Accuracy of the vivofit activity tracker

Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of the vivofit activity tracker in assessing energy expenditure and step count. Thirteen participants wore the vivofit activity tracker for five days. Participants were required to independently perform 1 h of self-selected activity each day of the study. On day four, participants came to the lab to undergo BMR and a treadmill-walking task (TWT). On day five, participants completed 1 h of office-type activities. BMR values estimated by the vivofit were not significantly different from the values measured through indirect calorimetry (IC). The vivofit significantly underestimated EE for treadmill walking, but responded to the differences in the inclination. Vivofit underestimated step count for level walking but provided an accurate estimate for incline walking. There was a strong correlation between EE and the exercise intensity. The vivofit activity tracker is on par with similar devices and can be used to track physical activity.

[1]  Arlen C. Moller,et al.  Multiple behavior changes in diet and activity: a randomized controlled trial using mobile technology. , 2012, Archives of internal medicine.

[2]  Wearable Computing and the Hype of Tracking Personal Activity , 2014 .

[3]  Carol Ewing Garber,et al.  ACSM Position Stand: The Recommended Quantity and Quality of Exercise for Developing and Maintaining Cardiorespiratory and Muscular Fitness, and Flexibility in Healthy Adults , 1998 .

[4]  J F Nichols,et al.  Validity, reliability, and calibration of the Tritrac accelerometer as a measure of physical activity. , 1999, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  Hirofumi Tanaka,et al.  Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Edward L. Melanson,et al.  Accuracy Of Fitbit Activity Monitor To Predict Energy Expenditure With And Without Classification Of Activities: 725 , 2011 .

[7]  J. B. Weir.  New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism , 1949, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  Shaw Bronner,et al.  Comparison of steps and energy expenditure assessment in adults of Fitbit Tracker and Ultra to the Actical and indirect calorimetry , 2013, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[9]  Amalia Waxman,et al.  Who Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health * , 2004, Food and nutrition bulletin.

[10]  Scott E Crouter,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of 10 pedometers for measuring steps over a 400-m walk. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  Molly Zellweger Mackinlay.  Phases of Accuracy Diagnosis: (In)visibility of System Status in the Fitbit , 2013 .

[12]  M. Sun,et al.  Improving energy expenditure estimation by using a triaxial accelerometer. , 1997, Journal of applied physiology.

[13]  Dinesh John,et al.  Validation of the Fitbit wireless activity tracker for prediction of energy expenditure. , 2015, Journal of physical activity & health.

[14]  Charlie Potter,et al.  Comparison of activity monitors to estimate energy cost of treadmill exercise. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  Margaret L Fruin,et al.  Validity of a multi-sensor armband in estimating rest and exercise energy expenditure. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  J A Balogun,et al.  Calorimetric validation of the Caltrac accelerometer during level walking. , 1989, Physical therapy.

[17]  John P. Porcari,et al.  The accuracy of various activity trackers in estimating steps taken and energy expenditure , 2013 .

[18]  Mary Duggan,et al.  New Canadian physical activity guidelines. , 2011, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[19]  I. Olkin,et al.  Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. , 2007, JAMA.

[20]  D. Bassett,et al.  Estimating energy expenditure using accelerometers , 2006, European Journal of Applied Physiology.