The effect of framing and negotiation partner's objective on judgments about negotiated transfer prices

A common approach to set transfer prices is via intra-firm negotiation. However, Luft and Libby [Luft, J. L., & Libby, R. (1997). Profit comparisons, market prices and managers' judgments about negotiated transfer prices. The Accounting Review, 72(2), 217-229] found that because of the existence of self-serving biases, negotiating managers have different expectations regarding what constitutes a 'fair' transfer price, leading to a less efficient negotiation process. In this study, we examine two factors that are expected to affect managers' transfer price negotiation judgments, namely, framing as a gain or as a loss and the negotiation partner's objective (whether the partner's objective involves high or low concern-for-others). We propose that these two factors affect managers' perceptions of the negotiation context, and thus the way they interpret the economic and social consequences of accounting information. Our results show that a loss frame (compared to a gain frame) exacerbates managers' self-serving biases and increases the 'transfer price expectation gap' between buyers and sellers. Further, in our experiment where market price is higher than equal-profit price, we find that managers' transfer price expectations are lower (and deviate more from the prevailing market price) when they are negotiating with a partner with high concern-for-others than with a partner with low concern-for-others. We discuss the broader implications of these results for the design of management accounting systems.

[1]  Geoffrey B. Sprinkle.  Perspectives on experimental research in managerial accounting , 2003 .

[2]  H. Tan,et al.  Effects of Authoritative Guidance Availability and Audit Committee Effectiveness on Auditors' Judgments in an Auditor‐Client Negotiation Context , 2003 .

[3]  R. Thaler.  The Winner s Curse , 1991 .

[4]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  K. Trotman,et al.  Effects of auditors' concession timing on financial officers' negotiation judgements. , 2007 .

[6]  Sally Wright,et al.  Auditor Negotiations: An Examination of the Efficacy of Intervention Methods , 2005 .

[7]  R. Scapens,et al.  Co-ordination of internal transactions at Hoogovens Steel; struggling with the tension between performance-oriented business units and the concept of an integrated company , 2001 .

[8]  J. Hurley.  Cost and effect , 2001 .

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[10]  William P. Bottom,et al.  Framing Effects and the Distributive Aspect of Integrative Bargaining , 1993 .

[11]  The Outcome Saliency Effect on Negotiated Transfer Prices , 2004 .

[12]  E. Fehr,et al.  Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[13]  D. G. Pruitt.  Strategic Choice in Negotiation , 1983 .

[14]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Behavioral Law and Economics: Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-serving Biases , 1997 .

[15]  A. Brownstein,et al.  Biased predecision processing. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[17]  R. Fisher,et al.  Beyond Reason: Using Emotions as You Negotiate , 2005 .

[18]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Egocentric Interpretations of Fairness and Interpersonal Conflict , 1992 .

[19]  Steven J. Kachelmeier,et al.  Negotiated Transfer Pricing: Is Fairness Easier Said than Done? , 2002 .

[20]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Negotiator cognition and rationality: A behavioral decision theory perspective , 1992 .

[21]  T. Gärling,et al.  The Effects of Anchor Points and Reference Points on Negotiation Process and Outcome , 1997 .

[22]  Dipankar Ghosh.  Complementary arrangements of organizational factors and outcomes of negotiated transfer price , 2000 .

[23]  Shane S. Dikolli,et al.  Information Technology, Organizational Design, and Transfer Pricing , 2005 .

[24]  Jana L. Raver,et al.  Culture and egocentric perceptions of fairness in conflict and negotiation. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  Karen L. Sedatole,et al.  The Effect of Control Systems on Trust and Cooperation in Collaborative Environments , 2005 .

[26]  Michael Gibbins,et al.  Negotiations over Accounting Issues: The Congruency of Audit Partner and Chief Financial Officer Recalls , 2005 .

[27]  Michael Gibbins,et al.  Evidence About Auditor-Client Management Negotiation Concerning Client's Financial Reporting , 2000 .

[28]  M. Bazerman,et al.  The Effects of Framing and Negotiator Overconfidence on Bargaining Behaviors and Outcomes , 1985 .

[29]  Thomas Kida,et al.  A comparison of auditor and client initial negotiation positions and tactics , 2007 .

[30]  P. Bolton,et al.  Corporate Finance, the Theory of the Firm, and Organizations , 1998 .

[31]  Kimberly K. Moreno,et al.  The Impact of Affective Reactions on Risky Decision Making in Accounting Contexts , 2002 .

[32]  Christopher P. Agoglia,et al.  The Effect of Auditors ’ Use of a Reciprocity-Based Strategy on Auditor-Client Negotiations , 2005 .

[33]  Thomas Kida,et al.  A Comparison of Auditor and Client Negotiation Decisions , 2004 .

[34]  Sarah Maxwell,et al.  The wrath of the fairness-primed negotiator when the reciprocity norm is violated , 2003 .

[35]  Grant T. Savage,et al.  A TEST OF THE MOTIVATIONS UNDERLYING CHOICE OF CONFLICT STRATEGIES IN THE DUAL‐CONCERN MODEL , 1999 .

[36]  Sujatha Perera,et al.  Diffusion of Transfer Pricing Innovation in the Context of Commercialization - a Longitudinal Case Study of a Government Trading Enterprise , 2003 .

[37]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions , 1987 .

[38]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[39]  B. Spicer,et al.  A multi-case investigation of a theory of the transfer pricing process☆ , 1995 .

[40]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Time-driven activity-based costing. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[41]  Schneider,et al.  All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.