Understanding PSM Interventions Through Sense-Making and the Mangle of Practice Lens

In this paper we seek to understand how individuals, as part of a group facilitated modelling setting, commit themselves to a set of actions, as a basis of sense-making, sense-giving and coordinated actions. For this we introduce Pickering’s Mangle of Practice to understand the practice of a group facilitated modelling setting. Using video data from a group modelling building exercise, we analyze how individual actors framed their circumstances in communication with one another and how through facilitated model building this affected their subsequent interpretation and decisions as the process unfolds. We show how, through the models as objects enhanced the interaction between verbal communication, expressed and felt emotion and material cues led to collective behavior within the group. With our study we extend prior research and elaborate on the role of objects and materiality as part of group decision making.

[1]  Patrick McNeill In the Dock , 1991 .

[2]  L. White,et al.  Evaluating problem-structuring methods: developing an approach to show the value and effectiveness of PSMs , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[3]  Colin Eden,et al.  On evaluating the performance of 'wide-band' GDSS's , 1995 .

[4]  Leroy White,et al.  The Non-Codified Use of Problem Structuring Methods and the Need for a Generic Constitutive Definition , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 1 of 2: Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[6]  L. Alberto Franco,et al.  Forms of conversation and problem structuring methods: a conceptual development , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[7]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology: a 30-year retrospective , 1999 .

[8]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Problem structuring methods in action , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking , 2005 .

[10]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[11]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Cognition (2nd ed.). , 1987 .

[12]  Leroy White,et al.  Understanding problem structuring methods interventions , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Paul Shabajee,et al.  STEEP Project Deliverable D2.1 Energy Master Plan Process Modelling: Project no. 314277 STEEP PROJECT. Systems Thinking for Comprehensive City Efficient Energy Planning Seventh Framework Programme Theme Energy. , 2015 .

[14]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Cognitive mapping expert views for policy analysis in the public sector , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  W. Blatchford Getting a yes.... , 1992, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[16]  S. Maitlis,et al.  Triggers And Enablers Of Sensegiving In Organizations , 2007 .

[17]  N.A.D. Connell,et al.  Evaluating soft OR: some reflections on an apparently ‘unsuccessful’ implementation using a Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) based approach , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[18]  A. MacDonald,et al.  Problem-structuring methods and project management: an example of stakeholder involvement using Hierarchical Process Modelling methodology , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[19]  L. Smircich,et al.  Leadership: The Management of Meaning , 1982, The Journal of applied behavioral science.

[20]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation , 1991 .

[21]  Andrew Pickering,et al.  The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .

[22]  Anthony J. Culyer,et al.  Problem Structuring Methods , 2014 .

[23]  R. Kemp,et al.  Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development , 2007 .

[24]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[25]  A. Pickering The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emergence in the Sociology of Science , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[27]  Giles A. Hindle Case Article - Teaching Soft Systems Methodology and a Blueprint for a Module , 2011, INFORMS Trans. Educ..

[28]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Problem structuring methods 'in the Dock': Arguing the case for Soft OR , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  F. Geels Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective , 2010 .

[30]  R. Emerson,et al.  Working With ‘Key Incidents’ , 2004 .

[31]  John P. Davis,et al.  An argumentation-based method for managing complex issues in design of infrastructural systems , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[32]  Gilberto Montibeller,et al.  Decision and risk analysis for the evaluation of strategic options , 2007 .

[33]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social cognition, 2nd ed. , 1991 .

[34]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice: Includes a 30-Year Retrospective , 1999 .

[35]  Colin Eden,et al.  Group Decision and Negotiation in Strategy Making , 2001 .

[36]  L. Alberto Franco,et al.  Exploring new directions for research in problem structuring methods: on the role of cognitive style , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[37]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  The Art and Science of Mess Management , 1981 .

[38]  Colin Eden,et al.  Negotiation in Strategy Making Teams: Group Support Systems and the Process of Cognitive Change , 2011 .

[39]  Richard J. Ormerod,et al.  The mangle of OR practice: towards more informative case studies of ‘technical’ projects , 2014, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[40]  C. Frith Social cognition , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  L. Alberto Franco,et al.  Rethinking Soft OR interventions: Models as boundary objects , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..