Determinants of Perceived Web Site Interactivity

Interactivity is a key feature of Web sites. This article identifies the determinants that enhance user perceptions of interactivity in a communication scenario in which consumers send instant messages to an e-store. Two conceptualizations of interactivity—telepresence theory and interactivity theory—predict that different antecedents (e.g., the number of clicks, response time, message type) are important. The results of Experiment 1 indicate that message type (i.e., how personal a particular message is) is the strongest predictor of interactivity perceptions. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the effects of message type on perceived interactivity and Web site effectiveness are greater when consumers are complaining than when they are inquiring about services. The results of Experiment 2 show that as the level of message personalization increases, interactivity perceptions and site effectiveness are enhanced (linear relationship). The authors discuss the implications of the findings for theory and practice and provide directions for measuring and manipulating interactivity in further research.

[1]  J. Averill.  Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress. , 1973 .

[2]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[3]  J. Grunig,et al.  Toward a Theory of the Public Relations Behavior of Organizations: Review of a Program of Research , 1989 .

[4]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[5]  Everette E. Dennis,et al.  Freedom of Expression, the University, and the Media , 1992 .

[6]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[7]  J. Newhagen,et al.  Nightly@nbc.com: Audience Scope and the Perception of Interactivity in Viewer Mail on the Internet. , 1995 .

[8]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality , 1996 .

[9]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations , 1996 .

[10]  C. Fornell,et al.  The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings , 1996 .

[11]  Louisa Ha,et al.  Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early business web sites , 1998 .

[12]  T Elliott Michael,et al.  CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS OF ADVERTISING CLUTTER AND ITS IMPACT ACROSS VARIOUS MEDIA , 1998 .

[13]  T. Duncan,et al.  A Communication-Based Marketing Model for Managing Relationships , 1998 .

[14]  Christine Moorman,et al.  The Convergence of Planning and Execution: Improvisation in New Product Development , 1998 .

[15]  Wenyu Dou,et al.  Interactive functions and their impacts on the appeal of internet presence sites , 1998 .

[16]  Brian L. Massey,et al.  Interactivity, Online Journalism, and English-Language Web Newspapers in Asia , 1999 .

[17]  E. Thorson,et al.  The Effects of Progressive Levels of Interactivity and Vividness in Web Marketing Sites , 2001 .

[18]  Sharon Dunwoody,et al.  Interactivity, Information Processing, and Learning on the World Wide Web , 2001 .

[19]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[20]  M. Yadav,et al.  Marketing strategy and the internet: An organizing framework , 2002 .

[21]  Jang-Sun Hwang,et al.  Measures of Perceived Interactivity: An Exploration of the Role of Direction of Communication, User Control, and Time in Shaping Perceptions of Interactivity , 2002 .

[22]  Yuping Liu,et al.  What is Interactivity and is it Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person, and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness , 2002 .

[23]  Spiro Kiousis,et al.  Interactivity: a concept explication , 2002, New Media Soc..

[24]  Sally J. McMillan.  A four-part model of cyber-interactivity , 2002, New Media Soc..

[25]  Wendy Macias,et al.  A Beginning Look at the Effects of Interactivity, Product Involvement and Web Experience on Comprehension: Brand Web Sites as Interactive Advertising , 2003 .

[26]  Yuping Liu,et al.  Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of websites , 2003, Journal of Advertising Research.

[27]  Online and offline patronage behavior in a retail setting : three studies , 2003 .

[28]  M. Gilly,et al.  eTailQ: dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting etail quality , 2003 .

[29]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  Waiting for the Web: How Screen Color Affects Time Perception , 2004 .

[30]  Wei-Na Lee,et al.  A Comparison of Objective Characteristics and User Perception of Web Sites , 2004 .

[31]  María Sicilia,et al.  EFFECTS OF INTERACTIVITY IN A WEB SITE: The Moderating Effect of Need for Cognition , 2005 .

[32]  A. Payne,et al.  A Strategic Framework for Customer Relationship Management , 2005 .

[33]  G. Zinkhan,et al.  Young shoppers' experiences with e-shopping , 2005 .

[34]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Best face forward: Improving companies’ service interfaces with customers , 2005 .

[35]  Guohua Wu,et al.  The Mediating Role of Perceived Interactivity in the Effect of Actual Interactivity on Attitude Toward the Website , 2005 .

[36]  Moutusi Maity,et al.  A primer for the use of internet marketing research tools: The value of usability studies , 2005 .

[37]  J. Farley,et al.  The state of interactive marketing in seven countries: Interactive marketing comes of age , 2005 .

[38]  Mark Tremayne,et al.  Lessons Learned from Experiments with Interactivity on the Web , 2005 .

[39]  D. Murphey,et al.  The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century , 2006 .