs in foraging by European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) during winter , 1999 .

[63]  B. Manly,et al.  Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. , 1994 .

[64]  R. Bonduriansky,et al.  Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance of home range estimates , 1999 .

[65]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Mixed conditional logistic regression for habitat selection studies. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[66]  P. Turchin Quantitative analysis of movement : measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants , 1998 .

[67]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Movement responses by wolves to industrial linear features and their effect on woodland caribou in northeastern Alberta , 2011 .