An Integrated Framework of Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Binocular Rivalry

Fluctuations in perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry exhibit several hallmark characteristics. First, dominance switches are not periodic but, instead, stochastic: perception changes unpredictably. Second, despite being stochastic, average durations of rivalry dominance vary dependent on the strength of the rival stimuli: variations in contrast, luminance, or spatial frequency produce predictable changes in average dominance durations and, hence, in alternation rate. Third, perceptual switches originate locally and spread globally over time, sometimes as traveling waves of dominance: rivalry transitions are spatiotemporal events. This essay (1) reviews recent advances in our understanding of the bases of these three hallmark characteristics of binocular rivalry dynamics and (2) provides an integrated framework to account for those dynamics using cooperative and competitive spatial interactions among local neural circuits distributed over the visual field's retinotopic map. We close with speculations about how that framework might incorporate top-down influences on rivalry dynamics.

[1]  L. Lack.  Selective attention and the control of binocular rivalry , 1978 .

[2]  R. Blake,et al.  Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[3]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  A Common Oscillator for Perceptual Rivalries? , 2003, Perception.

[4]  R. Blake,et al.  Spatial Spread of Interocular Suppression is Guided by Stimulus Configuration , 2009, Perception.

[5]  M. Kleiner,et al.  Audiovisual interactions in binocular rivalry. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[6]  J. Gallant,et al.  Time Course of Attention Reveals Different Mechanisms for Spatial and Feature-Based Attention in Area V4 , 2005, Neuron.

[7]  H. Ehrlichman,et al.  Looking for answers: Eye movements in non-visual cognitive tasks , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[8]  N J Wade,et al.  Aftereffects in Binocular Rivalry , 1986, Perception.

[9]  C. D. Weert,et al.  A test of Levelt's second proposition for binocular rivalry , 1993, Vision Research.

[10]  D. Heeger,et al.  Modulation of Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Binocular Rivalry by Collinear Facilitation and Pattern-dependent Adaptation , 2022 .

[11]  R. Blake,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Voluntary Action Influences Visual Competition , 2022 .

[12]  Jude F. Mitchell,et al.  Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry , 2004, Nature.

[13]  M. Fahle.  Binocular rivalry: Suppression depends on orientation and spatial frequency , 1982, Vision Research.

[14]  Paul C. Bressloff,et al.  Neural field model of binocular rivalry waves , 2012, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[15]  Hugh R Wilson,et al.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Mathias Bode,et al.  Lateral Neural Model of Binocular Rivalry , 2003, Neural Computation.

[17]  Peter Dayan,et al.  A Hierarchical Model of Binocular Rivalry , 1998, Neural Computation.

[18]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  A Spiking Neuron Model for Binocular Rivalry , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[19]  Richard H. A. H. Jacobs,et al.  The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[20]  Randolph Blake,et al.  A fresh look at interocular grouping during binocular rivalry , 2004, Vision Research.

[21]  S. R. Lehky.  Binocular rivalry is not chaotic , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  W. Levelt.  On binocular rivalry , 1965 .

[23]  Jeroen J. A. van Boxtel,et al.  Retinotopic and non-retinotopic stimulus encoding in binocular rivalry and the involvement of feedback. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[24]  Min-Suk Kang.  Size matters: a study of binocular rivalry dynamics. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[25]  R. van Ee.  Percept-switch nucleation in binocular rivalry reveals local adaptation characteristics of early visual processing. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[26]  R. van Ee,et al.  Retinal image shifts, but not eye movements per se, cause alternations in awareness during binocular rivalry. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[27]  R. Fox,et al.  Binocular rivalry and reciprocal inhibition , 1969 .

[28]  Chris L. E. Paffen,et al.  Shifting spatial attention makes you flip: Exogenous visual attention triggers perceptual alternations during binocular rivalry , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[29]  M. Lankheet,et al.  Unraveling adaptation and mutual inhibition in perceptual rivalry. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[30]  David A. Leopold,et al.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? , 1996, Nature.

[31]  Chris L. E. Paffen,et al.  The Spatial Origin of a Perceptual Transition in Binocular Rivalry , 2008, PloS one.

[32]  Robert Fox,et al.  Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations , 1967 .

[33]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  Role of mutual inhibition in binocular rivalry. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  M. Hollins,et al.  Adaptation of the binocular rivalry mechanism. , 1980, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[35]  R. Blake,et al.  Temporal perturbations of binocular rivalry , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  G. Alpers,et al.  Emotional pictures predominate in binocular rivalry , 2006 .

[37]  R Blake,et al.  The Site of Binocular Rivalry Suppression , 1979, Perception.

[38]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic representations and generative models of brain function , 2001, Brain Research Bulletin.

[40]  D. Alais,et al.  Contour interactions between pairs of Gabors engaged in binocular rivalry reveal a map of the association field , 2006, Vision Research.

[41]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[42]  P. Christiaan Klink,et al.  General Validity of Levelt's Propositions Reveals Common Computational Mechanisms for Visual Rivalry , 2008, PloS one.

[43]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Psychophysical magic: rendering the visible ‘invisible’ , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  P. Mamassian,et al.  Task Usefulness Affects Perception of Rivalrous Images , 2010, Psychological science.

[45]  L. Dam,et al.  Retinal image shifts, but not eye movements per se, cause alternations in awareness during binocular rivalry , 2006 .

[46]  David Alais,et al.  Multisensory Congruency as a Mechanism for Attentional Control over Perceptual Selection , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  R. Blake,et al.  Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[48]  Yee-Joon Kim,et al.  Stochastic resonance in binocular rivalry , 2006, Vision Research.

[49]  Sheng He,et al.  Genes contribute to the switching dynamics of bistable perception. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[50]  David F. Nichols,et al.  Stimulus specificity in spatially-extended interocular suppression , 2009, Vision Research.

[51]  Denise Chen,et al.  Olfaction Modulates Visual Perception in Binocular Rivalry , 2010, Current Biology.

[52]  Kevan A C Martin,et al.  Neuroanatomy: Uninhibited Connectivity in Neocortex? , 2011, Current Biology.

[53]  P. Walker.  Binocular rivalry : Central or peripheral selective processes? , 1978 .

[54]  J. Rinzel,et al.  Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  S. R. Lehky.  An Astable Multivibrator Model of Binocular Rivalry , 1988, Perception.

[56]  K. Matsuoka.  The dynamic model of binocular rivalry , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[57]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Periodic perturbations producing phase-locked fluctuations in visual perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[58]  Lisa Feldman Barrett,et al.  What You Feel Influences What You See: The Role of Affective Feelings in Resolving Binocular Rivalry. , 2011, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[59]  F. Tong,et al.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[60]  Randolph Blake,et al.  What causes alternations in dominance during binocular rivalry? , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[61]  R. Blake,et al.  A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[62]  P. Whittle,et al.  Some experiments on figural effects in binocular rivalry , 1968 .

[63]  Jianbo Gao,et al.  Inertia and memory in ambiguous visual perception , 2006, Cognitive Processing.

[64]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry , 2006, Vision Research.

[65]  M. Morrone,et al.  Touch disambiguates rivalrous perception at early stages of visual analysis , 2010, Current Biology.

[66]  P. Walker.  Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations , 1975 .

[67]  Charles Wheatstone.  On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. , 1962 .

[68]  R. van Ee,et al.  Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[69]  J. Pettigrew.  Searching for the Switch: Neural Bases for Perceptual Rivalry Alternations , 2001 .

[70]  Nava Rubin,et al.  Balance between noise and adaptation in competition models of perceptual bistability , 2009, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[71]  Jonathan A. Marshall,et al.  Neural model of temporal and stochastic properties of binocular rivalry , 2000, Neurocomputing.

[72]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Neural correlates of consciousness in humans , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[73]  C. Wheatstone.  XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[74]  R. Blake.  © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 5 A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies , 2000 .

[75]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness: The Role of Attention , 1999, Perception.

[76]  R Fox,et al.  Stochastic properties of stabilized-image binocular rivalry alternations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[77]  Sukeichi Kakizaki.  BINOCULAR RIVALRY AND STIMULUS INTENSITY , 1960 .

[78]  U. Neisser,et al.  Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[79]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[80]  Nicholas G Martin,et al.  Genetic contribution to individual variation in binocular rivalry rate , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[81]  H. Wilson,et al.  Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception , 2001, Nature.

[82]  I. Kovács,et al.  When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[83]  M. Meenes.  A Phenomenological Description of Retinal Rivalry , 1930 .

[84]  R. Blake.  Threshold conditions for binocular rivalry. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.