Influence of joint component mechanical properties and adhesive layer thickness on stress distribution in micro-tensile bond strength specimens.

OBJECTIVES Differences in mechanical properties between adherents and adhesive result in stress singularity at the free edge for tensile test specimens. Beyond causing premature failures, these also trigger fracture initiation at the bond edge, where the use of the maximum stress at failure as a measure of strength is not a reliable parameter for obtaining bond strength. The aim of this study is to describe the pattern of stress concentration along the interface for micro-tensile bond strength (microTBS) specimens. Also, possible sources of variation in stress concentration (adhesive layer thickness and mechanical properties) were evaluated using the finite element method. METHODS One-fourth models of typical microTBS specimens were created using axisymmetric elements. A 15MPa load was applied at the outer edge and finite element calculations were performed within the elastic deformation range. In the first set of runs, the adhesive thickness was varied and in the second set, different nu/E ratios between the adhesive and the adherent were assigned. RESULTS When adhesive thickness increased, a significant increase in stress concentration at the free edge and in the length of the stress-affected area was observed. Increasing the nu/E ratio between adhesive and adherent lead to an increase in stress concentration at the free edge area without change in length of the stress-affected area. SIGNIFICANCE If mechanical properties and adhesive thickness expected for a specific composite-dentin bond combination in microTBS specimens are known, stress concentration at the interface can be predicted. The adhesive thickness should remain constant when comparing different joints, as it facilitates the interpretation of nominal strength values.

[1]  Robert Lacombe,et al.  Adhesion Measurement Methods: Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[2]  R. L. Patrick Treatise on Adhesion and Adhesives , 1967 .

[3]  David E. Packham,et al.  Handbook of adhesion , 1992 .

[4]  L. V. van Ruijven,et al.  The Influence of Specimen Attachment and Dimension on Microtensile Strength , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[5]  R. Adams,et al.  The Stress-Strain Behaviour of Axially-Loaded Butt Joints , 1979 .

[6]  K. Devries,et al.  Predicting strength of adhesive joints from test results , 1989 .

[7]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. , 2003, Operative dentistry.

[8]  J. Tagami,et al.  Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. , 2001, Operative dentistry.

[9]  G W Marshall,et al.  A micromechanics model of the elastic properties of human dentine. , 1999, Archives of oral biology.

[10]  D. Pashley,et al.  The microtensile bond test: a review. , 1999, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[11]  L. Paulillo,et al.  Influence of additional adhesive application on the microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems. , 2006, Operative dentistry.

[12]  R. G. Lima,et al.  Geometrical aspects on bi-material microtensile tests , 2005 .

[13]  A. C. Vieira,et al.  Corrigendum to: “Bond angle effects on microtensile bonds: Laboratory and FEA comparison” [Dental Materials 22 (2006) 314–324] , 2008 .

[14]  R. S. Alwar,et al.  Elastic Analysis of Adhesive Butt Joints , 1976 .

[15]  D. Munz,et al.  Stresses near the edge of bonded dissimilar materials described by two stress intensity factors , 1993 .

[16]  M. Tyas,et al.  The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. , 1998, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[17]  I. C. Howard,et al.  A critique of bond strength measurements. , 1989, Journal of dentistry.

[18]  D. Pashley,et al.  Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength--evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. , 1994, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[19]  K. L. Devries,et al.  Analysis and testing of adhesive bonds , 1977 .

[20]  T. R. Guess,et al.  Interface Corner Failure Analysis of Joint Strength: Effect of Adherend Stiffness , 1997 .

[21]  T. Sawa,et al.  Stress analysis and strength estimation of butt adhesive joints of dissimilar hollow cylinders under impact tensile loadings , 2003 .

[22]  A. D. Crocombe,et al.  Simplified finite element modelling of structural adhesive joints , 1996 .

[23]  T. R. Guess,et al.  Comparison of butt tensile strength data with interface corner stress intensity factor prediction , 1993 .

[24]  Alfred Rotimi Akisanya,et al.  On the singular stress field near the edge of bonded joints , 1997 .

[25]  A. C. Vieira,et al.  Bond angle effects on microtensile bonds: laboratory and FEA comparison. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[26]  A. Kinloch Adhesion and Adhesives: Science and Technology , 2010 .

[27]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Dynamic elastic modulus of 'packable' composites. , 2001, Dental Materials.

[28]  D. Munz,et al.  Stress Singularities at the Interface in Bonded Dissimilar Materials Under Mechanical and Thermal Loading , 1992 .

[29]  David B. Bogy,et al.  On the problem of edge-bonded elastic quarter-planes loaded at the boundary , 1970 .

[30]  T. Sawa,et al.  Axisymmetric stress analysis of adhesive butt joints of dissimilar solid cylinders subjected to external tensile loads , 1989 .

[31]  E. Reedy Connection between interface corner and interfacial fracture analyses of an adhesively-bonded butt joint , 2000 .