Biomarker development for myasthenia gravis

Biomarkers are defined as characteristics (e.g., proteins, RNA, single nucleotide polymorphisms, imaging) that are objectively measured and evaluated as indicators of pathogenic processes or pharmacologic responses to therapeutic intervention. Biomarkers are important in clinical trials where the robust biomarker reflects the underlying disease process in a sensitive and reliable manner. For myasthenia gravis (MG), acetylcholine receptor and muscle‐specific kinase antibodies, as well as single‐fiber electromyography, serve as excellent biomarkers for diagnosis but do not adequately substitute for clinical evaluations to predict treatment response. New technologies are emerging that enable broad biomarker discovery in biological fluids. Biomarker evaluation is ideally done in the context of longitudinal clinical trials. The MGTX trial has collected plasma and serum for RNA and protein analysis and thymus, which will allow robust biomarker discovery. The ultimate goal will be to identify candidates for a reliable substitute for a clinically meaningful end point that is a direct measure of the effectiveness of a therapy in the context of a continuum of disease natural history and a patient's overall well‐being.

[1]  R. Mantegazza,et al.  A New Thiopurine S‐Methyltransferase Haplotype Associated With Intolerance to Azathioprine , 2013, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[2]  M. Benatar,et al.  Recommendations for myasthenia gravis clinical trials , 2012, Muscle & nerve.

[3]  R. Conwit,et al.  Implementing clinical trials on an international platform: Challenges and perspectives , 2012, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[4]  Kimberly Scearce-Levie,et al.  Animal Models of Alzheimer's Disease: Modeling Targets, Not Disease Accelerating Drug Discovery for Alzheimer's Disease: Best Practices for Preclinical Animal Studies , 2022 .

[5]  P. Christadoss,et al.  Complement and cytokine based therapeutic strategies in myasthenia gravis. , 2011, Journal of autoimmunity.

[6]  S. H. van der Burg,et al.  Recommendations from the iSBTc-SITC/FDA/NCI Workshop on Immunotherapy Biomarkers , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  D. Cacchiarelli,et al.  miRNAs as serum biomarkers for Duchenne muscular dystrophy , 2011, EMBO molecular medicine.

[8]  D. Sanders,et al.  Update on muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibody positive myasthenia gravis. , 2010, Current opinion in neurology.

[9]  A. Vincent,et al.  Autoimmune Channelopathies: Well-Established and Emerging Immunotherapy-Responsive Diseases of the Peripheral and Central Nervous Systems , 2010, Journal of Clinical Immunology.

[10]  Charles C. Persinger,et al.  How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[11]  V. Bajic,et al.  A functional SNP in the regulatory region of the decay-accelerating factor gene associates with extraocular muscle pareses in myasthenia gravis , 2009, Genes and Immunity.

[12]  Weidong Zhou,et al.  Core-Shell Hydrogel Particles Harvest, Concentrate and Preserve Labile Low Abundance Biomarkers , 2009, PloS one.

[13]  D. Richman,et al.  An international, phase III, randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil in myasthenia gravis , 2008, Neurology.

[14]  A trial of mycophenolate mofetil with prednisone as initial immunotherapy in myasthenia gravis , 2008, Neurology.

[15]  R. Conwit,et al.  Status of the Thymectomy Trial for Nonthymomatous Myasthenia Gravis Patients Receiving Prednisone , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[16]  I. Kola,et al.  The State of Innovation in Drug Development , 2008, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[17]  R. Weinshilboum,et al.  Metabolomics: a global biochemical approach to drug response and disease. , 2008, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[18]  H. Kaminski,et al.  Effect of complement and its regulation on myasthenia gravis pathogenesis , 2008, Expert review of clinical immunology.

[19]  J. Mendell,et al.  Challenges in drug development for muscle disease: A stakeholders' meeting , 2007, Muscle & nerve.

[20]  Monica Milani,et al.  Myasthenia gravis: past, present, and future. , 2006, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[21]  Alex Matter,et al.  Glivec (STI571, imatinib), a rationally developed, targeted anticancer drug , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[22]  R. Barohn,et al.  Myasthenia gravis , 2000, Neurology.

[23]  D B Sanders,et al.  Myasthenia gravis: recommendations for clinical research standards. Task Force of the Medical Scientific Advisory Board of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America. , 2000, Neurology.

[24]  P. Christadoss,et al.  Animal models of myasthenia gravis. , 2000, Clinical immunology.

[25]  John Newsom-Davis,et al.  A randomized double‐blind trial of prednisolone alone or with azathioprine in myasthenia gravis , 1998, Neurology.

[26]  V. Lennon Serologic profile of myasthenia gravis and distinction from the Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome , 1997, Neurology.

[27]  R. Prentice Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.

[28]  L. Elveback,et al.  Clinical Correlations of Antibodies That Bind, Block, or Modulate Human Acetylcholine Receptors in Myasthenia Gravis a , 1987, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[29]  J. Patrick,et al.  Autoimmune Response to Acetylcholine Receptor , 1973, Science.

[30]  L. Phillips,et al.  Epidemiology and Genetics of Myasthenia Gravis , 2009 .

[31]  D. Sanders Chapter 18 Electrophysiologic tests of neuromuscular transmission , 2004 .

[32]  D. Sanders Electrophysiologic tests of neuromuscular transmission. , 2004, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  S. Hanash Disease proteomics : Proteomics , 2003 .

[34]  S. Hanash,et al.  Disease proteomics , 2003, Nature.