Total inward leakage of nanoparticles through filtering facepiece respirators.

Nanoparticle (<100 nm size) exposure in workplaces is a major concern because of the potential impact on human health. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-approved particulate respirators are recommended for protection against nanoparticles based on their filtration efficiency at sealed conditions. Concerns have been raised on the lack of information for face seal leakage of nanoparticles, compromising respiratory protection in workplaces. To address this issue, filter penetration and total inward leakage (TIL) through artificial leaks were measured for NIOSH-approved N95 and P100 and European certified Conformit'e Europe'en-marked FFP2 and FFP3 filtering facepiece respirator models sealed to a breathing manikin kept inside a closed chamber. Monodisperse sucrose aerosols (8-80 nm size) generated by electrospray or polydisperse NaCl aerosols (20-1000 nm size) produced by atomization were passed into the chamber. Filter penetration and TIL were measured at 20, 30, and 40 l min(-1) breathing flow rates. The most penetrating particle size (MPPS) was ∼50 nm and filter penetrations for 50 and 100 nm size particles were markedly higher than the penetrations for 8 and 400 nm size particles. Filter penetrations increased with increasing flow rates. With artificially introduced leaks, the TIL values for all size particles increased with increasing leak sizes. With relatively smaller size leaks, the TIL measured for 50 nm size particles was ∼2-fold higher than the values for 8 and 400 nm size particles indicating that the TIL for the most penetrating particles was higher than for smaller and larger size particles. The data indicate that higher concentration of nanoparticles could occur inside the breathing zone of respirators in workplaces where nanoparticles in the MPPS range are present, when leakage is minimal compared to filter penetration. The TIL/penetration ratios obtained for 400 nm size particles were larger than the ratios obtained for 50 nm size particles at the three different flow rates and leak sizes indicating that face seal leakage, not filter penetration, contributing to the TIL for larger size particles. Further studies on face seal leakage of nanoparticles for respirator users in workplaces are needed to better understand the respiratory protection against nanoparticle exposure.

[1]  Sheng-Hsiu Huang,et al.  Penetration of 4.5nm to aerosol particles through fibrous filters , 2007 .

[2]  Klaus Willeke,et al.  Development of a Dichotomous-Flow Quantitative Fit Test for Half-Mask and Full-Facepiece Respirators , 1994 .

[3]  A. Hart,et al.  Exposure to nanoscale particles and fibers during machining of hybrid advanced composites containing carbon nanotubes , 2009 .

[4]  Samy Rengasamy,et al.  Filtration Performance of NIOSH-Approved N95 and P100 Filtering Facepiece Respirators Against 4 to 30 Nanometer-Size Nanoparticles , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[5]  Jeffery A. Steevens,et al.  Potential for Occupational Exposure to Engineered Carbon-Based Nanomaterials in Environmental Laboratory Studies , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[6]  T Myojo,et al.  Variation in quantitative respirator fit factors due to fluctuations in leak size during fit testing. , 1994, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[7]  Paul Schulte,et al.  Occupational Risk Management of Engineered Nanoparticles , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[8]  D. Bémer,et al.  Penetration of nanoparticles through fibrous filters perforated with defined pinholes , 2009 .

[9]  Laura Hodson,et al.  Approaches to safe nanotechnology; managing the health and safety concerns associated with engineered nanomaterials , 2009 .

[10]  Samy Rengasamy Nanoparticle Penetration through NIOSH-Approved N95 Filtering-facepiece Respirators , 2007 .

[11]  C. Chen,et al.  279. Penetration of 4.5 nm to 10 IM Aerosol Particles through Fibrous Filters , 2006 .

[12]  K. Willeke,et al.  Filter and leak penetration characteristics of a dust and mist filtering facepiece. , 1990, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[13]  W C Hinds,et al.  Performance of dust respirators with facial seal leaks: II. Predictive model. , 1987, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[14]  E. Moyer,et al.  Electrostatic respirator filter media: filter efficiency and most penetrating particle size effects. , 2000, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[15]  W C Hinds,et al.  Common materials for emergency respiratory protection: leakage tests with a manikin. , 1983, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[16]  Robert Weber,et al.  The Effect of Pressure Drop on Respirator Faceseal Leakage , 2005, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[18]  W C Hinds,et al.  Performance of dust respirators with facial seal leaks: I. Experimental. , 1987, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[19]  Christian Micheletti,et al.  Engineered nanoparticles: Review of health and environmental safety (ENRHES). Project Final Report , 2010 .

[20]  P. D. Gardner,et al.  N95 and P100 Respirator Filter Efficiency Under High Constant and Cyclic Flow , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[21]  Susan G. Danisch,et al.  Respirator Leak Detection by Ultrafine Aerosols: A Predictive Model and Experimental Study , 1993 .

[22]  C D Crutchfield,et al.  Effect of leak location on measured respirator fit. , 1997, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[23]  R K Oestenstad,et al.  Distribution of faceseal leak sites on a half-mask respirator and their association with facial dimensions. , 1990, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[24]  T. Tuomi,et al.  Face seal leakage of half masks and surgical masks. , 1985, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[25]  C C Coffey,et al.  Performance of N95 respirators: filtration efficiency for airborne microbial and inert particles. , 1998, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[26]  K Willeke,et al.  Particle size-dependent leakage and losses of aerosols in respirators. , 1987, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[27]  Warren R. Myers,et al.  Field Performance Measurements of Half-Facepiece Respirators—Study Protocol , 1995 .

[28]  Douglas W. Cooper,et al.  Emergency Respiratory Protection with Common Materials , 1983 .

[29]  Tiina Reponen,et al.  Manikin-based performance evaluation of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators challenged with nanoparticles. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[30]  R. Shaffer,et al.  Comparison of nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSH-approved and CE-marked particulate filtering facepiece respirators. , 2009, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[31]  Tiina Reponen,et al.  Performance of an N95 Filtering Facepiece Particulate Respirator and a Surgical Mask During Human Breathing: Two Pathways for Particle Penetration , 2009, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[32]  Samy Rengasamy,et al.  Respiratory protection against airborne nanoparticles: a review , 2009 .