Developing a balanced scorecard with System Dynamics

The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is a popular concept for performance measurement, because it focuses attention of management on just a few measures and bridges different functional areas (both financial and non-financial measures are included in the BSC). But, the BSC has also received some criticism. In this paper five limitations of the use of the BSC are discussed: BSCs focus on unidirectional causality, are unable to distinguish delays between actions and their impact on performance, have a dearth of validation capabilities, integrate insufficiently strategy with operational measures and suffer from internal biases. We propose a system dynamics approach to develop a BSC in order to overcome these limitations. We present a case study from the insurance sector where this approach is applied. The results suggest that developing a BSC with system dynamics is a promising approach to supplement existing BSC frameworks.

[1]  Shirley Fisher,et al.  Stress And Strategy , 1986 .

[2]  R. Yerkes,et al.  The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit‐formation , 1908 .

[3]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[4]  W. Mason.  Creating the Corporate Future , 1982 .

[5]  Barry Richmond,et al.  Systems thinking/system dynamics: Let's just get on with it , 1994 .

[6]  Andy Neely,et al.  Performance measurement system design , 1995 .

[7]  Jay W. Forrester,et al.  Policies, decisions and information sources for modeling☆ , 1992 .

[8]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  The balanced scorecard: a foundation for the strategic management of information systems , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  Elaine Palmer,et al.  Management by objectives and the Balanced Scorecard: will Rome fall again? , 1998 .

[10]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[11]  Andy Neely,et al.  Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems , 2000 .

[12]  L. Allbon,et al.  Creative Problem Solving , 1968, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[13]  David P. Norton,et al.  Leading Change with the Balanced Scorecard , 2001 .

[14]  Hanne Nørreklit.  The Balance on the Balanced Scorecard: A Critical Analysis of Some of Its Assumptions , 2000 .

[15]  Henk Akkermans,et al.  Renga: A systems approach to facilitating inter-organizational network development , 2001 .

[16]  David C. Lane,et al.  Modelling as learning: A consultancy methodology for enhancing learning in management teams , 1992 .

[17]  E. Johnsen.  Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[18]  G. Kreweras.  Creating the corporate future: Russell L. ACKOFF Wiley, New York, 1981, xi + 297 pages, £10.85 , 1982 .

[19]  J. Sterman.  Business Dynamics , 2000 .

[20]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[21]  Kim Warren,et al.  The effective communication of system dynamics to improve insight and learning in management education , 1999, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[22]  Natasa Rupcic,et al.  The fifth discipline-the art and practice of the learning organisation , 2002 .

[23]  Didier P. Hostettler,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: a Necessary Good or an Unnecessary Evil , 1999 .

[24]  P. Senge.  The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[25]  L. Siegele,et al.  How about now? a survey of the real-time economy , 2002, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[26]  Ann Taket,et al.  Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. , 1991 .

[27]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[28]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Creating the Corporate Future: Plan or be Planned For , 1981 .

[29]  Mik Wisniewski,et al.  Measuring performance in Dumfries and Galloway Constabulary with the Balanced Scorecard , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[30]  Pantaleo Mutajwaa Daniel Rwelamila,et al.  Total systems intervention: an integrated approach to time, cost and quality management , 1995 .

[31]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[32]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[33]  M. Broadbent.  Measuring business performance , 1999 .

[34]  Henk Akkermans,et al.  Clients' opinions on group model-building : an exploratory study , 1997 .

[35]  T. Hill.  Manufacturing Strategy: The Strategic Management of the Manufacturing Function , 1985 .

[36]  P. Senge.  THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[37]  Henk Akkermans,et al.  On the usability of quantitative modelling in operations strategy decision making , 1997 .

[38]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[39]  Michael Pidd,et al.  Tools for Thinking—Modelling in Management Science , 1997 .

[40]  K. Hafeez,et al.  Determining key capabilities of a firm using analytic hierarchy process , 2002 .

[41]  Simon Peck,et al.  Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics , 1996, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[42]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Teamwork in group model building , 1995 .

[43]  Mjf Marc Wouters,et al.  Performance management as a sporty exercise , 2001 .

[44]  P. Hepworth,et al.  Weighing it up ‐ a literature review for the balanced scorecard , 1998 .

[45]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[46]  J. Forrester.  Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[47]  Kim Hua Tan,et al.  Designing linked performance measures - a connectance based approach , 2002 .

[48]  Geoff Coyle,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative modelling in system dynamics: some research questions , 2000 .

[49]  Michael Pidd,et al.  Tools for thinking , 1996 .

[50]  Rogelio Oliva,et al.  Maps and models in system dynamics: a response to Coyle , 2001, System Dynamics Review.

[51]  Roger I. Hall,et al.  A Corporate System Model of a Sports Club: Using Simulation as an Aid to Policy Making in a Crisis , 1983 .

[52]  Graham Winch.  Consensus building in the planning process: Benefits from a “hard” modeling approach , 1993 .

[53]  John D. W. Morecroft,et al.  Rationality in the Analysis of Behavioral Simulation Models , 1985 .

[54]  de M Marco Haas,et al.  Strategic dialogue : in search of goal coherence , 2000 .

[55]  C. West Churchman,et al.  The Systems Approach , 1979 .

[56]  E F Wolstenholme,et al.  Qualitative vs quantitative modelling: the evolving balance , 1999, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[57]  R. G. Coyle,et al.  The Development of System Dynamics as a Methodology for System Description and Qualitative Analysis , 1983 .

[58]  Teemu Malmi,et al.  BALANCED SCORECARDS IN FINNISH COMPANIES: A RESEARCH NOTE , 2001 .

[59]  Andi Smart,et al.  Theory and practice in SME performance measurement systems , 2001 .

[60]  Mark Paich,et al.  Boom, bust, and failures to learn in experimental markets , 1993 .